spatsoc blog post #347
spatsoc blog post #347
Conversation
|
Thanks @robitalec ! I'll review this and get you feedback on Wednesday |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This post is SUCH A PLEASURE to read. The intro motivation for the package will entice readers. Nice clear explanations e.g. of SNA. Really. The whole thing is So Good.
I have a couple of minor suggestions:
- put spatsoc and package names in backticks
spatsoc - could you open a couple of issues to signal what you're thinking is needed? The tone of the post is very welcoming, so having an open issue or two is good.
- I'd love to include a caribou pic in tweet about this post, along with the matrix and graph. Could you share a link to one I can use? How do I credit the pic? (Of course you could add one to the post if you like - I think it would be a nice addition to a software post - they are, after all, the subject and give context. Completely up to you, but the caribou have my vote)
- the comment about Alec's love of testing reminded me of this post by a first-time reviewer: https://ropensci.org/blog/2018/03/13/ode-to-testing/
Thank you for doing this @robitalec et al. This makes rOpenSci look good 😄
|
Thank you @stefaniebutland, really appreciate your feedback!
We will include a caribou picture, great idea. I had a feeling we should have a few open issues, so I updated our CONTRIBUTING and issue labels. I'll have a couple issues opened in the next day or two and link them at the bottom of the post as well. Ahh that's a great post, thanks for the link! Makes me feel like we are missing music in our post... Ha! |
Just missing a link for the photographer's personal page! |
Let us know if there is anything else! |
|
Looks 💯thank you! |
Hello @stefaniebutland,
Here's our draft for a blog post about spatsoc, recently onboarded rOpenSci package (issue #237).
Thanks!