Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Disallow bit-shifting in integer_arithmetic #5430

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 15, 2020

Conversation

michaelsproul
Copy link
Contributor

@michaelsproul michaelsproul commented Apr 7, 2020

Make the integer_arithmetic lint detect all the operations that are defined as being capable of overflow in the Rust Reference, by also linting for bit-shifting operations (<<, >>).

changelog: Disallow bit-shifting in integer_arithmetic

@michaelsproul michaelsproul changed the title Improve integer_arithmetic: lint if and only if operation can overflow integer_arithmetic: lint iff operation can overflow Apr 7, 2020
@michaelsproul

This comment has been minimized.

@michaelsproul michaelsproul changed the title integer_arithmetic: lint iff operation can overflow [WIP] integer_arithmetic: lint iff operation can overflow Apr 8, 2020
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Apr 8, 2020

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #5438) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@flip1995 flip1995 added the S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action from the author. (Use `@rustbot ready` to update this status) label Apr 8, 2020
@michaelsproul michaelsproul changed the title [WIP] integer_arithmetic: lint iff operation can overflow Disallow bit-shifting in integer_arithmetic Apr 13, 2020
With this change, the lint checks all operations that are defined as
being capable of overflow in the Rust Reference.
@michaelsproul
Copy link
Contributor Author

Updated and rebased

@flip1995 flip1995 added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action from the author. (Use `@rustbot ready` to update this status) labels Apr 15, 2020
@flip1995 flip1995 added S-waiting-on-bors Status: The marked PR was approved and is only waiting bors and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties labels Apr 15, 2020
@flip1995
Copy link
Member

Thanks! Waiting for rustup.

@flip1995
Copy link
Member

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Apr 15, 2020

📌 Commit 23df4a0 has been approved by flip1995

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Apr 15, 2020

🌲 The tree is currently closed for pull requests below priority 1, this pull request will be tested once the tree is reopened

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 15, 2020
Rollup of 5 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #5226 (Add lint for explicit deref and deref_mut method calls)
 - #5248 (Add lint on large non scalar const)
 - #5430 (Disallow bit-shifting in integer_arithmetic)
 - #5466 (large_enum_variant: Report sizes of variants)
 - #5468 (Zero single char names)

Failed merges:

r? @ghost

changelog: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 2538e63 into rust-lang:master Apr 15, 2020
@michaelsproul michaelsproul deleted the integer-arithmetic branch April 24, 2020 05:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: The marked PR was approved and is only waiting bors
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants