Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Hug parens also with multiline unpacking #3992

Merged
merged 12 commits into from
Oct 30, 2023

Conversation

henriholopainen
Copy link
Contributor

@henriholopainen henriholopainen commented Oct 27, 2023

Description

As noted by @Avasam here, hugging parens with brackets on multiline dictionaries and lists as sole function parameters didn't take into account list/dict unpacking. This PR fixes that shortcoming.

Checklist - did you ...

  • Add an entry in CHANGES.md if necessary?
  • Add / update tests if necessary?
  • Add new / update outdated documentation?

@Avasam
Copy link

Avasam commented Oct 27, 2023

I only gave list/args as an example. But there's dict/kwargs unpacking too:

def foo(**kwargs):
    print(kwargs)


other = {"d": 4}

foo(**{
    "aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa": 1,
    "bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb": 2,
    "ccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccc": 3,
    **other,
})

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Oct 27, 2023

diff-shades results comparing this PR (79b8eca) to main (5edd993). The full diff is available in the logs under the "Generate HTML diff report" step.

╭──────────────────────── Summary ─────────────────────────╮
│ 6 projects & 85 files changed / 1725 changes [+738/-987] │
│                                                          │
│ ... out of 2 505 704 lines, 11 779 files & 23 projects   │
╰──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────╯

Differences found.

What is this? | Workflow run | diff-shades documentation

@henriholopainen
Copy link
Contributor Author

henriholopainen commented Oct 28, 2023

Hmm, the linting is failing. Should we format Black with the --preview style? If so, shouldn't that be caught with tox -e run_self?

edit: To answer my own question, the CI runs with pyproject.toml where --preview is set. I had disabled that locally, so run_self behaved differently. Fixed the failures and all is good now.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants