Tracking Issue for wrapping_int_assign_impl

[kellerkindt]

Feature gate: #![feature(wrapping_int_assign_impl)]

This is a tracking issue for adding basic integer operations to the Wrapping type:

let mut value = Wrapping(2u8);
value += 3u8;
value -= 1u8;
value *= 2u8;
value /= 2u8;
value %= 2u8;
value ^= 255u8;
value |= 123u8;
value &= 2u8;

As well as

let mut value = Wrapping(2u8);
let _: Wrapping<u8> = value + 3u8;
let _: Wrapping<u8> = value - 1u8;
let _: Wrapping<u8> = value * 2u8;
let _: Wrapping<u8> = value / 2u8;
let _: Wrapping<u8> = value % 2u8;
let _: Wrapping<u8> = value ^ 255u8;
let _: Wrapping<u8> = value | 123u8;
let _: Wrapping<u8> = value & 2u8;

Steps / History

• Proposal for this implementation: Tracking issue for core::ops::*<T> on Saturating<T> / Wrapping<T> type #91586
• Implementation of wrapping_int_assign_impl Impl {Add,Sub,Mul,Div,Rem,BitXor,BitOr,BitAnd}Assign<$t> for Wrapping<$t> for rust 1.60.0 #93208
• Final comment period (FCP)
• Stabilization PR

Unresolved Questions

• Is this reasonable?

This is analog to the implementation for the Saturating type here #92354

[m-ou-se]

Trait implementations like these for a stable type cannot be added as unstable, so there's nothing to be tracked. So, I'm closing this issue.

In general, please only create tracking issues after a reviewer from the libs-api team has approved of the new (unstable) feature and asked you to do so. (See also the tracking issue template.) You can use issue = "none" as a placeholder when opening a PR for a new unstable feature that doesn't have an RFC.