Mask for Adversarial Attacks #1043
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looks great, thanks for the great work on this @jgonik as well as the thorough test cases!
There do seem to be some minor mypy failures in the CircleCI test results, can you look into resolving those? You can also run these locally using scripts/run_mypy.sh
|
Looks great, thanks! You can import this diff now, looks ready to merge. |
|
@jgonik has imported this pull request. If you are a Meta employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator. |
|
Hi @jgonik! Thank you for your pull request. We require contributors to sign our Contributor License Agreement, and yours needs attention. You currently have a record in our system, but the CLA is no longer valid, and will need to be resubmitted. ProcessIn order for us to review and merge your suggested changes, please sign at https://code.facebook.com/cla. If you are contributing on behalf of someone else (eg your employer), the individual CLA may not be sufficient and your employer may need to sign the corporate CLA. Once the CLA is signed, our tooling will perform checks and validations. Afterwards, the pull request will be tagged with If you have received this in error or have any questions, please contact us at cla@meta.com. Thanks! |
|
Thank you for signing our Contributor License Agreement. We can now accept your code for this (and any) Meta Open Source project. Thanks! |
Adds an optional mask argument to the FGSM and PGD adversarial attacks. This mask determines which pixels are affected by the adversarial perturbations. If no mask is specified, then all pixels are affected. This PR resolves #941.