Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[3.11] Fix PurePath.relative_to links in the pathlib documentation. (GH-93268) #93588

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 7, 2022

Conversation

miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

@miss-islington miss-islington commented Jun 7, 2022

These are currently broken as they refer to :meth:Path.relative_to rather than :meth:PurePath.relative_to, and relative_to is a method on PurePath.
(cherry picked from commit 8ef7929)

Co-authored-by: jacksonriley 52106215+jacksonriley@users.noreply.github.com

Automerge-Triggered-By: GH:brettcannon

…nGH-93268)

These are currently broken as they refer to :meth:`Path.relative_to` rather than :meth:`PurePath.relative_to`, and `relative_to` is a method on `PurePath`.
(cherry picked from commit 8ef7929)

Co-authored-by: jacksonriley <52106215+jacksonriley@users.noreply.github.com>
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

@jacksonriley and @brettcannon: Status check is done, and it's a failure ❌ .

@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

@miss-islington miss-islington merged commit f26d1b5 into python:3.11 Jun 7, 2022
@miss-islington miss-islington deleted the backport-8ef7929-3.11 branch June 7, 2022 19:11
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
docs Documentation in the Doc dir skip issue skip news
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants