Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Migrate QARepVGG from YOLOv6 to MMYOLO #856

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: dev
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

xin-li-67
Copy link
Contributor

Motivation

Migrate the QARepVGG implementation from the official YOLOv6 repository and the deployment process using both the easydeploy and MMDeploy.

Modification

configs/yolov6/qarepvgg/*
mmyolo/models/layers/init.py
mmyolo/models/layers/yolo_bricks.py
mmyolo/utils/misc.py
projects/easydeploy/

BC-breaking (Optional)

Does the modification introduce changes that break the backward compatibility of the downstream repos?
If so, please describe how it breaks the compatibility and how the downstream projects should modify their code to keep compatibility with this PR.

Use cases (Optional)

If this PR introduces a new feature, it is better to list some use cases here and update the documentation.

Checklist

  1. Pre-commit or other linting tools are used to fix potential lint issues.
  2. The modification is covered by complete unit tests. If not, please add more unit tests to ensure the correctness.
  3. If the modification has a potential influence on downstream projects, this PR should be tested with downstream projects, like MMDetection or MMClassification.
  4. The documentation has been modified accordingly, like docstring or example tutorials.

@xin-li-67 xin-li-67 changed the title [WIP] Support QARepVGG in YOLOv6 Migrate QARepVGG from YOLOv6 to MMYOLO Aug 18, 2023
@RangeKing RangeKing added the algorithm Add or imporve algorithm label Aug 24, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
algorithm Add or imporve algorithm
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants