events: use Reflect.apply #17456
Closed
events: use Reflect.apply #17456
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
apapirovski
added
domain
nodejs-github-bot
added
domain
TimothyGu
approved these changes
Dec 4, 2017
cjihrig
approved these changes
Dec 4, 2017
targos
approved these changes
Dec 4, 2017
lpinca
approved these changes
Dec 5, 2017
jasnell
approved these changes
Dec 5, 2017
BridgeAR
approved these changes
Dec 6, 2017
|
I would say this does not require 48 hours. |
Instead of callback bound apply, instead use the standard Reflect.apply. This is both safer and appears to offer a slight performance benefit.
apapirovski
force-pushed
the
patch-events-reflect-apply
branch
from
73d2844
to
0587724
Compare
|
Missed a spot (+ rebased), have to run the CI again. |
|
Landed in f5eb803 |
apapirovski
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 6, 2017
Instead of callback bound apply, instead use the standard Reflect.apply. This is both safer and appears to offer a slight performance benefit. PR-URL: #17456 Refs: #12956 Reviewed-By: Timothy Gu <timothygu99@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
|
Should this be backported to |
apapirovski
added a commit
to apapirovski/node
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 31, 2018
Instead of callback bound apply, instead use the standard Reflect.apply. This is both safer and appears to offer a slight performance benefit. PR-URL: nodejs#17456 Refs: nodejs#12956 Reviewed-By: Timothy Gu <timothygu99@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
MylesBorins
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 20, 2018
Instead of callback bound apply, instead use the standard Reflect.apply. This is both safer and appears to offer a slight performance benefit. Backport-PR-URL: #18487 PR-URL: #17456 Refs: #12956 Reviewed-By: Timothy Gu <timothygu99@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
|
Setting this as don't land for LTS, please let me know if this should be changed |
Merged
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Instead of callback bound apply, instead use the standard
Reflect.apply. This is both safer and appears to offer a slight performance benefit. Perhaps due to not having to search the prototype tree? No clue tbh but I'm seeing 3-5% difference with substantial significance.Refs: #12956
Checklist
make -j4 test(UNIX), orvcbuild test(Windows) passesAffected core subsystem(s)
domain, events