Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Introduces GlobalObservationConvention #3285

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 14, 2022

Conversation

marcingrzejszczak
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

* @author Marcin Grzejszczak
* @since 1.10.0
*/
interface GlobalObservationConvention<T extends Context> extends ObservationConvention<T> {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Will this mean that users always need a subtype of GlobalObservationConvention?
Which would mean that they can't use an existing ObservationConvention.

If we want to lock this down/force the users to be explicit about this, I think it's ok, I just wanted to call out this consequence.

@marcingrzejszczak marcingrzejszczak merged commit 42bd029 into main Jul 14, 2022
@jonatan-ivanov jonatan-ivanov deleted the globalObservationConvention branch July 15, 2022 23:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants