Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Wallets search pending deadlock #2983

Conversation

guilhermelawless
Copy link
Contributor

@guilhermelawless guilhermelawless commented Sep 25, 2020

Only an issue in develop. Two different paths can deadlock:

  • node::search_pending -> wallets::search_pending_all -> wallets mutex lock -> wallet::search_pending -> node::receive_confirmed -> wallets mutex lock

  • RPC -> wallets::search_pending -> wallets mutex lock -> wallet::search_pending -> node::receive_confirmed -> wallets mutex lock

This fixes the deadlock by unlocking the wallets mutex before calling wallet::search_pending, as there is no need to hold it. But also notes that calling node::receive_confirmed from the wallet is a dependency inversion. There's no need to search for the wallet again and we are sure the block exists, so receive_async can be directly called.

@SergiySW note this means pruning #2881 (I don't think this part has been split yet) will have to consider this new case in wallet::search_pending, not only in node::receive_confirmed.

The added unit test is identical to the existing wallet.search_pending but is now done for wallets

This avoids a dependency inversion as node::receive_confirmed searches all wallets. wallet::search_pending we already know the wallet responsible for receiving that block.
wezrule
wezrule previously approved these changes Sep 25, 2020
@guilhermelawless guilhermelawless merged commit 228522a into nanocurrency:develop Sep 25, 2020
@guilhermelawless guilhermelawless deleted the wallets/search-pending-deadlock branch September 25, 2020 21:20
guilhermelawless pushed a commit to guilhermelawless/nano-node that referenced this pull request Sep 28, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants