Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Snyk] Upgrade impress from 3.0.13 to 3.0.14 #270

Closed

Conversation

tshemsedinov
Copy link
Member

This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.


Snyk has created this PR to upgrade impress from 3.0.13 to 3.0.14.

ℹ️ Keep your dependencies up-to-date. This makes it easier to fix existing vulnerabilities and to more quickly identify and fix newly disclosed vulnerabilities when they affect your project.


  • The recommended version is 1 version ahead of your current version.
  • The recommended version was released 21 days ago, on 2024-02-12.
Release notes
Package name: impress from impress GitHub release notes
Commit messages
Package name: impress
  • 9b72fc4 Version 3.0.14
  • 04ab83b Update CI config
  • ee60796 Use new `Semaphore` intergace
  • 40614e3 Update dependencies
  • e3c8d49 Catch worker error and restart
  • df4c4c4 Refactor procedure timeout
  • 294e8b0 Optimize invoke
  • b8d83ea Optimize timeout for `invoke`
  • a2a7ad0 Fix timers namespace
  • b540c99 Rewrite invoke without ports
  • 1fd89f6 Worker task execution timeout (global)
  • cf552d5 Reimplement global timeouts.request usage
  • fa4d0bb Fix Procedure level queue (#1946)
  • f17652a Fix application stub in Procedure tests
  • 4cabe81 Fix pacckage file formatting
  • 910bde5 Limit supported node.js version to `^18.15`

Compare


Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open upgrade PRs.

For more information:

🧐 View latest project report

🛠 Adjust upgrade PR settings

🔕 Ignore this dependency or unsubscribe from future upgrade PRs

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants