Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Setup Java for JBang purposes in the Flaky test workflow #2051

Conversation

michalvavrik
Copy link
Member

Summary

I run test here #2050 and it seems that I need to setup Java for the JBang https://github.com/quarkus-qe/quarkus-test-suite/actions/runs/11041992883/job/30673453268. I didn't experience this locally for obvious reasons.

Please select the relevant options.

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • Dependency update
  • Refactoring
  • Backport
  • New scenario (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • This change requires a documentation update
  • This change requires execution against OCP (use run tests phrase in comment)

Checklist:

  • Methods and classes used in PR scenarios are meaningful
  • Commits are well encapsulated and follow the best practices

@michalvavrik
Copy link
Member Author

@rsvoboda native failures are also happening in the daily build

@michalvavrik michalvavrik force-pushed the feature/add-java-setup-to-flaky-workflow branch from 6039d4b to 9a8b96c Compare September 26, 2024 08:14
@michalvavrik
Copy link
Member Author

Thanks, but let's not wait again till full CI finishes, this PR is not really tested by this CI. I'll wait for the formatting to pass (which is not testing it either) and merge it. The workflow that is changed in this PR only runs on the main repo, never on the fork. Thanks

@michalvavrik michalvavrik merged commit 1c1c5aa into quarkus-qe:main Sep 26, 2024
4 of 13 checks passed
@michalvavrik michalvavrik deleted the feature/add-java-setup-to-flaky-workflow branch September 26, 2024 08:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants