Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Copy the current OpenCensus protos. #134

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Apr 17, 2019
Merged

Copy the current OpenCensus protos. #134

merged 3 commits into from
Apr 17, 2019

Conversation

bogdandrutu
Copy link
Member

  • This PR only modifies the packages, copyright and authors from the initial files.
  • Follow up PRs will update the protos in order to keep a history.
  • In the final state the protos will be moved to a different repo and a Java artifact will be generated from there, but for the moment we keep them here.

Copy link
Member

@SergeyKanzhelev SergeyKanzhelev left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

So you need a sign off on copy of files, all the modifications will come later, correct?

@bogdandrutu bogdandrutu force-pushed the protos branch 3 times, most recently from 936d9b9 to 5f3ab17 Compare April 17, 2019 20:22
@bogdandrutu bogdandrutu merged commit 6928ae2 into master Apr 17, 2019
@bogdandrutu bogdandrutu deleted the protos branch April 17, 2019 21:07
tigrannajaryan added a commit to tigrannajaryan/opentelemetry-proto that referenced this pull request Jan 10, 2023
…received

This is considered an bug in the spec that was uncovered in the discussion here:
open-telemetry#442 (comment)

I did some spelunking and the "generate" recommendation comes from the very first commit:
open-telemetry@b5bcfff#diff-ef5f80fbf835dd57e14cb9264944f03d80cf6b04cc7671b0e7fb33167c67efcc
where they were copied from Java repo, to which they were copied from OpenCensus
open-telemetry/opentelemetry-java#134 and in OpenCensus the
wording first time appeared here census-instrumentation/opencensus-proto#160
(authored by @SergeyKanzhelev, merged by @bogdandrutu).

We are deleting the requirement to generate a new trace id or span id if an invalid
id is received. The receivers can decide how they want to treat the invalid id (just
like upon receiving any other invalid id), e.g. they may drop it, log an error, accept
the invalid data, etc. We are not going to prescribe a particular receiver behavior
when invalid trace/span id is received.
tigrannajaryan added a commit to open-telemetry/opentelemetry-proto that referenced this pull request Jan 20, 2023
…received (#444)

This is considered an bug in the spec that was uncovered in the discussion here:
#442 (comment)

I did some spelunking and the "generate" recommendation comes from the very first commit:
b5bcfff#diff-ef5f80fbf835dd57e14cb9264944f03d80cf6b04cc7671b0e7fb33167c67efcc
where they were copied from Java repo, to which they were copied from OpenCensus
open-telemetry/opentelemetry-java#134 and in OpenCensus the
wording first time appeared here census-instrumentation/opencensus-proto#160
(authored by @SergeyKanzhelev, merged by @bogdandrutu).

We are deleting the requirement to generate a new trace id or span id if an invalid
id is received. The receivers can decide how they want to treat the invalid id (just
like upon receiving any other invalid id), e.g. they may drop it, log an error, accept
the invalid data, etc. We are not going to prescribe a particular receiver behavior
when invalid trace/span id is received.
VinozzZ pushed a commit to VinozzZ/opentelemetry-proto that referenced this pull request Jun 21, 2024
…received (open-telemetry#444)

This is considered an bug in the spec that was uncovered in the discussion here:
open-telemetry#442 (comment)

I did some spelunking and the "generate" recommendation comes from the very first commit:
open-telemetry@b5bcfff#diff-ef5f80fbf835dd57e14cb9264944f03d80cf6b04cc7671b0e7fb33167c67efcc
where they were copied from Java repo, to which they were copied from OpenCensus
open-telemetry/opentelemetry-java#134 and in OpenCensus the
wording first time appeared here census-instrumentation/opencensus-proto#160
(authored by @SergeyKanzhelev, merged by @bogdandrutu).

We are deleting the requirement to generate a new trace id or span id if an invalid
id is received. The receivers can decide how they want to treat the invalid id (just
like upon receiving any other invalid id), e.g. they may drop it, log an error, accept
the invalid data, etc. We are not going to prescribe a particular receiver behavior
when invalid trace/span id is received.
VinozzZ pushed a commit to VinozzZ/opentelemetry-proto that referenced this pull request Jun 21, 2024
…received (open-telemetry#444)

This is considered an bug in the spec that was uncovered in the discussion here:
open-telemetry#442 (comment)

I did some spelunking and the "generate" recommendation comes from the very first commit:
open-telemetry@b5bcfff#diff-ef5f80fbf835dd57e14cb9264944f03d80cf6b04cc7671b0e7fb33167c67efcc
where they were copied from Java repo, to which they were copied from OpenCensus
open-telemetry/opentelemetry-java#134 and in OpenCensus the
wording first time appeared here census-instrumentation/opencensus-proto#160
(authored by @SergeyKanzhelev, merged by @bogdandrutu).

We are deleting the requirement to generate a new trace id or span id if an invalid
id is received. The receivers can decide how they want to treat the invalid id (just
like upon receiving any other invalid id), e.g. they may drop it, log an error, accept
the invalid data, etc. We are not going to prescribe a particular receiver behavior
when invalid trace/span id is received.
VinozzZ pushed a commit to VinozzZ/opentelemetry-proto that referenced this pull request Jun 21, 2024
…received (open-telemetry#444)

This is considered an bug in the spec that was uncovered in the discussion here:
open-telemetry#442 (comment)

I did some spelunking and the "generate" recommendation comes from the very first commit:
open-telemetry@b5bcfff#diff-ef5f80fbf835dd57e14cb9264944f03d80cf6b04cc7671b0e7fb33167c67efcc
where they were copied from Java repo, to which they were copied from OpenCensus
open-telemetry/opentelemetry-java#134 and in OpenCensus the
wording first time appeared here census-instrumentation/opencensus-proto#160
(authored by @SergeyKanzhelev, merged by @bogdandrutu).

We are deleting the requirement to generate a new trace id or span id if an invalid
id is received. The receivers can decide how they want to treat the invalid id (just
like upon receiving any other invalid id), e.g. they may drop it, log an error, accept
the invalid data, etc. We are not going to prescribe a particular receiver behavior
when invalid trace/span id is received.
VinozzZ pushed a commit to VinozzZ/opentelemetry-proto that referenced this pull request Jun 21, 2024
…received (open-telemetry#444)

This is considered an bug in the spec that was uncovered in the discussion here:
open-telemetry#442 (comment)

I did some spelunking and the "generate" recommendation comes from the very first commit:
open-telemetry@b5bcfff#diff-ef5f80fbf835dd57e14cb9264944f03d80cf6b04cc7671b0e7fb33167c67efcc
where they were copied from Java repo, to which they were copied from OpenCensus
open-telemetry/opentelemetry-java#134 and in OpenCensus the
wording first time appeared here census-instrumentation/opencensus-proto#160
(authored by @SergeyKanzhelev, merged by @bogdandrutu).

We are deleting the requirement to generate a new trace id or span id if an invalid
id is received. The receivers can decide how they want to treat the invalid id (just
like upon receiving any other invalid id), e.g. they may drop it, log an error, accept
the invalid data, etc. We are not going to prescribe a particular receiver behavior
when invalid trace/span id is received.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants