Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update PMP spec to use "memory operation" #1434

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Timmmm
Copy link

@Timmmm Timmmm commented May 29, 2024

This part of the spec was written before the RVWMO section which introduced the "memory operation" nomenclature.

This updates the section to talk about memory operations instead of memory accesses.

I also reworked the text about CMOs and PMPs because it didn't quite make sense - the access size is irrelevant for PMPs; it's the memory operation size that matters, and that can be anything for CMOs since they are allowed to be decomposed.

src/machine.adoc Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/cmo.adoc Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Member

@aswaterman aswaterman left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks. OK with me after my comments are addressed and @dkruckemyer-ventana weighs in.

This part of the spec was written before the RVWMO section which introduced the "memory operation" nomenclature.

This updates the section to talk about memory operations instead of memory accesses.

I also reworked the text about CMOs and PMPs because it didn't quite make sense - the access size is irrelevant for PMPs; it's the memory operation size that matters, and that can be anything for CMOs since they are allowed to be decomposed.
@Timmmm
Copy link
Author

Timmmm commented Jul 5, 2024

@dkruckemyer-ventana any opinion?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants