Update README.md #931
Merged
Update README.md #931
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Line 6: Is this a heading? a link? Line 77: Is there info to be added for the Expected Output? Lines 103 and 131: Should CIF and CAF be PIF and PAF for consistency? Line 105: Can we eliminate the word "probably" because it implies ambiguity?
Beth-Kosis
requested review from
jeanniefinks,
dbogunowicz,
rgreenberg1 and
robertgshaw2-neuralmagic
|
Oh wow, I am a bit embarrassed. |
|
@dbogunowicz may you reply with the URLs to the IC or transformers READMEs in question so we're looking at the ones you are citing, thanks! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Line 6: Is this a heading? a link?
Line 77: Is there info to be added for the Expected Output?
Lines 103 and 131: Should CIF and CAF be PIF and PAF for consistency?
Line 105: Can we eliminate the word "probably" because it implies ambiguity?