Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Migrate to updated shared-action-workflows name for CUDA 12 CI #438

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 18, 2023

Conversation

bdice
Copy link
Contributor

@bdice bdice commented Jul 18, 2023

This PR reverts changes to the branch of shared-action-workflows used for CUDA 12 testing. Now that rapidsai/shared-workflows#101 is merged, we can revert this.

@bdice bdice added improvement Improves an existing functionality non-breaking Introduces a non-breaking change labels Jul 18, 2023
@bdice bdice marked this pull request as ready for review July 18, 2023 19:17
@bdice bdice requested a review from a team as a code owner July 18, 2023 19:17
@raydouglass
Copy link
Member

/merge

@raydouglass raydouglass added improvement Improves an existing functionality and removed improvement Improves an existing functionality labels Jul 18, 2023
@jakirkham
Copy link
Member

The C++ tests are failing on CUDA 11.4 with the error below. Here's the failure on CI

The following tests FAILED:
	719 - cpm_libcudacxx-after_cpmfind-ninja (Failed)

@robertmaynard
Copy link
Contributor

Please remove the usage of the term revert, when this is an update to the new syntax. It reads as we are removing CUDA 12 CI entirely

@robertmaynard robertmaynard changed the title Revert CUDA 12.0 CI workflows to branch-23.08. Migrate to updated shared-action-workflows name for CUDA 12 CI Jul 18, 2023
@rapids-bot rapids-bot bot merged commit 37c6508 into rapidsai:branch-23.08 Jul 18, 2023
15 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
improvement Improves an existing functionality non-breaking Introduces a non-breaking change
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants