Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make assumption functions in new solver take Binder<'tcx, Clause<'tcx>> #112665

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 17, 2023

Conversation

compiler-errors
Copy link
Member

We just use an if-let to match on an optional clause at all the places where we transition from Predicate -> Clause, but I assume that when things like item-bounds and param-env start to only store Clauses then those can just be trivially dropped.

r? @lcnr

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. WG-trait-system-refactor The Rustc Trait System Refactor Initiative labels Jun 15, 2023
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Jun 15, 2023

Some changes occurred to the core trait solver

cc @rust-lang/initiative-trait-system-refactor

@lcnr
Copy link
Contributor

lcnr commented Jun 15, 2023

@bors r+ rollup=always

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jun 15, 2023

📌 Commit b4ba7c4 has been approved by lcnr

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jun 15, 2023
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Jun 16, 2023
…lause, r=lcnr

Make assumption functions in new solver take `Binder<'tcx, Clause<'tcx>>`

We just use an if-let to match on an optional clause at all the places where we transition from `Predicate` -> `Clause`, but I assume that when things like item-bounds and param-env start to only store `Clause`s then those can just be trivially dropped.

r? `@lcnr`
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jun 16, 2023
…mpiler-errors

Rollup of 7 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#111074 (Relax implicit `T: Sized` bounds on `BufReader<T>`, `BufWriter<T>` and `LineWriter<T>`)
 - rust-lang#112226 (std: available_parallelism using native netbsd api first)
 - rust-lang#112474 (Support 128-bit enum variant in debuginfo codegen)
 - rust-lang#112662 (`#[lang_item]` for `core::ptr::Unique`)
 - rust-lang#112665 (Make assumption functions in new solver take `Binder<'tcx, Clause<'tcx>>`)
 - rust-lang#112684 (Disable alignment checks on i686-pc-windows-msvc)
 - rust-lang#112706 (Add `SyntaxContext::is_root`)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit cef94ec into rust-lang:master Jun 17, 2023
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.72.0 milestone Jun 17, 2023
@compiler-errors compiler-errors deleted the assumption-takes-clause branch August 11, 2023 19:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. WG-trait-system-refactor The Rustc Trait System Refactor Initiative
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants