Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve formats: COCO, Open Images, LFW #509

Merged
merged 20 commits into from
Oct 16, 2021
Merged

Conversation

sizov-kirill
Copy link

@sizov-kirill sizov-kirill commented Oct 11, 2021

Summary

LFW:

  • Made the file people.txt optional.
  • The location of the annotation files is not specified in the original dataset. So I added the annotations directory as in formats coco, open_images, mot etc.

COCO:

  • Added the opportunity to have _ character in subset names.
  • Allowed to have any annotation file name when only one task is selected.

Open Images:

  • Added the opportunity to import dataset without the image_ids_and_rotations.csv file.
  • Added reading classes name from class-description-boxable.csv file.

How to test

Checklist

License

  • I submit my code changes under the same MIT License that covers the project.
    Feel free to contact the maintainers if that's a concern.
  • I have updated the license header for each file (see an example below)
# Copyright (C) 2021 Intel Corporation
#
# SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT

@sizov-kirill sizov-kirill changed the title [WIP] Improve some formats Improve some formats Oct 15, 2021
@sizov-kirill sizov-kirill changed the title Improve some formats Improve formats: COCO, Open Images, LFW Oct 15, 2021
@zhiltsov-max
Copy link
Contributor

Ok, will you update format docs?

@sizov-kirill
Copy link
Author

Ok, will you update format docs?

Yes, I updated documentation for COCO and Open Images. Documentation for LFW format I'll add in other PR.

@zhiltsov-max zhiltsov-max merged commit 8e60add into develop Oct 16, 2021
@zhiltsov-max zhiltsov-max deleted the sk/improve-some-formats branch October 16, 2021 08:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants