README update due to feedback in #9

[VincentTam]

I hope I get you correctly in #9 (comment). Here's some explanations to the words that I'm using.

• "offiical": work in the repo/domain of the app/project's owner. In this case, the GitHub repo for Staticman and anything under the domain *.staticman.net would be regarded as "official".
• "public": accessible by netizens from countries/regions not subject to any form of internet censorship (e.g. GFW). For example, the Statimcan bots @staticmanlab, @staticmanaima, @staticwalrus, etc.

I've started this PR instead of directly pushing it into the repo to allow discussion before any actual commit against the master branch. Besides, I treat each Git branch as an independent feature. Even though it's good to branch from current stable version to include recent updates and avoid bugs, I didn't include the recently merged PR to avoid obfuscating the commit history of the branch VincentTam:smapich to be merged.

[onweru]

I hope I get you correctly in #9 (comment). Here's some explanations to the words that I'm using.

• "offiical": work in the repo/domain of the app/project's owner. In this case, the GitHub repo for Staticman and anything under the domain *.staticman.net would be regarded as "official".
• "public": accessible by netizens from countries/regions not subject to any form of internet censorship (e.g. GFW). For example, the Statimcan bots @staticmanlab, @staticmanaima, @staticwalrus, etc.

I've started this PR instead of directly pushing it into the repo to allow discussion before any actual commit against the master branch. Besides, I treat each Git branch as an independent feature. Even though it's good to branch from current stable version to include recent updates and avoid bugs, I didn't include the recently merged PR to avoid obfuscating the commit history of the branch VincentTam:smapich to be merged.

@VincentTam, well said, I get your approach; discretion is a good thing to have. My request was discretionary, just ensuring that we didn't overlook something. Seeing that you're a thorough person, I would be ok with the README as is, if you think the staticman part is adequately documented.