Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Backport 2.x - Remote Store - Dual Replication] Create missing Retention Leases for docrep shard copies during failover #13364

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 24, 2024

Conversation

shourya035
Copy link
Member

Description

Backporting #13159 to 2.x

Related Issues

Resolves #13158

Check List

  • New functionality includes testing.
    • All tests pass
  • New functionality has been documented.
    • New functionality has javadoc added
  • Failing checks are inspected and point to the corresponding known issue(s) (See: Troubleshooting Failing Builds)
  • Commits are signed per the DCO using --signoff
  • Commit changes are listed out in CHANGELOG.md file (See: Changelog)
  • Public documentation issue/PR created

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.
For more information on following Developer Certificate of Origin and signing off your commits, please check here.

Copy link
Contributor

❌ Gradle check result for 62fcb0f: FAILURE

Please examine the workflow log, locate, and copy-paste the failure(s) below, then iterate to green. Is the failure a flaky test unrelated to your change?

… docrep shard copies during failover (opensearch-project#13159)

Signed-off-by: Shourya Dutta Biswas <114977491+shourya035@users.noreply.github.com>
(cherry picked from commit 3c8eafd)
Copy link
Contributor

❕ Gradle check result for 2fd5e1c: UNSTABLE

  • TEST FAILURES:
      1 org.opensearch.cluster.MinimumClusterManagerNodesIT.testThreeNodesNoClusterManagerBlock

Please review all flaky tests that succeeded after retry and create an issue if one does not already exist to track the flaky failure.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 24, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 70.00000% with 3 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 71.23%. Comparing base (0dd892c) to head (2fd5e1c).
Report is 172 commits behind head on 2.x.

Files Patch % Lines
...org/opensearch/index/seqno/ReplicationTracker.java 70.00% 0 Missing and 3 partials ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##                2.x   #13364      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     71.28%   71.23%   -0.06%     
- Complexity    60145    60657     +512     
============================================
  Files          4957     5005      +48     
  Lines        282799   285485    +2686     
  Branches      41409    41738     +329     
============================================
+ Hits         201591   203352    +1761     
- Misses        64189    64975     +786     
- Partials      17019    17158     +139     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@gbbafna gbbafna merged commit 5628cc8 into opensearch-project:2.x Apr 24, 2024
27 of 28 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants