refactor: base properties configurable via registry #555
Conversation
WalkthroughThe recent changes enhance the Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://github.com/avatars/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (5)
- packages/builtinComponent/src/meta/index.js (1 hunks)
- packages/canvas/src/components/builtin/builtin.json (1 hunks)
- packages/controller/src/hooks/useProperties.js (2 hunks)
- packages/controller/src/hooks/useResource.js (3 hunks)
- packages/design-core/public/mock/bundle.json (1 hunks)
Additional context used
Biome
packages/controller/src/hooks/useResource.js
[error] 447-448: Avoid the use of spread (
...) syntax on accumulators. (lint/performance/noAccumulatingSpread)Spread syntax should be avoided on accumulators (like those in
.reduce) because it causes a time complexity ofO(n^2).
Consider methods such as .splice or .push instead.
Additional comments not posted (11)
packages/builtinComponent/src/meta/index.js (3)
20-33: The addition of theidproperty with its configuration looks good.
36-49: The addition of theclassNameproperty with its configuration looks good.
52-65: The addition of therefproperty with its configuration looks good.packages/controller/src/hooks/useProperties.js (1)
Line range hint
1-1: Removal ofpatchOtherNamefunction call simplifies property handling. Ensure this change does not affect other functionalities.Verification successful
The removal of the
patchOtherNamefunction does not affect other functionalities as there are no remaining references to it in the codebase.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the removal of `patchOtherName` does not affect other functionalities. # Test: Search for any remaining references to `patchOtherName`. Expect: No occurrences. rg --type javascript $'patchOtherName'Length of output: 72
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the removal of `patchOtherName` does not affect other functionalities. # Test: Search for any remaining references to `patchOtherName`. Expect: No occurrences. rg --type js $'patchOtherName'Length of output: 29
packages/controller/src/hooks/useResource.js (1)
78-87: Handling ofbasePropsinregisterComponentfunction is implemented correctly to avoid property duplication.packages/canvas/src/components/builtin/builtin.json (3)
526-539: The addition of theidproperty in the JSON configuration is correctly implemented.
542-555: The addition of theclassNameproperty in the JSON configuration is correctly implemented.
558-571: The addition of therefproperty in the JSON configuration is correctly implemented.packages/design-core/public/mock/bundle.json (3)
14296-14312: Configuration for theidproperty looks comprehensive and well-defined.
14313-14328: Configuration for theclassNameproperty is consistent and correctly implemented.
14329-14344: Configuration for therefproperty is consistent and aligns with the project's standards.
|
@coderabbitai review this pull request |
|
@gene9831, I have reviewed the changes made in the pull request. Here are the key points:
Please consider adding the necessary tests and updating the documentation. If you need help with generating unit tests or any further analysis, feel free to ask! Actions performedReview triggered.
|
|
@gene9831, I have reviewed the changes made in the pull request. Here are the key points:
Please consider adding the necessary tests and updating the documentation. If you need help with generating unit tests or any further analysis, feel free to ask! Actions performedReview triggered.
|
…to refactor/base-properties
gene9831
changed the title
|
@coderabbitai review |
Actions performedReview triggered.
|
|
@coderabbitai review |
Actions performedReview triggered.
|
|
Note Currently processing new changes in this PR. This may take a few minutes, please wait... Files selected for processing (4)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (4)
- packages/plugins/materials/index.js (1 hunks)
- packages/plugins/materials/src/composable/useMaterial.js (2 hunks)
- packages/plugins/materials/src/js/options.js (1 hunks)
- packages/settings/props/src/composable/useProperties.js (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- packages/plugins/materials/src/js/options.js
Additional comments not posted (8)
packages/plugins/materials/index.js (2)
20-20: Import statement looks good.The import statement for
basePropertyOptionsis correctly added.
28-29: Integration ofbasePropertyOptionsin options object looks good.The
basePropertyOptionsis correctly included in theoptionsobject. Ensure that thebasePropertyOptionsis properly defined and used in the rest of the codebase.packages/settings/props/src/composable/useProperties.js (3)
Line range hint
1-1: File header looks good.The file header contains the correct licensing information.
Line range hint
1-1: Modification ofgetPropslooks good.The
getPropsfunction has been modified to remove the call topatchOtherName. Ensure that this modification does not affect the functionality.
