Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jul 23, 2024. It is now read-only.

Fix: patchesStrategicMerge is deprecated use patches #453

Conversation

gciavarrini
Copy link
Contributor

What this PR does / why we need it:
The patchesStrategicMerge field is no longer supported and has been replaced with the patches field in the Kustomization file.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes
Fixes # FLPATH-477

Change type

  • New feature
  • Bug fix
  • Unit tests
  • Integration tests
  • CI
  • Documentation
  • Auto-generated SDK code

Impacted services

  • Workflow Service
  • Notification Service

Checklist

  • Subject and description added to both, commit and PR.
  • Relevant issues have been referenced.

The `patchesStrategicMerge` field is no longer supported and has been replaced with the `patches`
field in the Kustomization file.

Signed-off-by: Gloria Ciavarrini <gciavarrini@redhat.com>
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from lshannon and rgolangh June 20, 2023 14:39
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 20, 2023

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: masayag

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@masayag masayag requested a review from eloycoto June 20, 2023 15:25
@masayag
Copy link
Collaborator

masayag commented Jun 20, 2023

Thank you! @gciavarrini

@pkliczewski
Copy link
Collaborator

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm label Jun 20, 2023
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit f2bb45f into parodos-dev:main Jun 20, 2023
4 checks passed
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants