Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add CVAT data format document #1060

Merged

Conversation

vinnamkim
Copy link
Contributor

@vinnamkim vinnamkim commented Jun 26, 2023

Summary

  • Ticket no. 112202
  • Add missing CVAT data format docs

How to test

Checklist

  • I have added unit tests to cover my changes.​
  • I have added integration tests to cover my changes.​
  • I have added the description of my changes into CHANGELOG.​
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly

License

  • I submit my code changes under the same MIT License that covers the project.
    Feel free to contact the maintainers if that's a concern.
  • I have updated the license header for each file (see an example below).
# Copyright (C) 2023 Intel Corporation
#
# SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT

Signed-off-by: Kim, Vinnam <vinnam.kim@intel.com>
@vinnamkim vinnamkim changed the title Add CVAT data format docs Add CVAT data format document Jun 26, 2023
@vinnamkim vinnamkim added the DOC Improvements or additions to documentation label Jun 26, 2023
@vinnamkim vinnamkim marked this pull request as ready for review June 26, 2023 09:43
@vinnamkim vinnamkim requested review from a team as code owners June 26, 2023 09:43
Signed-off-by: Kim, Vinnam <vinnam.kim@intel.com>
@vinnamkim vinnamkim merged commit 39c6d47 into openvinotoolkit:develop Jun 30, 2023
5 checks passed
@vinnamkim vinnamkim mentioned this pull request Jul 5, 2023
6 tasks
vinnamkim added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 6, 2023
- I missed to add the CVAT doc (from #1060) to the index.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
DOC Improvements or additions to documentation
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants