Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Added a tap test case to load multiple PPG extensions in the server before running a test load. #456

Merged

Conversation

Naeem-Akhter
Copy link
Contributor

Added a tap test case to load multiple PPG extensions in the server before running a test load.

  1. We load and create other extensions that are distributed by Percona in PPG. (postgis, pg_repack, pgaudit, pgaudit_set_user, pgpool)
  2. Run test data with pgbench.

To make the above test case work, updated the workflows to install above mentioned extension where we use installed packages from PPG. On workflows where we build server or use packages from PGDG, we are skipping this test case.

…efore running a test load.

1. We load and create other extensions that are distributed by Percona
   in PPG. (postgis, pg_repack, pgaudit, pgaudit_set_user, pgpool)
2. Run test data with pgbench.

To make the above test case work, updated the workflows to install above mentioned extension
where we use installed packages from PPG. On workflows where we build server or use packages
from PGDG, we are skipping this test case.
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 18, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 84.56%. Comparing base (2ebd163) to head (81cb2ab).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #456   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   84.56%   84.56%           
=======================================
  Files           3        3           
  Lines        1270     1270           
  Branches      196      196           
=======================================
  Hits         1074     1074           
  Misses         98       98           
  Partials       98       98           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@artemgavrilov
Copy link
Contributor

@Naeem-Akhter It looks like in this PR you accidentally changed permissions for t/expected/007_settings_pgsm_query_shared_buffer.out.15 file.

Screenshot 2024-04-19 at 12 40 19

@Naeem-Akhter
Copy link
Contributor Author

@Naeem-Akhter It looks like in this PR you accidentally changed permissions for t/expected/007_settings_pgsm_query_shared_buffer.out.15 file.

Screenshot 2024-04-19 at 12 40 19

No, it is intentional, to make it consistent with rest of the files.

@Naeem-Akhter Naeem-Akhter merged commit 5d7c424 into percona:main Apr 22, 2024
22 of 24 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants