tools: remove excessive comments from .eslintrc #5151
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Once #5135 lands, the diff should look like what you see at Trott@cc99a75 |
| @@ -17,98 +17,60 @@ ecmaFeatures: | |||
| rules: | |||
| # Possible Errors | |||
| # list: https://github.com/eslint/eslint/tree/master/docs/rules#possible-errors | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Maybe also remove list: from each section?
|
LGTM with suggestion. |
|
Oh by the way, the commit title |
Trott
changed the title
|
Commit message fixed, |
|
CI looks good, except for a Windows buildbot issue on one host. Shouldn't really affect anything because this is a linting tool change and nothing else, but I like my CIs green (or at least yellow), so let's try again: |
|
#5135 landed. Is this one ready to go? Looks like it might need a quick rebase. |
The comments make the config hard to scan. They do not provide any information that isn't in the documentation links referred to in comments (that are not being removed here). Additionally, all rule config sections are alphabetically ordered for easier scanning etc.
|
Rebased. New CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/1627/ |
|
LGTM |
|
Unrelated known-ish flaky being addressed in another issue (and hopefully soon a PR), but otherwise, everything is OK. |
Trott
added a commit
to Trott/io.js
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 10, 2016
The comments make the config hard to scan. They do not provide any information that isn't in the documentation links referred to in comments (that are not being removed here). Additionally, all rule config sections are alphabetically ordered for easier scanning etc. PR-URL: nodejs#5151 Reviewed-By: Roman Reiss <me@silverwind.io>
|
Landed in 783a563 |
rvagg
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 15, 2016
The comments make the config hard to scan. They do not provide any information that isn't in the documentation links referred to in comments (that are not being removed here). Additionally, all rule config sections are alphabetically ordered for easier scanning etc. PR-URL: #5151 Reviewed-By: Roman Reiss <me@silverwind.io>
MylesBorins
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 18, 2016
The comments make the config hard to scan. They do not provide any information that isn't in the documentation links referred to in comments (that are not being removed here). Additionally, all rule config sections are alphabetically ordered for easier scanning etc. PR-URL: #5151 Reviewed-By: Roman Reiss <me@silverwind.io>
MylesBorins
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 18, 2016
The comments make the config hard to scan. They do not provide any information that isn't in the documentation links referred to in comments (that are not being removed here). Additionally, all rule config sections are alphabetically ordered for easier scanning etc. PR-URL: #5151 Reviewed-By: Roman Reiss <me@silverwind.io>
Merged
stefanmb
pushed a commit
to stefanmb/node
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 23, 2016
The comments make the config hard to scan. They do not provide any information that isn't in the documentation links referred to in comments (that are not being removed here). Additionally, all rule config sections are alphabetically ordered for easier scanning etc. PR-URL: nodejs#5151 Reviewed-By: Roman Reiss <me@silverwind.io>
MylesBorins
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 2, 2016
The comments make the config hard to scan. They do not provide any information that isn't in the documentation links referred to in comments (that are not being removed here). Additionally, all rule config sections are alphabetically ordered for easier scanning etc. PR-URL: #5151 Reviewed-By: Roman Reiss <me@silverwind.io>
This was referenced Apr 28, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR is on top of #5135 and should not be landed until that PR lands.
The comments make the config hard to scan. They do not provide any
information that isn't in the documentation links referred to in
comments (that are not being removed here).
Additionally, all rule config sections are alphabetically ordered for
easier scanning etc.
/cc @silverwind