-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 469
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Added a way to list the product drive participants for a product drive #3762
Added a way to list the product drive participants for a product drive #3762
Conversation
Co-authored-by: Scott Steele <scottlsteele@gmail.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Left a couple comments, aside from which this looks good. Being a non Rails expert myself, maybe @awwaiid could give a quick skim for the Rails-idiomaticity?
Co-authored-by: Scott Steele <scottlsteele@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Scott Steele <scottlsteele@gmail.com>
I have addressed your feedback and it is ready for rereview. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM as far as trying out the functionality goes. Fine with it going forward if it passes technical review. @awwaiid ?
@@ -100,3 +100,48 @@ | |||
</div> | |||
</div> | |||
</section> | |||
|
|||
<section class="content"> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can we add a check in the request spec for this to see that the right information is being displayed? If there isn't a request spec, we should create one :)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I have added a test in my latest commit.
Thanks for the contribution! |
Resolves #3668
Description
Type of change
How Has This Been Tested?
Screenshots