Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

cache: rlock row by model #206

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 22, 2021
Merged

Conversation

jcaamano
Copy link
Collaborator

Fixes

WARNING: DATA RACE^M
Write at 0x00c058cc14d0 by goroutine 1665:^M
  runtime.mapassign()^M
      /usr/local/go/src/runtime/map.go:571 +0x0^M
  github.com/ovn-org/libovsdb/cache.(*RowCache).Create()^M
      /go/src/github.com/ovn-org/ovn-kubernetes/go-controller/vendor/github.com/ovn-org/libovsdb/cache/cache.go:147 +0xb35^M
  github.com/ovn-org/libovsdb/cache.(*TableCache).Populate()^M
      /go/src/github.com/ovn-org/ovn-kubernetes/go-controller/vendor/github.com/ovn-org/libovsdb/cache/cache.go:442 +0x5a5^M
  github.com/ovn-org/libovsdb/cache.(*TableCache).Update()^M
      /go/src/github.com/ovn-org/ovn-kubernetes/go-controller/vendor/github.com/ovn-org/libovsdb/cache/cache.go:396 +0x2da^M
  github.com/ovn-org/libovsdb/client.(*ovsdbClient).update()^M
      /go/src/github.com/ovn-org/ovn-kubernetes/go-controller/vendor/github.com/ovn-org/libovsdb/client/client.go:306 +0x1e5^M
  github.com/ovn-org/libovsdb/client.(*ovsdbClient).createRPC2Client.func2()^M
      /go/src/github.com/ovn-org/ovn-kubernetes/go-controller/vendor/github.com/ovn-org/libovsdb/client/client.go:236 +0x6d^M
  runtime.call64()^M
      /usr/local/go/src/runtime/asm_amd64.s:552 +0x3d^M
  reflect.Value.Call()^M
      /usr/local/go/src/reflect/value.go:337 +0xd8^M
  github.com/cenkalti/rpc2.(*Client).handleRequest()^M
      /go/src/github.com/ovn-org/ovn-kubernetes/go-controller/vendor/github.com/cenkalti/rpc2/client.go:134 +0x231^M
  github.com/cenkalti/rpc2.(*Client).readRequest()^M
      /go/src/github.com/ovn-org/ovn-kubernetes/go-controller/vendor/github.com/cenkalti/rpc2/client.go:184 +0x328^M
  github.com/cenkalti/rpc2.(*Client).readLoop()^M
      /go/src/github.com/ovn-org/ovn-kubernetes/go-controller/vendor/github.com/cenkalti/rpc2/client.go:93 +0x264^M
  github.com/cenkalti/rpc2.(*Client).Run()^M
      /go/src/github.com/ovn-org/ovn-kubernetes/go-controller/vendor/github.com/cenkalti/rpc2/client.go:62 +0x38^M
^M
Previous read at 0x00c058cc14d0 by goroutine 935:^M
  runtime.mapaccess2()^M
      /usr/local/go/src/runtime/map.go:452 +0x0^M
  github.com/ovn-org/libovsdb/cache.(*RowCache).RowByModel()^M
      /go/src/github.com/ovn-org/ovn-kubernetes/go-controller/vendor/github.com/ovn-org/libovsdb/cache/cache.go:109 +0x39e^M
  github.com/ovn-org/libovsdb/client.api.Get()^M
      /go/src/github.com/ovn-org/ovn-kubernetes/go-controller/vendor/github.com/ovn-org/libovsdb/client/api.go:219 +0xf5^M
  github.com/ovn-org/libovsdb/client.(*api).Get()^M
      <autogenerated>:1 +0x9b^M
  github.com/ovn-org/libovsdb/client.(*ovsdbClient).Get()^M
      /go/src/github.com/ovn-org/ovn-kubernetes/go-controller/vendor/github.com/ovn-org/libovsdb/client/client.go:587 +0x76^M
  github.com/ovn-org/ovn-kubernetes/go-controller/pkg/ovn.glob..func12.4.1.1.1.1()^M
      /go/src/github.com/ovn-org/ovn-kubernetes/go-controller/pkg/ovn/policy_test.go:1022 +0x151^M
  runtime.call64()^M
      /usr/local/go/src/runtime/asm_amd64.s:552 +0x3d^M
  reflect.Value.Call()^M
  ...

Signed-off-by: Jaime Caamaño Ruiz jcaamano@redhat.com

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Jul 22, 2021

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 1056237401

  • 2 of 2 (100.0%) changed or added relevant lines in 1 file are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage increased (+0.01%) to 77.18%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 1056075086: 0.01%
Covered Lines: 3186
Relevant Lines: 4128

💛 - Coveralls

@dave-tucker
Copy link
Collaborator

@jcaamano I thought this would be safe as the Rlock is acquired in r.Row
Here, we lock twice, which I think is fine with Rlocks, but I'm not sure it's ideal.

@jcaamano
Copy link
Collaborator Author

I think that access to r.indexes needs to be protected. And yeah, I thought there would be no problem rlocking twice.

@dave-tucker
Copy link
Collaborator

thanks @jcaamano if you can rebase, i'll merge it

Copy link
Collaborator

@dave-tucker dave-tucker left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Signed-off-by: Jaime Caamaño Ruiz <jcaamano@redhat.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants