Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Upgrade to gix v0.45 for multi-round pack negotiations. #12236

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 6, 2023

Conversation

Byron
Copy link
Member

@Byron Byron commented Jun 6, 2023

Previously, fetches and clones would routinely fail with a panic
that indicated that pack-negotiation can't take longer than 1 round
with our previous Naive approach.

With this version of gitoxide there is now faithful support for both
the consecutive and the skipping algorithm and multiple rounds of
negotiations, which should make all clones and fetches possible.


It would be great if we could validate that https://rsproxy.cn is now working -
unfortunately I couldn't find the issue to let folks know there.

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Jun 6, 2023

r? @weihanglo

(rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Jun 6, 2023
@Byron
Copy link
Member Author

Byron commented Jun 6, 2023

It looks like some tests are failing due to different error messages, I will take care of that shortly.

Previously, fetches and clones would routinely fail with a panic
that indicated that pack-negotiation can't take longer than 1 round
with our previous `Naive` approach.

With this version of `gitoxide` there is now faithful support for both
the `consecutive` and the `skipping` algorithm and multiple rounds of
negotiations, which should make all clones and fetches possible.
@epage
Copy link
Contributor

epage commented Jun 6, 2023

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jun 6, 2023

📌 Commit b0e99ed has been approved by epage

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jun 6, 2023
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jun 6, 2023

⌛ Testing commit b0e99ed with merge e07efd8...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jun 6, 2023

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: epage
Pushing e07efd8 to master...

@bors bors merged commit e07efd8 into rust-lang:master Jun 6, 2023
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Jun 10, 2023
Update cargo

12 commits in b0fa79679e717cd077b7fc0fa4166f47107f1ba9..49b6d9e179a91cf7645142541c9563443f64bf2b
2023-06-03 14:19:48 +0000 to 2023-06-09 17:21:19 +0000
- docs: doc comments for all registry kinds (rust-lang/cargo#12247)
- chore: Migrate print-ban from test to clippy (rust-lang/cargo#12246)
- fix: fetch nested git submodules (rust-lang/cargo#12244)
- refactor: registry source cleanup (rust-lang/cargo#12240)
- test: loose overly matches for git cli output (rust-lang/cargo#12241)
- fix: disable multiplexing on macOS for some versions of curl (rust-lang/cargo#12234)
- docs: doc comments for registry source and index (rust-lang/cargo#12239)
- doc: point to nightly cargo doc (rust-lang/cargo#12237)
- Upgrade to `gix` v0.45 for multi-round pack negotiations. (rust-lang/cargo#12236)
- refactor: git source cleanup (rust-lang/cargo#12197)
- Add message on reusing previous temporary path on failed cargo installs (rust-lang/cargo#12231)
- doc: the first line should be a simple sentence instead of a heading (rust-lang/cargo#12228)

r? `@ghost`
@ehuss ehuss added this to the 1.72.0 milestone Jun 22, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants