A suggestion about specifying a source of secure randomness for better security

[Gax-c]

Hello everyone! I'm new to netty and when I was browsing the code I found the following code in JdkSslServerContext.java here:

            ctx.init(keyManagerFactory.getKeyManagers(),
                    wrapTrustManagerIfNeeded(trustManagerFactory.getTrustManagers()),
                     null);

The code here use a "null", which means using the default securerandom. Although securerandom has already provided enough security, specifying one will ensure better security. For example, using SunJSSE.cryptoProvider for fip mode will be better.

[hyperxpro]

Looks valid. @normanmaurer WDYT?

[normanmaurer]

@hyperxpro @Gax-c I think we could add another constructor that take one ?

[hyperxpro]

Yup. Shall I go ahead with a PR?

[normanmaurer]

@hyperxpro sure

[thxwelchs]

Hi @normanmaurer, @hyperxpro, @Gax-c

I'm interested in this so I created a PR. Could you please review this?

#14058