You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
If the crs field is not included then the data in this column must be stored in longitude, latitude based on the WGS84 datum, and CRS-aware implementations should assume a default value of OGC:CRS84
This is weird. Is it the default value or not? Stating that this might be the default value is not very helpful.
So I propose to rephrase to something like:
The default CRS is OGC:CRS84, which means the data in this column must be stored in longitude, latitude based on the WGS84 datum.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
m-mohr
changed the title
crs fields it too vague
crs fields is too vague
Dec 5, 2022
m-mohr
changed the title
crs fields is too vague
Default value of the crs fields is too vague
Dec 5, 2022
m-mohr
changed the title
Default value of the crs fields is too vague
Default value of the crs field is too vague
Dec 5, 2022
* The default value of the crs field is required #152
* Update chapter below, too
* Apply suggestions from code review
* Update format-specs/geoparquet.md
* Update format-specs/geoparquet.md
Co-authored-by: Tim Schaub <tschaub@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Tim Schaub <tschaub@users.noreply.github.com>
The CRS field states (bold text by me):
This is weird. Is it the default value or not? Stating that this might be the default value is not very helpful.
So I propose to rephrase to something like:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: