Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Introduce as_slice/as_mut_slice methods on std::vec::IntoIter struct. #35601

Closed
frewsxcv opened this issue Aug 11, 2016 · 6 comments
Closed

Introduce as_slice/as_mut_slice methods on std::vec::IntoIter struct. #35601

frewsxcv opened this issue Aug 11, 2016 · 6 comments
Labels
B-unstable Blocker: Implemented in the nightly compiler and unstable. final-comment-period In the final comment period and will be merged soon unless new substantive objections are raised. T-libs-api Relevant to the library API team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

Comments

@frewsxcv
Copy link
Member

frewsxcv commented Aug 11, 2016

Tracking issue for: #35447

@alexcrichton alexcrichton added T-libs-api Relevant to the library API team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. B-unstable Blocker: Implemented in the nightly compiler and unstable. labels Aug 11, 2016
@SimonSapin
Copy link
Contributor

I’ve wanted to use this today, but I’ll probably have to change my code to work differently.

FCP to stabilize?

@SimonSapin
Copy link
Contributor

For context: this code is using vec::IntoIter<syn::TokenTree> as parser input.

For more context: I’m attempting to replace a compiler plugin (for a procedural expression-macro) by a build script that parses the source file for a Rust module with the syn crate, walks the AST to find invocations of this macro, and replace them with the expansion. Vec<TokenTree> is used to represent the "arguments" of a macro invocation.

@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

@rfcbot fcp merge

Neat methods!

@rfcbot
Copy link

rfcbot commented Nov 1, 2016

Team member @alexcrichton has proposed to merge this. The next step is review by the rest of the tagged teams:

No concerns currently listed.

Once these reviewers reach consensus, this will enter its final comment period. If you spot a major issue that hasn't been raised at any point in this process, please speak up!

See this document for info about what commands tagged team members can give me.

@rfcbot
Copy link

rfcbot commented Nov 12, 2016

🔔 This is now entering its final comment period, as per the review above. 🔔

psst @alexcrichton, I wasn't able to add the final-comment-period label, please do so.

@alexcrichton alexcrichton added the final-comment-period In the final comment period and will be merged soon unless new substantive objections are raised. label Nov 12, 2016
@rfcbot
Copy link

rfcbot commented Nov 22, 2016

The final comment period is now complete.

bors added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 18, 2016
Library stabilizations/deprecations for 1.15 release

Stabilized:

- `std::iter::Iterator::{min_by, max_by}`
- `std::os::*::fs::FileExt`
- `std::sync::atomic::Atomic*::{get_mut, into_inner}`
- `std::vec::IntoIter::{as_slice, as_mut_slice}`
- `std::sync::mpsc::Receiver::try_iter`
- `std::os::unix::process::CommandExt::before_exec`
- `std::rc::Rc::{strong_count, weak_count}`
- `std::sync::Arc::{strong_count, weak_count}`
- `std::char::{encode_utf8, encode_utf16}`
- `std::cell::Ref::clone`
- `std::io::Take::into_inner`

Deprecated:

- `std::rc::Rc::{would_unwrap, is_unique}`
- `std::cell::RefCell::borrow_state`

Closes #23755
Closes #27733
Closes #27746
Closes #27784
Closes #28356
Closes #31398
Closes #34931
Closes #35601
Closes #35603
Closes #35918
Closes #36105
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
B-unstable Blocker: Implemented in the nightly compiler and unstable. final-comment-period In the final comment period and will be merged soon unless new substantive objections are raised. T-libs-api Relevant to the library API team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants