Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Runtime] Fix formatting and clarify status values #578

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

RobDolinMS
Copy link
Collaborator

When reading the PDF, this line is not clear if it applies just to status or to all state values

Signed-off-by: Rob Dolin robdolin@microsoft.com

When reading the PDF, this line is not clear if it applies just to status or to all state values

Signed-off-by: Rob Dolin <robdolin@microsoft.com>

Additional values MAY be defined by the runtime, however, they MUST be used to represent new runtime states not defined above.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe if we use a four-space indent? Possibly missed by #495.

@RobDolinMS
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Tagging @vbatts to take a look. Thanks in advance.

@mrunalp
Copy link
Contributor

mrunalp commented Sep 20, 2016

LGTM

Approved with PullApprove

@hqhq
Copy link
Contributor

hqhq commented Sep 21, 2016

I think we should use a four-space indent here as suggested by @wking

@hqhq
Copy link
Contributor

hqhq commented Oct 5, 2016

@RobDolinMS Can you check if the four-space indent fixes your problem? I've tested and it looks good to me. Put that sentence with these states doesn't look reasonable to me.

hqhq added a commit to hqhq/runtime-spec that referenced this pull request Nov 3, 2016
This carries opencontainers#578 and fixes some other format issues.

Signed-off-by: Qiang Huang <h.huangqiang@huawei.com>
@hqhq
Copy link
Contributor

hqhq commented Nov 3, 2016

@RobDolinMS I've carried this in #608 , so I'll close this one, thanks.

@hqhq hqhq closed this Nov 3, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants