Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jul 23, 2024. It is now read-only.

Add WorkFlowExecutionResponseDTO #371

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 25, 2023

Conversation

masayag
Copy link
Collaborator

@masayag masayag commented May 24, 2023

What this PR does / why we need it:
The workflow execution response should contain less information than the WorkflowResopnseDTO.

Change type

  • New feature
  • Bug fix
  • Unit tests
  • Integration tests
  • CI
  • Documentation
  • Auto-generated SDK code

Impacted services

  • Workflow Service
  • Notification Service

Checklist

  • Subject and description added to both, commit and PR.
  • Relevant issues have been referenced.

The workflow execution response should contain less information than the
WorkflowResopnseDTO.

Signed-off-by: Moti Asayag <masayag@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Moti Asayag <masayag@redhat.com>
@masayag masayag requested a review from RichardW98 May 24, 2023 20:37
@masayag masayag requested review from gciavarrini and pkliczewski and removed request for eloycoto and pkliczewski May 24, 2023 20:37
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented May 24, 2023

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

Approval requirements bypassed by manually added approval.

This pull-request has been approved by:

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@gciavarrini
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm label May 25, 2023
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit db73d37 into parodos-dev:main May 25, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants