Skip to content

The workings for a very interesting exercise from the Econometrics of Financial Markets module of the MSc Quantitative Finance 2023/24 course at Bayes Business School (formerly Cass).

Notifications You must be signed in to change notification settings

radusbriciu/Realised-Volatility-Calculator

Repository files navigation

The workings for a very interesting exercise from the Econometrics of Financial Markets module of the MSc Quantitative Finance course at Bayes Business School (formerly Cass).

Excerpt from the paper:

An 𝑛 period realised volatility can be computed by the summation of all 𝑚 period squared returns within the 𝑛 period.

$$ \sigma^2_n = \sum_{i=1}^{m} r_i^2 $$

The use of alternative volatility measures is an important consideration when working with high-frequency data. Existing literature suggests there are significant benefits to using alternative dispersion measures in forecasting via stochastic volatility models. It is found by Blair, Poon, and Taylor (2001) that the VIX index is a coherent measure of volatility as evidenced through robust ARCH results and high degree of correlation between the VIX implied volatility and the realised volatility measured during the same periods. Andersen and Benzoni (2008) extend the discussion to a more generalised framework by developing concepts around the relation between conditional return variance against and their quadratic variation and realised volatility.

The study conducted by Blair, Poon, and Taylor (2001) demonstrates that using the VIX index to forecast volatility yields more accurate results compared to any conditional variance estimation method and choice of time series frequency. The VIX index naturally contains a greater amount of information pertaining to leverage effects and market perception by virtue of the VIX being a measure of implied volatility in the aggregated options market. It is also found that measures of realised volatility generally outperform the traditional counterparts, especially as a leading indicator of future volatility. The intuition behind realised volatility computed from high-frequency returns is that the data is closer to a continuous time representation. Intraday frequencies for long time series are considerably more granular than traditional approaches and will capture shorter-term dynamics of the data. Naturally, there are limitations in the fact that such high frequency will potentially also capture unwanted elements such as, microstructure noise, herding effects, or other idiosyncratic disruptions to the information content of the data.

About

The workings for a very interesting exercise from the Econometrics of Financial Markets module of the MSc Quantitative Finance 2023/24 course at Bayes Business School (formerly Cass).

Topics

Resources

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Releases

No releases published

Packages

No packages published