Line range hint
1-1: Ensure removal ofotherBaseKeyandpatchOtherNameis justified.The
otherBaseKeyandpatchOtherNamehave been removed. Ensure that their functionality is no longer needed or is handled elsewhere.Verification successful
Removal of
otherBaseKeyandpatchOtherNameis justified.The search did not find any occurrences of
otherBaseKeyandpatchOtherNamein the codebase, indicating that their functionality is no longer needed.
otherBaseKeypatchOtherNameScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that `otherBaseKey` and `patchOtherName` are no longer needed. # Test: Search for the usage of `otherBaseKey` and `patchOtherName`. Expect: No occurrences. rg --type python $'otherBaseKey' rg --type python $'patchOtherName'Length of output: 127
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that `otherBaseKey` and `patchOtherName` are no longer needed. # Test: Search for the usage of `otherBaseKey` and `patchOtherName`. Expect: No occurrences. rg --type js 'otherBaseKey' rg --type js 'patchOtherName'Length of output: 57
packages/plugins/materials/src/composable/useMaterial.js (3)
17-18: New import statements look good.The import statements for
getOptionsandmetaare correctly added.
80-106: FunctionpatchBasePropsimplementation looks good.The
patchBasePropsfunction is correctly implemented to handle base properties configuration. Ensure thatgetOptionsandmeta.idare correctly defined and used.
113-114: Modification ofregisterComponentToResourcelooks good.The
registerComponentToResourcefunction has been correctly modified to incorporatepatchBaseProps.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (2)
- packages/plugins/materials/src/composable/useMaterial.js (2 hunks)
- packages/plugins/materials/src/js/options.js (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- packages/plugins/materials/src/composable/useMaterial.js
- packages/plugins/materials/src/js/options.js
…to refactor/base-properties
|
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- packages/plugins/materials/src/composable/useMaterial.js (2 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (3)
packages/plugins/materials/src/composable/useMaterial.js (3)
85-88: EnsureschemaPropertiesis an array.The function checks if
schemaPropertiesis an array and returns early if not. This is a good practice to prevent errors. Ensure that the calling code handles non-array cases appropriately.
90-112: Verify group matching logic and insertion position.The logic for matching groups and inserting base properties based on
insertPositionis well-implemented. However, verify thatgetOptions(meta.id)always returns valid data, and consider handling cases wherebasePropertyOptionsmight be undefined.
121-122: Integration ofpatchBasePropsin component registration.The call to
patchBasePropsensures that schema properties are enhanced with base properties during component registration. Verify that all components passed to this function have their schema properties defined.Verification successful
Schema Properties are Defined for Registered Components
The
builtin.jsonfile confirms that components registered throughregisterComponentToResourcehave their schema properties defined. The integration ofpatchBasePropsis valid and ensures that these properties are processed correctly during component registration.
- The
Builtin.data.materialsstructure includesschemaproperties for each component, supporting the intended functionality.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that all components registered have their schema properties defined. # Test: Search for `registerComponentToResource` usage and ensure schema properties are passed. rg --type javascript $'registerComponentToResource'Length of output: 85
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that all components registered have their schema properties defined. # Test: Search for `registerComponentToResource` usage and ensure schema properties are passed. rg --type js $'registerComponentToResource'Length of output: 551
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the structure of `materials`, `Builtin.data.materials`, and `BuiltinComponentMaterials` to ensure schema properties are defined. # Search for the definition and structure of `materials`. rg --type js 'materials =' # Search for the definition and structure of `Builtin.data.materials`. rg --type js 'Builtin.data.materials =' # Search for the definition and structure of `BuiltinComponentMaterials`. rg --type js 'BuiltinComponentMaterials ='Length of output: 458
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for the usage or definition of `Builtin` and `BuiltinComponentMaterials` to gather more information about their structure. # Search for the definition or usage of `Builtin`. rg --type js 'Builtin' # Search for the definition or usage of `BuiltinComponentMaterials`. rg --type js 'BuiltinComponentMaterials'Length of output: 1589
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Inspect the contents of the `builtin.json` file to verify the presence of schema properties. # Display the contents of `builtin.json` to check for schema properties. cat packages/canvas/render/src/builtin/builtin.jsonLength of output: 16103
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (6)
- designer-demo/public/mock/bundle.json (2 hunks)
- mockServer/src/assets/json/appinfo.json (4 hunks)
- mockServer/src/assets/json/bundle.json (2 hunks)
- packages/engine-cli/template/designer/public/mock/bundle.json (2 hunks)
- packages/settings/design/src/schemas/grid.json (1 hunks)
- packages/settings/design/src/schemas/search.json (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (6)
- designer-demo/public/mock/bundle.json
- mockServer/src/assets/json/appinfo.json
- mockServer/src/assets/json/bundle.json
- packages/engine-cli/template/designer/public/mock/bundle.json
- packages/settings/design/src/schemas/grid.json
- packages/settings/design/src/schemas/search.json
English | 简体中文
PR
PR Checklist
Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:
PR Type
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Background and solution
What is the current behavior?
Issue Number: N/A
What is the new behavior?
组件物料的基础属性可配置化
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
Other information
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
basePropertyOptionsto the materials plugin for enhanced property configurations.patchBasePropsto improve schema property management.Bug Fixes
Documentation