Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add new entry to .git-blame-ignore-revs #7781

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 31, 2023

Conversation

NicolasHug
Copy link
Member

To avoid blame noise from #7778

@pytorch-bot
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Jul 31, 2023

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/vision/7781

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

❌ 2 New Failures, 3 Unrelated Failures

As of commit 897714e:

NEW FAILURES - The following jobs have failed:

BROKEN TRUNK - The following jobs failed but were present on the merge base 332bff9:

👉 Rebase onto the `viable/strict` branch to avoid these failures

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@NicolasHug NicolasHug marked this pull request as ready for review July 31, 2023 15:54
Copy link
Contributor

@pmeier pmeier left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

@NicolasHug NicolasHug merged commit 8d4e879 into pytorch:main Jul 31, 2023
56 of 61 checks passed
@github-actions
Copy link

Hey @NicolasHug!

You merged this PR, but no labels were added. The list of valid labels is available at https://github.com/pytorch/vision/blob/main/.github/process_commit.py

facebook-github-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 25, 2023
Reviewed By: matteobettini

Differential Revision: D48642322

fbshipit-source-id: 6602628676e686cfaadf61eb985f4db47c2a5947
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants