We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Source: #124 (comment)
Resolution: extend the EPeppolCertificateCheckResult with a NOT_CHECKED code and invoke the handler also, if the receiver check is disabled
EPeppolCertificateCheckResult
NOT_CHECKED
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Added enum NOT_CHECKED for phax/phase4#159
7b3c50a
Calling certificate consumer even if check is disabled; #159
b7c5f7a
Part of the next release @Lennert-vw fyi
Sorry, something went wrong.
phax
No branches or pull requests
Source: #124 (comment)
Resolution: extend the
EPeppolCertificateCheckResult
with aNOT_CHECKED
code and invoke the handler also, if the receiver check is disabledThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: