Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rollup of 3 pull requests #100649

Closed
wants to merge 12 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

TaKO8Ki
Copy link
Member

@TaKO8Ki TaKO8Ki commented Aug 16, 2022

Successful merges:

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

RalfJung and others added 12 commits August 2, 2022 17:09
Co-authored-by: Léo Lanteri Thauvin <leseulartichaut@gmail.com>
By using `expr_str` more and adding `expr_{char,byte_str}`.
- Rename `ast::Lit::token` as `ast::Lit::token_lit`, because its type is
  `token::Lit`, which is not a token. (This has been confusing me for a
  long time.)
  reasonable because we have an `ast::token::Lit` inside an `ast::Lit`.
- Rename `LitKind::{from,to}_lit_token` as
  `LitKind::{from,to}_token_lit`, to match the above change and
  `token::Lit`.
…trochenkov

Clean up `LitKind`

r? `@petrochenkov`
…n, r=jackh726

never consider unsafe blocks unused if they would be required with deny(unsafe_op_in_unsafe_fn)

Judging from rust-lang#71668 (comment) the consensus nowadays seems to be that we should never consider an unsafe block unused if it was required with `deny(unsafe_op_in_unsafe_fn)`, no matter whether that lint is actually enabled or not. So let's adjust rustc accordingly.

The first commit does the change, the 2nd does some cleanup.
…rochenkov

optimization of access level table construction

Refactoring which was mentioned in rust-lang#87487
@rustbot rustbot added T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. rollup A PR which is a rollup labels Aug 16, 2022
@TaKO8Ki
Copy link
Member Author

TaKO8Ki commented Aug 16, 2022

@bors r+ rollup=never p=3

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Aug 16, 2022

📌 Commit 7f57787 has been approved by TaKO8Ki

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added the S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. label Aug 16, 2022
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Aug 16, 2022

⌛ Testing commit 7f57787 with merge e3289d537cb9f085744a5e4faed5fac7879f31b7...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Aug 17, 2022

💥 Test timed out

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Aug 17, 2022
@TaKO8Ki
Copy link
Member Author

TaKO8Ki commented Aug 17, 2022

@bors retry

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Aug 17, 2022
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Aug 17, 2022

⌛ Testing commit 7f57787 with merge af0b8709da2adda5e58bd316ef1b3194b6330c16...

@rust-log-analyzer
Copy link
Collaborator

A job failed! Check out the build log: (web) (plain)

Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Aug 17, 2022

💥 Test timed out

@bors bors removed the S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. label Aug 17, 2022
@bors bors added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Aug 17, 2022
@rust-log-analyzer
Copy link
Collaborator

A job failed! Check out the build log: (web) (plain)

Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)

@TaKO8Ki
Copy link
Member Author

TaKO8Ki commented Aug 17, 2022

@bors r-

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Aug 17, 2022
@TaKO8Ki TaKO8Ki closed this Aug 17, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
rollup A PR which is a rollup S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants