Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

src: fix missing handlescope bug #17539

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

src: fix missing handlescope bug #17539

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

bnoordhuis
Copy link
Member

@bnoordhuis bnoordhuis commented Dec 7, 2017 •
edited
Loading

Fix a regression that was introduced in commit 5886e20 ("inspector:
track async stacks when necessary") and that I overlooked during review:
the persistent handle with the callback must be rematerialized after
the v8::HandleScope is created, not before.

Apparently test/sequential/test-inspector-async-call-stack.js has
no test coverage for this scenario and I'm out of good ideas on how
to create a concise and reliable test case.

Fixes: #17496
CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/11962/

@bnoordhuis
src: fix missing handlescope bug
b466779 
Fix a regression that was introduced in commit 5886e20 ("inspector:
track async stacks when necessary") and that I overlooked during review:
the persistent handle with the callback must be rematerialized *after*
the `v8::HandleScope` is created, not before.

Apparently `test/sequential/test-inspector-async-call-stack.js` has
no test coverage for this scenario and I'm out of good ideas on how
to create a concise and reliable test case.

Fixes: nodejs#17496
@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added c++ Issues and PRs that require attention from people who are familiar with C++. lib / src Issues and PRs related to general changes in the lib or src directory. labels Dec 7, 2017
@bnoordhuis bnoordhuis mentioned this pull request Dec 7, 2017
Closed
addaleax
addaleax approved these changes Dec 7, 2017
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@addaleax addaleax left a comment •
edited
Loading

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

re: testing … maybe just add a SealHandleScope to maxAsyncCallStackDepthChanged() (and other methods that should have one)?

Sorry, I see that’s kind of what already was triggering the assertion in the first place. Not sure how to test it either then.

@bnoordhuis bnoordhuis closed this Dec 9, 2017
bnoordhuis added a commit to bnoordhuis/io.js that referenced this pull request Dec 9, 2017
@bnoordhuis
src: fix missing handlescope bug in inspector
df79b7d 
Fix a regression that was introduced in commit 5886e20 ("inspector:
track async stacks when necessary") and that I overlooked during review:
the persistent handle with the callback must be rematerialized *after*
the `v8::HandleScope` is created, not before.

Apparently `test/sequential/test-inspector-async-call-stack.js` has
no test coverage for this scenario and I'm out of good ideas on how
to create a concise and reliable test case.

Fixes: nodejs#17496
PR-URL: nodejs#17539
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Khaidi Chu <i@2333.moe>
Reviewed-By: Timothy Gu <timothygu99@gmail.com>
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 12, 2017
@bnoordhuis @MylesBorins
src: fix missing handlescope bug in inspector
b3cb627 
Fix a regression that was introduced in commit 5886e20 ("inspector:
track async stacks when necessary") and that I overlooked during review:
the persistent handle with the callback must be rematerialized *after*
the `v8::HandleScope` is created, not before.

Apparently `test/sequential/test-inspector-async-call-stack.js` has
no test coverage for this scenario and I'm out of good ideas on how
to create a concise and reliable test case.

Fixes: #17496
PR-URL: #17539
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Khaidi Chu <i@2333.moe>
Reviewed-By: Timothy Gu <timothygu99@gmail.com>
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 12, 2017
@bnoordhuis @MylesBorins
src: fix missing handlescope bug in inspector
fb3ea4c 
Fix a regression that was introduced in commit 5886e20 ("inspector:
track async stacks when necessary") and that I overlooked during review:
the persistent handle with the callback must be rematerialized *after*
the `v8::HandleScope` is created, not before.

Apparently `test/sequential/test-inspector-async-call-stack.js` has
no test coverage for this scenario and I'm out of good ideas on how
to create a concise and reliable test case.

Fixes: #17496
PR-URL: #17539
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Khaidi Chu <i@2333.moe>
Reviewed-By: Timothy Gu <timothygu99@gmail.com>
@MylesBorins MylesBorins mentioned this pull request Dec 12, 2017
Merged
@gibfahn
Copy link
Member

gibfahn commented Dec 20, 2017

Missing landed in

Landed in df79b7d821

gibfahn pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 20, 2017
@bnoordhuis @gibfahn
src: fix missing handlescope bug in inspector
94d9f20 
Fix a regression that was introduced in commit 5886e20 ("inspector:
track async stacks when necessary") and that I overlooked during review:
the persistent handle with the callback must be rematerialized *after*
the `v8::HandleScope` is created, not before.

Apparently `test/sequential/test-inspector-async-call-stack.js` has
no test coverage for this scenario and I'm out of good ideas on how
to create a concise and reliable test case.

Fixes: #17496
PR-URL: #17539
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Khaidi Chu <i@2333.moe>
Reviewed-By: Timothy Gu <timothygu99@gmail.com>
@gibfahn gibfahn mentioned this pull request Dec 20, 2017
Closed
gibfahn pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 20, 2017
@bnoordhuis @gibfahn
src: fix missing handlescope bug in inspector
28a81ce 
Fix a regression that was introduced in commit 5886e20 ("inspector:
track async stacks when necessary") and that I overlooked during review:
the persistent handle with the callback must be rematerialized *after*
the `v8::HandleScope` is created, not before.

Apparently `test/sequential/test-inspector-async-call-stack.js` has
no test coverage for this scenario and I'm out of good ideas on how
to create a concise and reliable test case.

Fixes: #17496
PR-URL: #17539
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Khaidi Chu <i@2333.moe>
Reviewed-By: Timothy Gu <timothygu99@gmail.com>
@gibfahn gibfahn mentioned this pull request Dec 20, 2017
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@addaleax addaleax addaleax approved these changes

@TimothyGu TimothyGu TimothyGu approved these changes

@cjihrig cjihrig cjihrig approved these changes

@XadillaX XadillaX XadillaX approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
c++ Issues and PRs that require attention from people who are familiar with C++. lib / src Issues and PRs related to general changes in the lib or src directory.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
7 participants
@bnoordhuis @gibfahn @addaleax @TimothyGu @cjihrig @XadillaX @nodejs-github-bot