This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 15, 2023. It is now read-only.
contracts: Fix possible overflow in storage size calculation #7885
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
athei
added
A0-please_review
gui1117
approved these changes
Jan 12, 2021
NikVolf
approved these changes
Jan 14, 2021
|
bot merge |
|
Trying merge. |
ghost
merged commit
This pull request was closed.
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #2672
For the reasons explained in the linked issue we replace unchecked and saturating math by checked math. Every contract call that tries to accumulate more storage than can be hold by the
u32type will be trapped.It is extremely unlikely that such a large contract will be economically feasible.