Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Where's the tracking issue for const_fn_trait_bound stabilization? #93679

Closed
Logarithmus opened this issue Feb 5, 2022 · 1 comment · Fixed by #93682
Closed

Where's the tracking issue for const_fn_trait_bound stabilization? #93679

Logarithmus opened this issue Feb 5, 2022 · 1 comment · Fixed by #93682
Labels
A-meta Area: Issues about the rust-lang/rust repository. F-const_trait_impl `#![feature(const_trait_impl)]`

Comments

@Logarithmus
Copy link
Contributor

Logarithmus commented Feb 5, 2022 •
edited
Loading

The compilation error leads to "#57563", but I don't see any references for it there.
Just wanted to implement const fn new() for a generic struct with trait bounds...
@rustbot rustbot added A-meta Area: Issues about the rust-lang/rust repository. F-const_trait_impl `#![feature(const_trait_impl)]` labels Feb 5, 2022
@PatchMixolydic PatchMixolydic mentioned this issue Feb 5, 2022
Merged
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this issue Feb 6, 2022
@matthiaskrgr
Rollup merge of rust-lang#93682 - PatchMixolydic:where-in-the-world-i…
533bd38 
…s-const_fn_trait_bound, r=oli-obk

Update tracking issue for `const_fn_trait_bound`

It previously pointed to rust-lang#57563, the conglomerate issue for `const fn` (presumably under the feature gate `const_fn`). This tracking issue doesn't mention anything about `const_fn_trait_bound`(the only occurrence of "trait bound" is for the now-removed `?const Trait` syntax), which can be confusing to people who want to find out more about trait bounds on `const fn`s. This pull request changes the tracking issue to one meant specifically for `const_fn_trait_bound`, rust-lang#93706, which can help collect information on this feature's stabilization and point users towards `const_trait_impl` if they're looking for const-in-const-contexts trait bounds.

Fixes rust-lang#93679.

`@rustbot` modify labels +A-const-fn +F-const_trait_impl
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this issue Feb 7, 2022
@matthiaskrgr
Rollup merge of rust-lang#93682 - PatchMixolydic:where-in-the-world-i…
8e3d04f 
…s-const_fn_trait_bound, r=oli-obk

Update tracking issue for `const_fn_trait_bound`

It previously pointed to rust-lang#57563, the conglomerate issue for `const fn` (presumably under the feature gate `const_fn`). This tracking issue doesn't mention anything about `const_fn_trait_bound`(the only occurrence of "trait bound" is for the now-removed `?const Trait` syntax), which can be confusing to people who want to find out more about trait bounds on `const fn`s. This pull request changes the tracking issue to one meant specifically for `const_fn_trait_bound`, rust-lang#93706, which can help collect information on this feature's stabilization and point users towards `const_trait_impl` if they're looking for const-in-const-contexts trait bounds.

Fixes rust-lang#93679.

``@rustbot`` modify labels +A-const-fn +F-const_trait_impl
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this issue Feb 7, 2022
@matthiaskrgr
Rollup merge of rust-lang#93682 - PatchMixolydic:where-in-the-world-i…
ee1740b 
…s-const_fn_trait_bound, r=oli-obk

Update tracking issue for `const_fn_trait_bound`

It previously pointed to rust-lang#57563, the conglomerate issue for `const fn` (presumably under the feature gate `const_fn`). This tracking issue doesn't mention anything about `const_fn_trait_bound`(the only occurrence of "trait bound" is for the now-removed `?const Trait` syntax), which can be confusing to people who want to find out more about trait bounds on `const fn`s. This pull request changes the tracking issue to one meant specifically for `const_fn_trait_bound`, rust-lang#93706, which can help collect information on this feature's stabilization and point users towards `const_trait_impl` if they're looking for const-in-const-contexts trait bounds.

Fixes rust-lang#93679.

```@rustbot``` modify labels +A-const-fn +F-const_trait_impl
m-ou-se added a commit to m-ou-se/rust that referenced this issue Feb 7, 2022
@m-ou-se
Rollup merge of rust-lang#93682 - PatchMixolydic:where-in-the-world-i…
32df274 
…s-const_fn_trait_bound, r=oli-obk

Update tracking issue for `const_fn_trait_bound`

It previously pointed to rust-lang#57563, the conglomerate issue for `const fn` (presumably under the feature gate `const_fn`). This tracking issue doesn't mention anything about `const_fn_trait_bound`(the only occurrence of "trait bound" is for the now-removed `?const Trait` syntax), which can be confusing to people who want to find out more about trait bounds on `const fn`s. This pull request changes the tracking issue to one meant specifically for `const_fn_trait_bound`, rust-lang#93706, which can help collect information on this feature's stabilization and point users towards `const_trait_impl` if they're looking for const-in-const-contexts trait bounds.

Fixes rust-lang#93679.

````@rustbot```` modify labels +A-const-fn +F-const_trait_impl
@bors bors closed this as completed in f4377a8 Feb 7, 2022
@PatchMixolydic
Copy link
Contributor

For the sake of posterity, the tracking issue for this feature gate is now #93706.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
A-meta Area: Issues about the rust-lang/rust repository. F-const_trait_impl `#![feature(const_trait_impl)]`
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

Update tracking issue for const_fn_trait_bound PatchMixolydic/rust
3 participants
@PatchMixolydic @Logarithmus @rustbot