Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

geoparquet.md: refer to OGC spec for WKB instead of ISO #54

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Apr 15, 2022

Conversation

rouault
Copy link
Contributor

@rouault rouault commented Apr 1, 2022

There's actually a OGC spec that describes WKB, and is in-line with ISO 13249-3 (SQL/MM Part 3: Spatial), except that the OGC spec doesn't define the CircularString, CompoundCurve and CurvePolygon classes but reserve the same number as SQL/MM Part 3.

There's actually a OGC spec that describes WKB, and is in-line with ISO 13249-3 (SQL/MM Part 3: Spatial), except that the OGC spec doesn't define the CircularString, CompoundCurve and CurvePolygon classes but reserve the same number as SQL/MM Part 3.
@alasarr
Copy link
Collaborator

alasarr commented Apr 11, 2022

@jorisvandenbossche as you wrote that part. Are you ok with this PR?

@jorisvandenbossche
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks! It's indeed good to refer to an official spec.
I would maybe still keep a mention of "ISO" as alternative name (or a reference to the ISO standard) for people who know it by that name?

format-specs/geoparquet.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@rouault
Copy link
Contributor Author

rouault commented Apr 15, 2022

I would maybe still keep a mention of "ISO" as alternative name (or a reference to the ISO standard) for people who know it by that name?

link to the corresponding ISO SQL MM / Part 3 language added

@jorisvandenbossche
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks!

@jorisvandenbossche jorisvandenbossche merged commit 9151b87 into opengeospatial:main Apr 15, 2022
@cholmes cholmes added this to the 0.2 milestone Apr 18, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants