Rollup of 4 pull requests #100634
Closed
Rollup of 4 pull requests #100634
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…safe_op_in_unsafe_fn
Co-authored-by: Léo Lanteri Thauvin <leseulartichaut@gmail.com>
The two methods are almost identical.
By using `expr_str` more and adding `expr_{char,byte_str}`.
- Rename `ast::Lit::token` as `ast::Lit::token_lit`, because its type is
`token::Lit`, which is not a token. (This has been confusing me for a
long time.)
reasonable because we have an `ast::token::Lit` inside an `ast::Lit`.
- Rename `LitKind::{from,to}_lit_token` as
`LitKind::{from,to}_token_lit`, to match the above change and
`token::Lit`.
…trochenkov Clean up `LitKind` r? `@petrochenkov`
…n, r=jackh726 never consider unsafe blocks unused if they would be required with deny(unsafe_op_in_unsafe_fn) Judging from rust-lang#71668 (comment) the consensus nowadays seems to be that we should never consider an unsafe block unused if it was required with `deny(unsafe_op_in_unsafe_fn)`, no matter whether that lint is actually enabled or not. So let's adjust rustc accordingly. The first commit does the change, the 2nd does some cleanup.
change rlib format to distinguish native dependencies Another one method to solve problem mentioned in rust-lang#99429. Changed .rlib format, it contains all bundled native libraries as archieves. At link time rlib is unpacked and native dependencies linked separately. New behavior hidden under separate_native_rlib_dependencies flag.
…rochenkov optimization of access level table construction Refactoring which was mentioned in rust-lang#87487
rustbot
added
T-compiler
|
@bors r+ rollup=never p=4 |
bors
added
the
S-waiting-on-bors
|
⌛ Testing commit 7dfbaa2 with merge 40a8413ca36bb1644c895d3c3543cf59f6e27f8e... |
|
The job Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot) |
|
💔 Test failed - checks-actions |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-review
|
@bors r- |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-author
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
LitKind#100018 (Clean upLitKind)Failed merges:
r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup
Create a similar rollup