Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: handle empty response in Bedrock AnthropicProvider #14479

Merged

Conversation

sansmoraxz
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Add bounds check as response may be empty for bedrock anthropic api

New Package?

Did I fill in the tool.llamahub section in the pyproject.toml and provide a detailed README.md for my new integration or package?

  • Yes
  • No

Version Bump?

Did I bump the version in the pyproject.toml file of the package I am updating? (Except for the llama-index-core package)

  • Yes
  • No

Type of Change

Please delete options that are not relevant.

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • This change requires a documentation update

How Has This Been Tested?

Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details for your test configuration

  • Added new unit/integration tests
  • Added new notebook (that tests end-to-end)
  • I stared at the code and made sure it makes sense

Suggested Checklist:

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • I have added Google Colab support for the newly added notebooks.
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
  • I ran make format; make lint to appease the lint gods

@dosubot dosubot bot added the size:XS This PR changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label Jul 1, 2024
@sansmoraxz sansmoraxz changed the title feat: handle empty response in Bedrock AnthropicProvider fix: handle empty response in Bedrock AnthropicProvider Jul 1, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@nerdai nerdai left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @sansmoraxz -- left a minor comment in my review.

@@ -147,7 +147,9 @@ def get_text_from_stream_response(self, response: dict) -> str:
return ""

def get_text_from_response(self, response: dict) -> str:
return response["content"][0]["text"]
if response["content"]:
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I guess it's an Optional type?

nit (if this also works): return response["content"][0]["text"] or ""

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No it does not. It was my earlier implementation, when testing privately.

the content array may be empty, and index of list 0 will give 'list index out of range'.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Got it. Thanks for the reply.

@dosubot dosubot bot added the lgtm This PR has been approved by a maintainer label Jul 1, 2024
@nerdai nerdai merged commit f9d1be9 into run-llama:main Jul 1, 2024
8 checks passed
@logan-markewich
Copy link
Collaborator

fyi @sansmoraxz have you tried the bedrock converse api yet? The implementation is much more simple, supports native function calling, and is likely less error prone

@sansmoraxz
Copy link
Contributor Author

Sure. Will give it a try.

@sansmoraxz sansmoraxz deleted the fix/bedrock-anthropic-empty-response branch July 23, 2024 06:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
lgtm This PR has been approved by a maintainer size:XS This PR changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants