Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

reset neuron data on registration #522

Open
wants to merge 5 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

andreea-popescu-reef
Copy link

Description

On neuron registration the trust, emission, consensus, incentive, dividends values as well as axon info associated with the assigned neuron_uid are inherited from the previous neuron. Thus for the first few blocks after registration these values will be wrong, then reset to zero and then get populated with the correct values for the newly registered neuron. This change resets these values on neuron registration.

Related Issue(s)

N/A

Type of Change

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • Documentation update
  • Other (please describe):

Breaking Change

no

Checklist

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have run cargo fmt and cargo clippy to ensure my code is formatted and linted correctly
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
  • Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules

Screenshots (if applicable)

N/A

Additional Notes

N/A

@andreea-popescu-reef
Copy link
Author

@distributedstatemachine I don't think I'm doing any math operations

@distributedstatemachine
Copy link
Contributor

Apologies @andreea-popescu-reef , i

meant unsafe , or potentially panicing operation. @keithtensor can you take a look ? the CI should catch these

@@ -9,6 +9,22 @@ impl<T: Config> Pallet<T> {
SubnetworkN::<T>::get(netuid)
}

pub fn set_emission_for_uid(netuid: u16, neuron_uid: u16, emission: u64) {
Emission::<T>::mutate(netuid, |v| v[neuron_uid as usize] = emission);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could this direct indexing panic? cc @keithtensor

@@ -9,6 +9,15 @@ impl<T: Config> Pallet<T> {
SubnetworkN::<T>::get(netuid)
}

/// Resets the trust, emission, consensus, incentive, dividends of the neuron to default
pub fn clear_neuron(netuid: u16, neuron_uid: u16) {
Emission::<T>::mutate(netuid, |v| v[neuron_uid as usize] = 0);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

can you add the length check before index with neuron_uid.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

added

@@ -9,6 +9,26 @@ impl<T: Config> Pallet<T> {
SubnetworkN::<T>::get(netuid)
}

fn clear_element_at<N>(position: u16) -> impl Fn(&mut Vec<N>)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We are almost there! can you please add doc comments to this , as it would break some lints down the line.

I will get this approved today , and move it through our deployment process. I estimate this change would be on testnet in about 2 weeks

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

right, added.

thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants