Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CLN: Remove io.data and io.wb #18612

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 5, 2017

Conversation

gfyoung
Copy link
Member

@gfyoung gfyoung commented Dec 3, 2017

Deprecated in 0.17.0.

xref #13735.

@gfyoung gfyoung added Clean Deprecate Functionality to remove in pandas labels Dec 3, 2017
@gfyoung gfyoung added this to the 0.22.0 milestone Dec 3, 2017
@jreback
Copy link
Contributor

jreback commented Dec 3, 2017

any remaining docs ?

@gfyoung
Copy link
Member Author

gfyoung commented Dec 3, 2017

Didn't find anything that needed changing via GitHub search.

@jreback
Copy link
Contributor

jreback commented Dec 3, 2017

@gfyoung
Copy link
Member Author

gfyoung commented Dec 3, 2017

I checked it. What about it? There's nothing out-of-date with those docs.

@jreback
Copy link
Contributor

jreback commented Dec 4, 2017

let’s remove that section

@gfyoung
Copy link
Member Author

gfyoung commented Dec 4, 2017

So just delete remote_data.rst from the codebase?

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 4, 2017

Codecov Report

Merging #18612 into master will increase coverage by <.01%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master   #18612      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   91.44%   91.45%   +<.01%     
==========================================
  Files         157      155       -2     
  Lines       51449    51447       -2     
==========================================
+ Hits        47048    47051       +3     
+ Misses       4401     4396       -5
Flag Coverage Δ
#multiple 89.32% <ø> (+0.02%) ⬆️
#single 40.6% <ø> (-0.11%) ⬇️
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
pandas/io/gbq.py 25% <0%> (-58.34%) ⬇️
pandas/core/frame.py 97.81% <0%> (-0.1%) ⬇️
pandas/plotting/_converter.py 65.25% <0%> (+1.81%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update bd9a3e0...8541a0e. Read the comment docs.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 4, 2017

Codecov Report

Merging #18612 into master will decrease coverage by 0.01%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master   #18612      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   91.59%   91.58%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         155      153       -2     
  Lines       51255    51253       -2     
==========================================
- Hits        46949    46939      -10     
- Misses       4306     4314       +8
Flag Coverage Δ
#multiple 89.44% <ø> (ø) ⬆️
#single 40.67% <ø> (-0.11%) ⬇️
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
pandas/io/gbq.py 25% <0%> (-58.34%) ⬇️
pandas/util/testing.py 81.82% <0%> (-0.2%) ⬇️
pandas/core/frame.py 97.81% <0%> (-0.1%) ⬇️
pandas/core/indexes/datetimes.py 95.68% <0%> (+0.09%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 2c903d5...46cf498. Read the comment docs.

@@ -136,6 +136,7 @@ Removal of prior version deprecations/changes
- ``pd.tseries.util.pivot_annual`` has been removed (deprecated since v0.19). Use ``pivot_table`` instead (:issue:`18370`)
- ``pd.tseries.util.isleapyear`` has been removed (deprecated since v0.19). Use ``.is_leap_year`` property in Datetime-likes instead (:issue:`18370`)
- ``pd.ordered_merge`` has been removed (deprecated since v0.19). Use ``pd.merge_ordered`` instead (:issue:`18459`)
- The ``pandas.io.wb`` and ``pandas.io.data`` modules have been removed (:issue:`13735`)
Copy link
Member

@jorisvandenbossche jorisvandenbossche Dec 4, 2017

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would phrase this a bit differently, as now it seems the modules were still there, while there was just a shim that only raised an error.

Copy link
Member Author

@gfyoung gfyoung Dec 4, 2017

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What exactly would you say? It's a little tricky to describe the difference between now and then with regards to this change given that there was this ImportError phase. To be more precise about what changed is perhaps more relevant for a developer than the everyday user to be honest.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Well, the exact thing that changes is actually only the message of the import error, so maybe not worth to list at all?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Perhaps not, actually. @jreback , what do you think?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

these are really stub modules, which you could say.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fair enough, done.

@jreback
Copy link
Contributor

jreback commented Dec 4, 2017

remove remote_data.rst entirely as well.

@jreback jreback merged commit 52fefd5 into pandas-dev:master Dec 5, 2017
@jreback
Copy link
Contributor

jreback commented Dec 5, 2017

thanks!

@gfyoung gfyoung deleted the remove-wb-data branch December 5, 2017 04:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Clean Deprecate Functionality to remove in pandas
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants