Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test: fix error message check #5986

Closed
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
4 changes: 2 additions & 2 deletions test/sequential/test-module-loading.js
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -247,12 +247,12 @@ assert.deepEqual(children, {
assert.throws(function() {
console.error('require non-string');
require({ foo: 'bar' });
}, 'path must be a string or Buffer');
}, /path must be a string/);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is more lenient. The test will still pass if the old message is returned right?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, but for this particular one, the message never included the or Buffer, that was a mis-edit that was missed when the buffers-in-fs pr was landed.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@thefourtheye Just in case there's a misunderstanding: This is not more lenient than the current test, although it appears more lenient thanks to the unfortunate way the assert.throws() API works.

The way it is without this PR, any throw will result in the test passing. The string ('path must be a string or Buffer') is not checked at all. Instead, that string is used as the message provided by the AssertionError that fires if the function does not throw. Fun, right?

Changing it to a RegExp the way this PR does means that it will be used to confirm the message in the Error thrown by the function, which is probably what was intended in the first place.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

PR to document that pitfall: #6029

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Cool, Thanks :-)


assert.throws(function() {
console.error('require empty string');
require('');
}, 'missing path');
}, /missing path/);

process.on('exit', function() {
assert.ok(a.A instanceof Function);
Expand Down