Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use new rapids-dask-dependency metapackage for managing dask versions #3991

Merged

Conversation

galipremsagar
Copy link
Contributor

Currently dask versions are pinned as part of every release cycle and then unpinned for the next development cycle across all of RAPIDS. This introduces a great deal of churn. To centralize the dependency, we have created a metapackage to manage the required dask version and this PR introduces that metapackage as a dependency of cugraph.

xref: rapidsai/cudf#14364

@galipremsagar galipremsagar added improvement Improvement / enhancement to an existing function non-breaking Non-breaking change labels Nov 8, 2023
@galipremsagar galipremsagar self-assigned this Nov 8, 2023
@galipremsagar galipremsagar requested a review from a team as a code owner November 8, 2023 20:20
@galipremsagar galipremsagar requested a review from a team as a code owner November 8, 2023 20:47
@galipremsagar galipremsagar requested a review from a team as a code owner November 13, 2023 18:59
Copy link

copy-pr-bot bot commented Nov 13, 2023

This pull request requires additional validation before any workflows can run on NVIDIA's runners.

Pull request vetters can view their responsibilities here.

Contributors can view more details about this message here.

@vyasr
Copy link
Contributor

vyasr commented Nov 13, 2023

/ok to test

@galipremsagar
Copy link
Contributor Author

/okay to test

@vyasr
Copy link
Contributor

vyasr commented Nov 14, 2023

/ok to test

@galipremsagar
Copy link
Contributor Author

/okay to test

@vyasr
Copy link
Contributor

vyasr commented Nov 14, 2023

/ok to test

@raydouglass raydouglass merged commit b90e1a5 into rapidsai:branch-23.12 Nov 14, 2023
71 of 73 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
improvement Improvement / enhancement to an existing function non-breaking Non-breaking change
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants