fix: linting issues and rule changes #5681
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@sriramveeraghanta has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 11 minutes and 35 seconds before requesting another review. How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. WalkthroughThe changes primarily involve the removal and modification of ESLint configuration files and TypeScript settings across various packages. Several custom ESLint configurations have been replaced with standardized configurations from Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://github.com/avatars/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 28
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (29)
live/.eslintignore (1)
1-4: LGTM! Good practice for managing linting.The introduction of this
.eslintignorefile is a positive step in managing the project's linting process. By excluding build artifacts, generated files, and static assets, you're ensuring that ESLint focuses on the relevant source code, which can lead to faster linting and clearer results.The ignored directories are appropriate:
.turbo/*: Excludes Turborepo build cacheout/*anddist/*: Excludes common output directories for built/compiled filespublic/*: Excludes static assetsThis setup will help maintain a cleaner and more efficient linting process.
Consider adding comments to explain the purpose of each ignored directory. This can be helpful for new contributors or as a future reference. For example:
+# Turborepo build cache .turbo/* +# Build output directories out/* dist/* +# Static assets public/*packages/typescript-config/react-library.json (1)
7-7: Consider using lowercase for thetargetoptionThe
targetoption has been changed from"es6"to"ES6". While this doesn't affect functionality, it's generally recommended to use lowercase for consistency with other TypeScript configurations.Consider changing it back to lowercase:
- "target": "ES6", + "target": "es6",packages/editor/tsconfig.json (1)
3-8: LGTM with a suggestion for module and target consistency.The new compiler options are well-suited for a React-based editor package. However, there's a potential inconsistency between the
moduleandtargetsettings.Consider aligning the
moduleandtargetsettings for consistency:- "module": "ESNext", + "module": "ES6", "moduleResolution": "Node", "target": "ES6",Alternatively, if you intend to use the latest ECMAScript features:
"module": "ESNext", "moduleResolution": "Node", - "target": "ES6", + "target": "ESNext",Choose the option that best aligns with your project's requirements and supported environments.
live/src/core/helpers/error-handler.ts (1)
Line range hint
4-20: Consider using consistent arrow function syntaxFor consistency with modern TypeScript practices, consider using the concise arrow function syntax when the function body is a single expression.
You could refactor the function to:
export const errorHandler: ErrorRequestHandler = (err, _req, res, _next) => { manualLogger.error(err); res.status(err.status || 500).json({ error: { message: process.env.NODE_ENV === "production" ? "An unexpected error occurred" : err.message, ...(process.env.NODE_ENV !== "production" && { stack: err.stack }), }, }); };This makes the code more concise and easier to read.
packages/eslint-config/package.json (1)
10-20: Standardize dependency versioning and specify eslint versionThe dev dependencies look appropriate for an ESLint configuration package. However, there are some inconsistencies in version specifications:
- Most packages use caret (^) for minor version updates, but
eslintandtypescriptdon't. Consider standardizing this across all dependencies.- The
eslintversion is set to "8", which is quite broad. It's recommended to specify a more precise version to ensure consistency across different environments.Here's a suggested update:
"devDependencies": { "@typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin": "^8.6.0", "@typescript-eslint/parser": "^8.6.0", - "eslint": "8", + "eslint": "^8.56.0", "eslint-config-next": "^14.1.0", "eslint-config-prettier": "^9.1.0", "eslint-config-turbo": "^1.12.4", "eslint-plugin-import": "^2.29.1", "eslint-plugin-react": "^7.33.2", - "typescript": "5.3.3" + "typescript": "^5.3.3" }This change will help maintain consistency and provide more precise control over the package versions.
space/tsconfig.json (1)
Line range hint
3-26: Consider removing duplicate "plugins" configuration.The "plugins" array is defined both at the root level and within "compilerOptions". This duplication might be unnecessary.
Consider removing one of the "plugins" configurations, preferably the one at the root level, as the one in "compilerOptions" is more standard. Here's the suggested change:
{ "extends": "@plane/typescript-config/nextjs.json", - "plugins": [ - { - "name": "next" - } - ], "include": ["next-env.d.ts", "**/*.ts", "**/*.tsx", "additional.d.ts", ".next/types/**/*.ts"], "exclude": ["node_modules"], "compilerOptions": { "baseUrl": ".", "jsx": "preserve", "paths": { "@/*": ["core/*"], "@/helpers/*": ["helpers/*"], "@/public/*": ["public/*"], "@/styles/*": ["styles/*"], "@/plane-web/*": ["ce/*"] }, "plugins": [ { "name": "next" } ], "strictNullChecks": true } }This change will maintain the necessary configuration while reducing redundancy.
package.json (1)
Line range hint
1-35: Summary of changes and potential impactThe changes in this
package.jsonfile have significant implications:
- The workspace configuration has been simplified, which improves maintainability but requires verification.
- The addition of the
"lint:errors"script aligns with the PR objectives.- The removal of several linting-related packages and tools (ESLint, Husky, lint-staged) seems to contradict the PR objectives and may impact code quality processes.
- The formatting script has been slightly modified, which needs verification against project standards.
These changes, while addressing some linting concerns, also introduce potential risks to the project's code quality processes. It's crucial to ensure that linting and code quality checks are still adequately addressed after these changes.
Consider the following recommendations:
- Document the new linting strategy if ESLint is being replaced or removed.
- If removing pre-commit hooks (Husky) and automated linting (lint-staged), ensure there are alternative measures in place to maintain code quality.
- Update the project documentation to reflect these changes in the development workflow.
live/tsconfig.json (1)
11-12: LGTM: Useful path aliases added.The addition of path aliases
@/*and@/plane-live/*can simplify imports and improve code organization. This is a good practice.Consider adding a comment explaining what "ce" stands for in the
@/plane-live/*alias, if it's not obvious to all team members.packages/helpers/hooks/use-outside-click-detector.tsx (1)
Line range hint
1-28: Overall impact: Type safety compromised to fix linting issuesThe changes in this file appear to be attempts to resolve linting issues, but they introduce potential type safety problems. While they might fix immediate linting errors, they compromise on the benefits provided by TypeScript's type system.
Consider the following general approach for improvement:
- Review your linting rules and TypeScript configuration. There might be conflicts or overly strict rules that are causing these issues.
- Instead of using
anyor unsafe type assertions, use more specific types or type guards where possible.- If certain linting rules are causing more harm than good, consider disabling them selectively rather than compromising type safety.
- If you're dealing with truly dynamic types, consider using generics or union types to maintain type safety while allowing flexibility.
Remember, the goal is to leverage TypeScript's type system to catch errors at compile-time, not to bypass it for the sake of satisfying the linter.
admin/package.json (1)
11-12: LGTM! Consider adding afixoption.The updated lint scripts look good and align with the PR objectives. The separation of full linting and error-only linting is a good practice.
Consider adding a
lint:fixscript to automatically fix linting issues where possible:"lint": "eslint . --ext .ts,.tsx", -"lint:errors": "eslint . --ext .ts,.tsx --quiet" +"lint:errors": "eslint . --ext .ts,.tsx --quiet", +"lint:fix": "eslint . --ext .ts,.tsx --fix"packages/ui/src/progress/linear-progress-indicator.tsx (3)
Line range hint
5-8: Consider replacinganywith more specific typesThe
Propstype usesanyfor thedataproperty. It's generally better to avoidanyand use more specific types to improve type safety and code clarity.Consider defining a proper interface for the data structure. For example:
interface DataItem { id: string; name: string; value: number; color: string; } type Props = { data: DataItem[]; noTooltip?: boolean; inPercentage?: boolean; size?: "sm" | "md" | "lg"; };This will provide better type checking and autocompletion throughout the component.
Line range hint
21-22: Remove unused variable and eslint-disable commentThe
progressvariable is declared but never used, and there's an eslint-disable comment to suppress the warning.It's better to remove unused variables to improve code clarity. If you don't need the
progressvariable, you can simply remove these lines:- // eslint-disable-next-line @typescript-eslint/no-unused-vars - let progress = 0;If you do need to calculate the progress, consider using it in the component or removing it if it's not necessary.
Line range hint
44-50: Simplify rendering logic for zero totalThe component renders the same content whether
totalis zero or not. This conditional rendering can be simplified.You can remove the conditional and just render the content once:
return ( <div className={cn("flex w-full items-center justify-between gap-[1px] rounded-sm", { "h-2": size === "sm", "h-3": size === "md", "h-3.5": size === "lg", })} > <div className="flex h-full w-full gap-[1.5px] p-[2px] bg-custom-background-90 rounded-sm">{bars}</div> </div> );This simplifies the code without changing its functionality.
packages/eslint-config/library.js (3)
9-21: LGTM: Improved configuration for React and TypeScriptThe additions of
globals,env, and the updatedsettingssections provide better configuration for React and TypeScript projects. The import resolver setup is correct and uses the previously definedprojectconstant.Consider adding
es2022: true(or the appropriate ECMAScript version) to theenvsection to explicitly define the ECMAScript features available to the linter. This can help prevent false positives for newer language features. For example:env: { node: true, browser: true, + es2022: true, },
48-48: LGTM with suggestion:ignorePatternsadditionThe addition of
ignorePatternsis good for excluding files and directories that don't need linting. However, the pattern.*.jsmight be too broad as it ignores all JavaScript files that start with a dot.Consider refining the
.*.jspattern to be more specific. For example, you might want to ignore only specific dot files:-ignorePatterns: [".*.js", "node_modules/", "dist/"], +ignorePatterns: [".eslintrc.js", ".prettierrc.js", "node_modules/", "dist/"],This change ensures that only specific JavaScript configuration files are ignored, rather than all JavaScript files starting with a dot.
Line range hint
1-49: Overall assessment: Improved ESLint configuration with some concernsThe ESLint configuration has been significantly updated to better accommodate TypeScript and React projects. The changes include:
- Improved project path resolution
- Simplified
extendsarray- Added
globalsandenvsections- Updated
settingsfor TypeScript import resolution- Modified several linting rules
- Added
ignorePatternsWhile these changes generally improve the configuration, there are a few points to consider:
- The removal of Next.js specific configuration might impact Next.js projects if they exist in the repository.
- Some rule severity changes (from error to warning) might lead to decreased code quality over time.
- The broad ignore pattern for
.*.jsfiles might unintentionally ignore important files.To ensure these changes don't negatively impact the project:
- Verify that removing Next.js configuration doesn't affect any existing Next.js projects.
- Consider keeping stricter linting rules or create a plan to gradually enforce them.
- Refine the
ignorePatternsto be more specific.- Add the suggested
es2022: true(or appropriate version) to theenvsection.These refinements will help maintain code quality while providing the flexibility intended by these changes.
admin/core/components/admin-sidebar/root.tsx (1)
12-12: LGTM! Consider addingReact.prefix for consistency.The removal of the
IInstanceSidebarinterface and the simplification of the component signature toFCis a good change. It aligns with the PR objective of fixing linting issues and simplifies the component's type definition.For consistency with other parts of the codebase, consider adding the
React.prefix toFC:-export const InstanceSidebar: FC = observer(() => { +export const InstanceSidebar: React.FC = observer(() => {This change enhances readability and maintains consistency with React type imports across the project.
packages/ui/src/dropdowns/combo-box.tsx (1)
Line range hint
1-78: Overall feedback on changesThe changes in this PR address linting issues and TypeScript errors as indicated in the PR title. While these modifications improve code compliance with linting rules and make TypeScript errors more explicit, they introduce potential type safety concerns.
- The use of
as anytype assertion, while resolving a TypeScript error, bypasses type checking and may mask underlying issues.- The
@ts-expect-errorcomment, although better than@ts-ignore, indicates an unresolved type mismatch that ideally should be addressed at its root cause.These changes appear to be quick fixes for immediate issues. For long-term maintainability and type safety, consider:
- Investigating and resolving the root causes of TypeScript errors where possible.
- Using more specific type assertions or type guards instead of
any.- Documenting any necessary type suppressions with clear explanations.
While these changes meet the immediate goal of fixing linting issues, there's room for improvement in terms of type safety and code robustness.
web/package.json (1)
10-11: Approve linting script changes with a suggestion.The updates to the linting scripts are good improvements:
- The
lintscript now uses ESLint directly, allowing for more customized linting.- The new
lint:errorsscript is useful for focusing on critical issues.These changes align well with the PR objective of addressing linting issues.
Consider adding a
lint:fixscript to automatically fix auto-fixable issues:"scripts": { ... "lint": "eslint . --ext .ts,.tsx", "lint:errors": "eslint . --ext .ts,.tsx --quiet", + "lint:fix": "eslint . --ext .ts,.tsx --fix", ... },packages/ui/src/tooltip/tooltip.tsx (1)
Line range hint
40-40: Address the TODO comment and revisit rendering logicThere's a TODO comment indicating that the tooltip should always render on hover, not by default. This suggests that the current implementation might not be ideal.
Consider the following:
Implement the hover-based rendering as suggested by the TODO comment. This would involve removing the
renderByDefaultprop and always settingshouldRendertotrueon hover.If hover-based rendering is implemented, the
useEffecthook for adding the "mouseenter" event listener might become unnecessary, simplifying the component.Ensure that the component's behavior is consistent across different devices, including mobile (where hover might not be applicable).
Please review and update the rendering logic to address these concerns. This will improve the component's behavior and remove the need for the temporary fix.
packages/eslint-config/next.js (1)
14-22: LGTM: Plugins and settings are well-configuredThe plugins, import resolver settings, and ignore patterns are appropriately set up for a React TypeScript project.
Consider adding '.eslintrc.js' to the ignore patterns if you have a separate ESLint configuration file:
- ignorePatterns: [".*.js", "node_modules/"], + ignorePatterns: [".*.js", "node_modules/", ".eslintrc.js"],This ensures that the ESLint configuration file itself is not linted, which can sometimes cause circular dependencies.
web/core/components/analytics/custom-analytics/select-bar.tsx (1)
3-10: Improved import organization, minor suggestion for consistency.The reorganization of imports with clear comment headers improves code readability and maintainability. Great job on grouping related imports together!
For even better consistency, consider ordering the import groups as follows:
- External libraries
- Types
- UI components
- Other components
- Constants
- Hooks
This order follows a common pattern of moving from external to internal dependencies.
packages/editor/src/core/types/editor.ts (3)
69-69: LGTM! Consider adjusting naming convention.The change from an interface to a type alias simplifies the definition while maintaining the same functionality. This aligns well with the PR objective of addressing linting issues and rule changes.
Consider renaming
ILiteTextEditortoTLiteTextEditorto follow the common TypeScript convention of prefixing type aliases with 'T' instead of 'I'. However, if your team's style guide prefers consistency with existing naming patterns in the codebase over general TypeScript conventions, you can disregard this suggestion.
100-100: LGTM! Consider adjusting naming convention.The change from an interface to a type alias simplifies the definition while maintaining the same functionality. This aligns well with the PR objective of addressing linting issues and rule changes.
Consider renaming
ILiteTextReadOnlyEditortoTLiteTextReadOnlyEditorto follow the common TypeScript convention of prefixing type aliases with 'T' instead of 'I'. However, if your team's style guide prefers consistency with existing naming patterns in the codebase over general TypeScript conventions, you can disregard this suggestion.
102-102: LGTM! Consider adjusting naming convention.The change from an interface to a type alias simplifies the definition while maintaining the same functionality. This aligns well with the PR objective of addressing linting issues and rule changes.
Consider renaming
IRichTextReadOnlyEditortoTRichTextReadOnlyEditorto follow the common TypeScript convention of prefixing type aliases with 'T' instead of 'I'. However, if your team's style guide prefers consistency with existing naming patterns in the codebase over general TypeScript conventions, you can disregard this suggestion.packages/editor/src/core/hooks/use-read-only-editor.ts (1)
115-115: Simplified getHeadings methodThe simplification of
getHeadingsto a single-line return statement improves code conciseness while maintaining the same functionality. This change aligns well with the PR objectives of addressing linting issues and rule changes.For consistency with the
getDocumentInfomethod, consider using parentheses:- getHeadings: () => editorRef?.current?.storage.headingList.headings, + getHeadings: () => (editorRef?.current?.storage.headingList.headings),This change would make both methods visually consistent and explicitly show the return value as an object or array.
live/src/core/extensions/index.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-149: Summary of changes and recommendationsThis review identified two main areas for improvement:
Refactoring of async Promise executors: The changes at lines 48-49 and 87-88 introduce TODO comments and eslint-disable directives to address linting issues. However, these are temporary solutions. It's recommended to refactor these sections to avoid using async executors in Promise constructors, as suggested in the previous comments.
Code style consistency: Minor formatting changes were made to remove trailing commas, improving overall code consistency.
To further improve the code:
- Implement the suggested refactoring for both instances of async Promise executors.
- Conduct a broader review of the codebase to identify and refactor similar patterns.
- Consider updating your linting rules or running a linter automatically to catch these issues earlier in the development process.
These changes will enhance code quality, maintainability, and adherence to best practices in asynchronous JavaScript/TypeScript programming.
packages/ui/src/badge/helper.tsx (1)
Line range hint
113-124: Update functions if enums are refactored to objectsIf you implement the suggested refactors for
badgeSizeStylingandbadgeIconStyling, remember to update thegetBadgeStylingandgetIconStylingfunctions accordingly.Here are the suggested updates:
export const getBadgeStyling = (variant: TBadgeVariant, size: TBadgeSizes, disabled: boolean = false): string => { let tempVariant: string = ``; const currentVariant = badgeStyling[variant]; tempVariant = `${currentVariant.default} ${disabled ? currentVariant.disabled : currentVariant.hover}`; const tempSize = size ? Object.values(badgeSizeStyling[size]).join(' ') : ''; return `${tempVariant} ${tempSize}`; }; export const getIconStyling = (size: TBadgeSizes): string => { return size ? badgeIconStyling[size] : ''; };These changes assume the implementation of the object-based
badgeSizeStylingandbadgeIconStylingas suggested in the previous comments.packages/editor/src/core/hooks/use-editor.ts (1)
264-268: LGTM: Improved getDocumentInfo implementation with a minor suggestionThe
getDocumentInfomethod has been refactored to use an implicit return with an object literal, which enhances code readability. The use of optional chaining (?.) ensures safe access to potentially undefined properties. This change aligns well with modern JavaScript practices and the PR's objective.Consider using nullish coalescing (
??) instead of logical OR (||) for the fallback values. This would handle cases where the value might be 0 (which is falsy but a valid count) more accurately:getDocumentInfo: () => ({ characters: editorRef?.current?.storage?.characterCount?.characters?.() ?? 0, paragraphs: getParagraphCount(editorRef?.current?.state) ?? 0, words: editorRef?.current?.storage?.characterCount?.words?.() ?? 0, })
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
yarn.lockis excluded by!**/yarn.lock,!**/*.lock
Files selected for processing (72)
- .eslintrc-staged.js (0 hunks)
- .eslintrc.js (0 hunks)
- .lintstagedrc.json (0 hunks)
- admin/.eslintrc.js (1 hunks)
- admin/core/components/admin-sidebar/root.tsx (1 hunks)
- admin/core/components/instance/instance-failure-view.tsx (1 hunks)
- admin/core/services/auth.service.ts (1 hunks)
- admin/core/services/user.service.ts (1 hunks)
- admin/package.json (2 hunks)
- admin/tsconfig.json (1 hunks)
- live/.eslintignore (1 hunks)
- live/.eslintrc.json (1 hunks)
- live/package.json (2 hunks)
- live/src/ce/types/common.d.ts (1 hunks)
- live/src/core/extensions/index.ts (4 hunks)
- live/src/core/helpers/error-handler.ts (1 hunks)
- live/tsconfig.json (1 hunks)
- package.json (1 hunks)
- packages/editor/.eslintrc.js (1 hunks)
- packages/editor/package.json (2 hunks)
- packages/editor/src/core/components/menus/ai-menu.tsx (0 hunks)
- packages/editor/src/core/components/menus/block-menu.tsx (0 hunks)
- packages/editor/src/core/extensions/code/lowlight-plugin.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/editor/src/core/extensions/mentions/mention-node-view.tsx (1 hunks)
- packages/editor/src/core/extensions/table/table/table-view.tsx (1 hunks)
- packages/editor/src/core/extensions/table/table/table.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/editor/src/core/hooks/use-editor.ts (3 hunks)
- packages/editor/src/core/hooks/use-read-only-editor.ts (2 hunks)
- packages/editor/src/core/types/editor.ts (2 hunks)
- packages/editor/tsconfig.json (1 hunks)
- packages/eslint-config-custom/package.json (0 hunks)
- packages/eslint-config/library.js (2 hunks)
- packages/eslint-config/next.js (1 hunks)
- packages/eslint-config/package.json (1 hunks)
- packages/eslint-config/server.js (1 hunks)
- packages/helpers/hooks/use-outside-click-detector.tsx (1 hunks)
- packages/helpers/tsconfig.json (1 hunks)
- packages/typescript-config/base.json (1 hunks)
- packages/typescript-config/nextjs.json (2 hunks)
- packages/typescript-config/package.json (1 hunks)
- packages/typescript-config/react-library.json (1 hunks)
- packages/ui/.eslintrc.js (1 hunks)
- packages/ui/package.json (2 hunks)
- packages/ui/src/badge/helper.tsx (1 hunks)
- packages/ui/src/button/helper.tsx (1 hunks)
- packages/ui/src/dropdown/multi-select.tsx (0 hunks)
- packages/ui/src/dropdown/single-select.tsx (0 hunks)
- packages/ui/src/dropdowns/combo-box.tsx (2 hunks)
- packages/ui/src/emoji/emoji-icon-picker.tsx (2 hunks)
- packages/ui/src/progress/linear-progress-indicator.tsx (1 hunks)
- packages/ui/src/tooltip/tooltip.tsx (1 hunks)
- packages/ui/tsconfig.json (1 hunks)
- space/.eslintrc.js (1 hunks)
- space/core/components/editor/lite-text-read-only-editor.tsx (1 hunks)
- space/core/components/editor/rich-text-read-only-editor.tsx (1 hunks)
- space/package.json (2 hunks)
- space/tsconfig.json (1 hunks)
- web/.eslintrc.js (1 hunks)
- web/app/[workspaceSlug]/(projects)/sidebar.tsx (1 hunks)
- web/core/components/analytics/custom-analytics/select-bar.tsx (1 hunks)
- web/core/components/editor/lite-text-editor/lite-text-read-only-editor.tsx (1 hunks)
- web/core/components/editor/rich-text-editor/rich-text-read-only-editor.tsx (1 hunks)
- web/core/components/issues/issue-detail/label/root.tsx (1 hunks)
- web/core/components/issues/issue-layouts/kanban/roots/cycle-root.tsx (0 hunks)
- web/core/components/issues/issue-layouts/kanban/roots/draft-issue-root.tsx (0 hunks)
- web/core/components/issues/issue-layouts/kanban/roots/module-root.tsx (0 hunks)
- web/core/components/issues/issue-layouts/list/block-root.tsx (1 hunks)
- web/core/components/issues/issue-layouts/list/roots/cycle-root.tsx (0 hunks)
- web/core/components/issues/issue-layouts/list/roots/module-root.tsx (0 hunks)
- web/core/components/project/form-loader.tsx (1 hunks)
- web/package.json (2 hunks)
- web/tsconfig.json (1 hunks)
Files not reviewed due to no reviewable changes (13)
- .eslintrc-staged.js
- .eslintrc.js
- .lintstagedrc.json
- packages/editor/src/core/components/menus/ai-menu.tsx
- packages/editor/src/core/components/menus/block-menu.tsx
- packages/eslint-config-custom/package.json
- packages/ui/src/dropdown/multi-select.tsx
- packages/ui/src/dropdown/single-select.tsx
- web/core/components/issues/issue-layouts/kanban/roots/cycle-root.tsx
- web/core/components/issues/issue-layouts/kanban/roots/draft-issue-root.tsx
- web/core/components/issues/issue-layouts/kanban/roots/module-root.tsx
- web/core/components/issues/issue-layouts/list/roots/cycle-root.tsx
- web/core/components/issues/issue-layouts/list/roots/module-root.tsx
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (9)
- admin/core/services/auth.service.ts
- packages/editor/src/core/extensions/mentions/mention-node-view.tsx
- packages/editor/src/core/extensions/table/table/table-view.tsx
- packages/ui/src/button/helper.tsx
- space/core/components/editor/lite-text-read-only-editor.tsx
- space/core/components/editor/rich-text-read-only-editor.tsx
- web/core/components/editor/lite-text-editor/lite-text-read-only-editor.tsx
- web/core/components/editor/rich-text-editor/rich-text-read-only-editor.tsx
- web/core/components/issues/issue-layouts/list/block-root.tsx
Additional context used
Biome
live/src/ce/types/common.d.ts
[error] 1-1: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
Additional comments not posted (97)
packages/typescript-config/package.json (1)
2-2: Package name updated to use @plane scopeThe package name has been changed from "tsconfig" to "@plane/typescript-config". This change aligns the package with the @plane organization scope, which is good for better organization and reducing potential naming conflicts.
However, please ensure that all references to this package in other parts of the project are updated accordingly. This change might affect:
- Import statements in TypeScript/JavaScript files
- References in other package.json files (e.g., in dependencies or devDependencies)
- Build scripts or configuration files that might reference this package
To verify that all references to this package have been updated, you can run the following script:
If the script returns any results, those locations may need to be updated to use the new package name.
admin/.eslintrc.js (4)
1-8: Summary of ESLint configuration changesThe ESLint configuration has been significantly simplified:
- Adopted a standardized configuration (
@plane/eslint-config/next.js).- Removed custom
settingsandrulessections.- Added
parserOptionswithproject: truefor enhanced TypeScript support.These changes align with the PR objective of fixing linting issues and changing rules. While simplification can ease maintenance, it's crucial to verify that all necessary linting rules are still in place and functioning as expected.
To ensure the new configuration maintains the desired code quality standards, please:
- Run a full lint check on the project.
- Review a sample of files to confirm import ordering and resolution work correctly.
- Monitor build times to assess any performance impact from the
parserOptionschange.
8-8: Verify the impact of removedsettingsandrulessections.The removal of the
settingsandrulessections simplifies the configuration. However, it's crucial to ensure that the new standardized configuration (@plane/eslint-config/next.js) includes equivalent or suitable replacements for these removed settings and rules, especially for import resolution and ordering.Please run the following commands to check if the import resolution and ordering are still working as expected:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify import resolution and ordering after configuration change. # Test 1: Check for any unresolved imports echo "Checking for unresolved imports:" rg --type typescript --type javascript "import.*from" | rg -v "from '[\.@]" || echo "No potentially unresolved imports found." # Test 2: Check the order of imports in a few files echo "Checking import order in a sample file:" fd -e ts -e tsx -e js -e jsx | head -n 1 | xargs cat # Note: Review the output manually to ensure imports are ordered correctly
5-7: Approve the addition ofparserOptions.The addition of
parserOptionswithproject: trueis beneficial for TypeScript projects. It enables TypeScript-specific linting rules that require type information, leading to more accurate and powerful linting.Monitor the linting performance after this change, as it may increase linting time due to type checking. Run the following command to check the linting time:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check linting time after configuration change. # Test: Time the ESLint run time npx eslint . --ext .js,.jsx,.ts,.tsx
3-3: Approve the standardized ESLint configuration.The shift to a standardized ESLint configuration (
@plane/eslint-config/next.js) is a good practice. It can help maintain consistency across projects and reduce the need for custom rules.Please verify that this new configuration meets all the project's linting requirements. Run the following command to check for any new linting issues:
live/.eslintrc.json (4)
2-2: LGTM: Correct root configurationSetting
"root": trueis the correct approach for the main ESLint configuration file. This prevents ESLint from searching for other configuration files in parent directories, ensuring that only this configuration is used for the project.
1-8: Overall, the ESLint configuration looks goodThis ESLint configuration file is well-structured and appropriate for a TypeScript project. It extends from a custom configuration, uses the correct parser for TypeScript, and enables TypeScript project-aware linting.
Key points:
- Root configuration is correctly set.
- Extends from a custom configuration (verify its existence).
- Uses the TypeScript parser (verify its installation).
- Enables project-aware linting (consider specifying the tsconfig.json path for optimization).
These changes should improve the linting process for your TypeScript code.
4-4: LGTM: Correct parser for TypeScriptUsing
"@typescript-eslint/parser"is the correct choice for linting TypeScript files. This parser allows ESLint to understand TypeScript syntax.Let's verify that the parser package is installed:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the installation of @typescript-eslint/parser # Test: Check if @typescript-eslint/parser is listed in package.json if grep -q "@typescript-eslint/parser" package.json; then echo "@typescript-eslint/parser is listed in package.json" else echo "@typescript-eslint/parser is not listed in package.json. Please ensure it's installed correctly." fi
3-3: Verify the extended configuration fileExtending from
"@plane/eslint-config/server.js"is a good practice for maintaining consistent linting rules across the project. However, we should verify that this configuration file exists and is accessible.Let's verify the existence and content of the extended configuration:
packages/editor/.eslintrc.js (3)
3-3: Approve the transition to a standardized ESLint configThe change from a custom ESLint configuration to
"@plane/eslint-config/library.js"is a good move towards standardization. This can help maintain consistency across different parts of the project.To ensure the new configuration is correctly set up, please run the following command:
#!/bin/bash # Verify the existence and content of the new ESLint config if [ -f "node_modules/@plane/eslint-config/library.js" ]; then echo "Config file exists. Content:" cat "node_modules/@plane/eslint-config/library.js" else echo "Config file not found. Please check the package installation." fi
8-8: Verify that all necessary rules are included in the extended configurationThe removal of all custom rules from the
rulesobject suggests that the project is now relying entirely on the rules defined in"@plane/eslint-config/library.js". While this can help maintain consistency, it's important to ensure that all necessary rules are included in the extended configuration.To verify the rules included in the extended configuration, please run the following command:
#!/bin/bash # Check the rules in the extended configuration if [ -f "node_modules/@plane/eslint-config/library.js" ]; then echo "Rules in @plane/eslint-config/library.js:" grep -n "rules" -A 50 "node_modules/@plane/eslint-config/library.js" else echo "@plane/eslint-config/library.js not found. Please check the package installation." fi
5-7: Approve the addition of parserOptionsThe addition of
parserOptionswithproject: trueis a good configuration for TypeScript projects. This allows the parser to consider the TypeScript project configuration for more accurate linting.To ensure the TypeScript project is correctly set up, please run the following command:
#!/bin/bash # Verify TypeScript project setup if [ -f "tsconfig.json" ]; then echo "tsconfig.json exists. Checking for 'include' and 'exclude' properties:" grep -E "include|exclude" tsconfig.json else echo "tsconfig.json not found. Please check the TypeScript project setup." fipackages/eslint-config/server.js (1)
7-10: LGTM: Parser options are well-configured.The
parserOptionssection is correctly configured for a modern Node.js environment. UsingecmaVersion: "latest"allows for the latest ECMAScript features, andsourceType: "module"is appropriate for code using ES modules.packages/helpers/tsconfig.json (2)
2-2: Verify the new TypeScript configuration extensionThe TypeScript configuration has been changed to extend from
"@plane/typescript-config/react-library.json". This change might introduce different compiler options or rules that could affect the entire project.Please confirm:
- Is this change intentional and part of a larger update to standardize TypeScript configurations across the project?
- Have all necessary dependencies been updated to support this new configuration?
- Has this change been tested to ensure it doesn't introduce any unexpected behavior or break existing functionality?
To verify the impact, you can run the following script:
This will help us understand if this change is consistent across the project.
Verification successful
TypeScript Configuration Extension Verified
All
tsconfig.jsonfiles consistently extend from@plane/typescript-configvariants, ensuring standardized and modular TypeScript configurations across the project.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for other tsconfig files and their extensions echo "Checking for other tsconfig.json files:" fd tsconfig.json echo "\nChecking the content of found tsconfig.json files:" fd tsconfig.json -x catLength of output: 3485
4-5: Approve addition of "lib" compiler option with verificationThe addition of
"lib": ["esnext", "dom"]to the compiler options is a good change. It allows for the use of the latest ECMAScript features and provides DOM types, which is beneficial for a React library.To ensure this change doesn't introduce any issues, please:
- Verify that all developers are using a TypeScript version that supports these lib options.
- Check if this change affects the build output or introduces any warnings/errors in the existing codebase.
- Confirm that the project's target environments (browsers, Node.js versions) support the features enabled by "esnext".
You can run the following script to check for any new TypeScript errors:
This will help identify any potential issues introduced by this change.
packages/ui/tsconfig.json (3)
4-5: Addition of 'lib' property to compiler optionsThe
libproperty has been added tocompilerOptionswith values["esnext", "dom"]. This explicitly specifies the library files to be included in the compilation, which can help resolve linting issues related to missing type definitions.The inclusion of both "esnext" and "dom" is appropriate for a React library, as it provides access to the latest ECMAScript features and DOM types.
Line range hint
1-9: Overall TypeScript configuration update looks goodThe changes made to this
tsconfig.jsonfile are appropriate and align well with the PR objectives of fixing linting issues and updating rules. The updated configuration provides a more specific base configuration for a React library and explicitly defines the required library files for compilation.These changes should help improve code consistency and reduce potential linting issues in the UI package.
2-2: Update to TypeScript configuration inheritanceThe
extendsproperty has been updated to use a more specific configuration:"@plane/typescript-config/react-library.json". This change aligns with the PR objective of addressing linting issues and rule changes.To ensure consistency across the project, let's verify if similar changes have been made in other
tsconfig.jsonfiles:Verification successful
Consistent TypeScript Configuration Verified
The
extendsproperty inpackages/ui/tsconfig.jsoncorrectly aligns with similar configurations in the codebase, ensuring consistency and adherence to project standards.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for consistent TypeScript configuration across the project # Test: Search for tsconfig.json files and their 'extends' property fd tsconfig.json --exec grep -H '"extends":'Length of output: 522
web/.eslintrc.js (4)
1-9: Summary of ESLint configuration changesThe ESLint configuration has been significantly simplified:
- It now extends a predefined configuration (
@plane/eslint-config/next.js).- Custom
settingsandruleshave been removed.parserOptionswithproject: truehas been added.These changes align with the PR objective of fixing linting issues and changing rules. They should promote consistency and reduce maintenance overhead. However, please ensure:
- All necessary project-specific linting rules are still enforced.
- The new configuration doesn't introduce any unexpected behavior.
- Linting performance remains acceptable with the new
parserOptions.Overall, this change appears to be a step in the right direction for maintaining code quality and consistency.
6-8: Approve the addition of parserOptions with a performance noteThe addition of
parserOptionswithproject: trueis beneficial as it allows for more advanced linting rules that require type information.However, this may increase linting time. Please monitor the linting performance, especially in large projects or CI/CD pipelines. You can use the following command to measure the linting time:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Measure ESLint execution time time npx eslint .If you notice significant slowdowns, consider using ESLint's caching mechanism or exploring other optimization strategies.
4-4: Verify that critical rules and settings are not lostThe removal of the
settingsandrulessections suggests that the new predefined configuration might already include these. However, it's crucial to ensure that no critical project-specific rules or settings have been lost in this transition.Please review the contents of the "@plane/eslint-config/next.js" configuration to confirm it includes all necessary rules, especially those related to import ordering and organization. You can use the following command to inspect the configuration:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Inspect the contents of the new ESLint configuration npx eslint --print-config .eslintrc.jsCompare the output with your previous configuration to ensure all critical rules are still in place.
4-4: Approve the use of predefined ESLint configurationThe change to use "@plane/eslint-config/next.js" is a good practice. It can help maintain consistency and reduce the need for custom rules.
Please verify that this new configuration meets all the project's linting requirements. You can run the following command to check for any new linting issues:
space/.eslintrc.js (4)
Line range hint
1-11: Summary of ESLint configuration changesThe changes to
.eslintrc.jsrepresent a significant shift towards a more standardized and simplified ESLint configuration:
- Adoption of a predefined configuration (
@plane/eslint-config/next.js)- Addition of
parserOptionswithproject: truefor enhanced TypeScript linting- Removal of custom rules
These changes should lead to more consistent and maintainable linting across your project(s). However, please ensure that:
- The new configuration meets all your project's linting requirements
- There's no significant performance impact from enabling
project: true- No critical project-specific rules have been unintentionally removed
Consider documenting the rationale behind this configuration change for future reference.
9-9: Review the removal of custom ESLint rulesThe
rulessection has been cleared, which aligns with the adoption of the standardized@plane/eslint-config/next.jsconfiguration. This simplifies the ESLint setup and promotes consistency.However, it's important to ensure that no critical project-specific rules have been unintentionally removed. Please run the following verification script to compare the current ESLint configuration with the previous one:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Compare current ESLint rules with the previous configuration # Test: Compare ESLint configurations echo "Current ESLint configuration:" npx eslint --print-config . | jq .rules echo "Please compare these rules with your previous .eslintrc.js file to ensure no critical project-specific rules have been unintentionally removed." echo "If any important custom rules are missing, consider adding them back to the 'rules' section of .eslintrc.js."
6-8: Approve the addition ofparserOptionswithproject: trueAdding
parserOptionswithproject: trueis a good enhancement for TypeScript projects. This enables TypeScript-specific linting rules that require type information, providing more accurate and powerful linting.However, this change may impact linting performance. To monitor its effect, please run the following verification script:
4-4: Approve the switch to a standardized ESLint configurationThe change to use
@plane/eslint-config/next.jsis a good move towards standardization. This predefined configuration will likely ensure consistent linting rules across your Next.js projects.To ensure the new configuration is properly set up, please run the following verification script:
packages/typescript-config/react-library.json (2)
8-8: LGTM: Repositioning of thejsxoptionThe repositioning of the
jsxoption within thecompilerOptionsblock is fine. It doesn't affect functionality and might improve the organization of the configuration file.
10-10: Verify ifexcludeis necessaryAdding
"exclude": ["node_modules"]is a good practice to improve compilation performance. However, this might be redundant if it's already specified in the base configuration file that this config extends from.Please check the
base.jsonfile to ensure this exclusion isn't already present. If it's not, then this addition is beneficial. You can use the following script to check the base configuration:#!/bin/bash # Description: Check if node_modules is already excluded in base.json # Test: Look for exclude field in base.json rg --json '"exclude"' packages/typescript-config/base.json | jq '.data.lines.text'If the script doesn't return any results, then this addition is necessary and beneficial.
packages/ui/.eslintrc.js (6)
1-1: LGTM: Proper type annotation for ESLint configurationThe JSDoc type annotation is correctly used to specify the type of the exported configuration object. This enhances type checking and provides better IDE support.
2-10: LGTM: Correct module exports syntaxThe use of
module.exportsis appropriate for an ESLint configuration file. The configuration object is properly structured.
3-3: LGTM: Correct root configurationSetting
root: trueis correct. This prevents ESLint from searching for configuration files in parent directories, which is important in a monorepo structure to ensure that the UI package has its own isolated ESLint configuration.
5-5: LGTM: Correct parser for TypeScriptThe use of "@typescript-eslint/parser" is correct for a TypeScript project. This allows ESLint to properly understand and lint TypeScript syntax.
6-9: LGTM: Correct parser options, but verify tsconfig.jsonThe parser options are correctly specified for a TypeScript project. The use of a relative path for tsconfig.json and setting tsconfigRootDir to __dirname is appropriate. However, it's important to verify the existence of the tsconfig.json file.
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the existence of tsconfig.json in the UI package # Test: Check if tsconfig.json exists in the same directory as .eslintrc.js if [ -f "$(dirname "$0")/tsconfig.json" ]; then echo "tsconfig.json found in the UI package directory." else echo "Warning: tsconfig.json not found in the UI package directory." fi
4-4: LGTM: Configuration extension, but verify the base configExtending a base configuration is a good practice for maintaining consistency. However, please verify that "@plane/eslint-config/library.js" is the correct configuration to extend for this UI package.
admin/tsconfig.json (4)
4-11: LGTM! Verify TypeScript compilation with the new plugin.The addition of the Next.js plugin (
{ "name": "next" }) is a good improvement. It should provide better integration with Next.js-specific features and optimizations.To ensure these changes don't affect the project negatively:
- Verify that the TypeScript compilation process works as expected, especially for JSX files.
- Check that module imports using the defined paths still resolve correctly.
Run the following script to verify the TypeScript compilation:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify TypeScript compilation # Expected result: No TypeScript errors echo "Running TypeScript compilation check..." # Note: Adjust the TypeScript compilation command based on your project setup npx tsc --noEmit echo "\nChecking for JSX files:" fd -e tsx echo "\nVerifying module imports for defined paths:" rg -t typescript -n "from ['\"]@/"
1-15: Summary: Improved TypeScript configuration for Next.js integrationThe changes to
tsconfig.jsonappear to be well-considered improvements:
- Adoption of a custom TypeScript configuration (
@plane/typescript-config/nextjs.json).- Addition of the Next.js plugin for better integration.
- Inclusion of
next.config.jsfor type-checking.These changes should enhance the development experience and catch potential issues earlier in the development process. However, it's important to verify that these changes don't introduce any unexpected behavior or compilation errors.
To ensure a smooth transition with these configuration changes:
- Run a full TypeScript compilation of the project.
- Perform a test build of the Next.js application.
- Review any new TypeScript errors or warnings that may appear in the IDE.
Here's a script to perform these verifications:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify project compilation and build # Expected result: Successful TypeScript compilation and Next.js build echo "Running TypeScript compilation..." npx tsc --noEmit echo "\nPerforming Next.js build..." npx next build echo "\nChecking for TypeScript errors in source files:" rg -t typescript -n "error TS\d+:"
2-2: LGTM! Verify the impact of the new TypeScript configuration.The change to use
"@plane/typescript-config/nextjs.json"looks good. This custom configuration likely provides preset options tailored for Next.js projects within the Plane ecosystem.To ensure this change doesn't introduce unexpected behavior, please verify:
- The project builds successfully with the new configuration.
- There are no new TypeScript errors or warnings introduced.
- The IDE's TypeScript integration works as expected with the new configuration.
Run the following script to check for any TypeScript configuration files that might need updating:
13-14: LGTM! Verify type-checking for next.config.js.Including
"next.config.js"in theincludearray is a good practice. It allows TypeScript to type-check the Next.js configuration file, which can help catch potential errors early in the development process.To ensure this change is effective:
- Verify that
next.config.jsexists in the project root.- Check that TypeScript is able to process
next.config.jswithout errors.Run the following script to verify the Next.js configuration file:
web/tsconfig.json (2)
15-16: Approve the relocation of include and exclude properties.The
includeandexcludeproperties have been moved to the end of the configuration file. This change doesn't affect functionality and might improve readability.
12-14: Approve the simplification of compiler options.The changes in the
compilerOptionssection, particularly the simplification of thepluginsarray and the removal ofjsxandesModuleInteropoptions, appear to streamline the configuration. This aligns with the PR objective of addressing linting issues and rule changes.To ensure the removed options don't cause any issues, please run the following verification script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the impact of removed compiler options # Test: Check if jsx and esModuleInterop are set in the extended configuration echo "Checking extended configuration for jsx and esModuleInterop options..." grep -E "jsx|esModuleInterop" node_modules/@plane/typescript-config/nextjs.json # Test: Verify if any files rely on the removed options echo "Checking for potential issues due to removed options..." rg --type typescript -e "import \* as" -e "export \* from" -e "import React" -l # If any files are found, they might need to be updated to account for the removed esModuleInterop optionpackages/editor/tsconfig.json (3)
17-18: LGTM: Appropriate include and exclude configurations.The
includeandexcludearrays are well-configured for a typical TypeScript project structure.
1-19: Overall LGTM with a note on removedextendsproperty.The changes to the
tsconfig.jsonfile generally improve the TypeScript configuration for the editor package. However, there's one important consideration:The AI summary mentions that the
extendsproperty, which previously referencedtsconfig/react-library.json, has been removed. This change isn't visible in the provided diff but could have significant implications. Please verify that:
- All necessary compiler options from the previously extended configuration have been explicitly added to this file.
- The removal of the
extendsproperty doesn't unintentionally diverge from project-wide TypeScript standards.You can run the following script to compare the current configuration with the previously extended one:
This will help ensure that no critical configurations have been inadvertently omitted.
9-15: LGTM with a note onallowSyntheticDefaultImports.The
pathsconfiguration remains appropriate, and the addition ofallowSyntheticDefaultImportscan improve compatibility with certain modules.Note that while
allowSyntheticDefaultImports: truecan be convenient, it may mask issues with modules that don't have proper default exports. Ensure that this setting aligns with your project's needs and coding standards.To verify the impact of this change, you can run the following script:
This script will help identify any imports that might be relying on this compiler option.
packages/typescript-config/base.json (1)
12-13: Approved: Module resolution updated to NodeNextThe changes to
moduleandmoduleResolutionproperties to "NodeNext" align with modern TypeScript and Node.js practices. This update enables better compatibility with the latest Node.js ECMAScript module support.To ensure this change doesn't introduce unexpected issues, please verify:
- The project builds successfully with these new settings.
- All import/export statements in the codebase are compatible with the new module resolution strategy.
- Any third-party libraries used in the project are compatible with this configuration.
You can run the following script to check for potential issues with import/export statements:
This script will help identify import and export statements that might need to be updated to work with the new module resolution strategy.
packages/eslint-config/package.json (3)
1-4: LGTM: Package metadata looks goodThe package metadata is well-structured:
- The scoped package name "@plane/eslint-config" is appropriate for a custom ESLint configuration.
- Marking the package as private is a good practice to prevent accidental publishing.
- The version number follows semantic versioning.
1-21: Overall, the new ESLint config package looks good and aligns with PR objectivesThis new
@plane/eslint-configpackage is well-structured and aligns with the PR objective of addressing linting issues and rule changes. It provides a centralized location for ESLint configurations, which can help maintain consistency across different parts of the project.Key points:
- The package metadata is correctly set up.
- Different configurations for library, Next.js, and server environments are provided.
- Appropriate dev dependencies are included for ESLint and related plugins.
The suggested improvements (verifying file existence, adding a README.md, and standardizing dependency versions) will further enhance the package's usability and maintainability.
5-9: Verify the existence of listed files and consider adding README.mdThe "files" section lists three JavaScript files: library.js, next.js, and server.js. These likely represent different ESLint configurations for various environments.
Please run the following script to check if these files exist in the package directory:
Consider adding a README.md file to the package and including it in the "files" section. This would provide useful information about the ESLint configurations and how to use them.
"files": [ "library.js", "next.js", "server.js" + "README.md" ],Verification successful
Verified the existence of listed files and recommend adding README.md
All listed files (
library.js,next.js,server.js) exist in thepackages/eslint-configdirectory.Consider adding a
README.mdfile to the package and including it in the "files" section. This will provide useful information about the ESLint configurations and usage instructions.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check if the listed files exist in the package directory cd packages/eslint-config for file in library.js next.js server.js; do if [ ! -f "$file" ]; then echo "Warning: $file does not exist in the package directory" fi doneLength of output: 236
space/tsconfig.json (1)
2-2: ```shell
#!/bin/bashDescription: Display the contents of space/tsconfig.json
cat space/tsconfig.json
```shell #!/bin/bash # Description: Check if @plane/typescript-config/nextjs.json exists and display its contents fd "@plane/typescript-config/nextjs.json" --hidden#!/bin/bash # Description: If the extended config exists, display its contents if fd "@plane/typescript-config/nextjs.json" --hidden | grep -q "@plane/typescript-config/nextjs.json"; then cat path/to/@plane/typescript-config/nextjs.json else echo "Extended TypeScript configuration '@plane/typescript-config/nextjs.json' not found." fipackages/typescript-config/nextjs.json (3)
6-6: Excellent addition of the Next.js TypeScript plugin!The inclusion of the "next" plugin in the TypeScript configuration is a valuable improvement. This plugin enhances the development experience by providing:
- Improved type checking for Next.js-specific APIs
- Better autocompletion for Next.js features
- Catch potential errors related to Next.js usage at compile-time
This change aligns with best practices for Next.js projects using TypeScript.
16-16: Approved: Consistent capitalization formoduleoptionThe update from "esnext" to "ESNext" for the
modulecompiler option is a good change. While functionally equivalent, this modification:
- Aligns with the official TypeScript documentation's capitalization
- Improves consistency in the configuration file
- May help prevent potential issues with case-sensitive systems or tools
This change contributes to better maintainability and adherence to TypeScript conventions.
Line range hint
1-24: Summary: Excellent TypeScript configuration updates for Next.jsThese changes collectively enhance the TypeScript configuration for Next.js projects:
- Addition of the Next.js TypeScript plugin improves type checking and autocompletion.
- Update to
module: "ESNext"maintains consistency with TypeScript documentation.- Introduction of
moduleResolution: "Bundler"leverages modern TypeScript features for better bundling support.These modifications align well with the PR objectives of fixing linting issues and updating rules. They should lead to improved development experience, better type safety, and potentially better build performance for Next.js projects using this configuration.
package.json (4)
18-18: Approve addition oflint:errorsscript.The addition of the
"lint:errors"script aligns well with the PR objective of addressing linting issues. This will allow for more focused linting, specifically targeting errors.
20-20: Verify impact offormatscript modification.The
"format"script has been modified to use double quotes instead of single quotes. While this change is minor, it's important to ensure it doesn't conflict with any existing formatting rules or preferences in the project.Please run the following command to check if this change aligns with the project's prettier configuration:
#!/bin/bash # Check if the .prettierrc file exists and contains relevant configuration if [ -f ".prettierrc" ]; then echo "Prettier configuration:" cat .prettierrc | grep -E "singleQuote|quoteProps" else echo ".prettierrc file not found. Please verify if this change aligns with the project's formatting standards." fi
23-27: Verify impact of removed linting-related packages.Several linting-related packages have been removed from the
devDependencies, including"eslint-config-custom"and"eslint-plugin-prettier". This seems to contradict the PR objective of addressing linting issues.Please clarify the reasoning behind removing these packages and how linting will be handled moving forward. Run the following command to check for any remaining ESLint configuration:
#!/bin/bash # Check for ESLint configuration files echo "Searching for ESLint configuration files:" fd -e js -e json -e yaml -e yml --max-depth 1 --glob '*eslint*' # Check if ESLint is still installed in any workspace echo "Checking for ESLint in workspaces:" fd --glob 'package.json' --exec grep -l '"eslint"' {} \;Additionally, the removal of
"husky"and"lint-staged"might affect pre-commit hooks and automated linting. Please ensure that these changes don't negatively impact the project's code quality processes.
11-11: Approve workspace simplification with a verification step.The simplification of the
workspacesarray to use a wildcard entry"packages/*"improves maintainability and scalability. This change aligns well with the PR objective of addressing linting issues and rule changes.To ensure this change doesn't unintentionally include any packages, please run the following command and verify the output:
live/tsconfig.json (5)
6-6: LGTM: Improved readability.The simplification of the
libproperty to a single line improves readability without changing functionality.
24-24: LGTM: Including tsup config in TypeScript processing.Adding
"tsup.config.ts"to theincludearray allows TypeScript to process this configuration file. This can help catch errors in the build configuration early, which is a good practice.
1-26: Overall, the changes improve the TypeScript configuration.The modifications to
tsconfig.jsonalign well with the PR objective of fixing linting issues and changing rules. The new configuration extends a more specific base, adjusts the project structure, adds useful path aliases, and includes the build tool config in TypeScript processing. These changes should lead to better code organization and earlier error detection.Please ensure to run the suggested verification scripts to confirm that these changes don't introduce any unexpected issues.
8-8: Verify the implications of broadening the root directory.Changing
rootDirto"."allows TypeScript to process files outside thesrcdirectory. While this aligns with including"tsup.config.ts", ensure this broader scope is intentional and doesn't lead to unexpected behavior.Run the following script to check for any unexpected TypeScript files being processed:
Verification successful
Approve the root directory change.
The
rootDirhas been successfully broadened to".", and all TypeScript files are within expected directories. No unintended files are being processed, ensuring the change won't lead to unexpected behavior.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: List all TypeScript files that will be processed by the compiler # Test: Find all .ts files in the project directory, excluding node_modules and dist fd -e ts -E node_modules -E distLength of output: 40292
2-2: Verify the impact of the new TypeScript configuration.The change to
"@plane/typescript-config/base.json"is likely an improvement, as it seems to be a more specific configuration for the Plane project. This change aligns with the PR objective of addressing linting issues and rule changes.To ensure this change doesn't introduce unexpected issues, please run the following script:
admin/core/services/user.service.ts (1)
3-4: LGTM: Import path updated to use aliasThe change from a relative import path to an alias path (
@/helpers/common.helper) is a good practice. It makes imports more consistent across the project and easier to manage, especially when refactoring or moving files.admin/package.json (2)
49-50: Clarify the TypeScript version downgrade.The addition of
@plane/typescript-configis a good move towards standardization.However, the TypeScript version has been downgraded from 5.4.5 to 5.3.3.
Could you please clarify the reason for this downgrade? Is it due to compatibility issues with other dependencies or to align with a specific version used across the organization?
Let's verify the TypeScript version used in other parts of the project:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check TypeScript versions across the project # Test 1: Find all package.json files and grep for typescript version echo "TypeScript versions in package.json files:" fd package.json --type f --exec grep -H '"typescript":' {} + # Test 2: Check if there's a global TypeScript version specified echo "Checking for global TypeScript version:" rg --type yaml --type json '"typescript":' ./*.json
47-47: Verify the new eslint config integration.The switch to
@plane/eslint-configis a good move towards standardization.Let's verify that the new eslint config is properly integrated:
Verification successful
ESLint Config Integration Verified Successfully.
All ESLint configurations now extend
@plane/eslint-config, and there are no remaining references toeslint-config-custom.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the integration of @plane/eslint-config # Test 1: Check if @plane/eslint-config is referenced in the eslint config file echo "Checking eslint config file for @plane/eslint-config:" rg --type yaml --type json "@plane/eslint-config" .eslintrc* # Test 2: Verify that there are no lingering references to the old eslint-config-custom echo "Checking for any remaining references to eslint-config-custom:" rg --type yaml --type json --type typescript --type javascript "eslint-config-custom"Length of output: 1349
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the integration of @plane/eslint-config and absence of eslint-config-custom # Test 1: Check if @plane/eslint-config is referenced in ESLint configuration files echo "Checking ESLint config files for @plane/eslint-config:" rg --type yaml --type json "@plane/eslint-config" .eslintrc.* # Test 2: Ensure there are no references to eslint-config-custom in any relevant files echo "Checking for any remaining references to eslint-config-custom:" rg --type yaml --type json --type typescript --type javascript "eslint-config-custom"Length of output: 490
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the integration of @plane/eslint-config and absence of eslint-config-custom # Test 1: Check if @plane/eslint-config is referenced in ESLint configuration files echo "Checking ESLint config files for @plane/eslint-config:" rg "@plane/eslint-config" --glob "*.eslintrc.js" --glob "*.eslintrc.json" --glob "*.eslintrc.yaml" --glob "*.eslintrc.yml" # Test 2: Ensure there are no references to eslint-config-custom in any relevant files echo "Checking for any remaining references to eslint-config-custom:" rg "eslint-config-custom" --glob "*.eslintrc.js" --glob "*.eslintrc.json" --glob "*.eslintrc.yaml" --glob "*.eslintrc.yml" --type js --type json --type yamlLength of output: 942
admin/core/components/instance/instance-failure-view.tsx (1)
10-10: LGTM! Verify usage in other components.The removal of props from the
InstanceFailureViewcomponent signature is consistent with its implementation, as it doesn't use any props internally. This change simplifies the component's interface.To ensure this change doesn't break existing usage, please run the following script to check for any occurrences where props are passed to this component:
If the script returns any results, those occurrences need to be updated to remove the props.
Verification successful
[/run_scripts]
Verified: No occurrences of
InstanceFailureViewwith props found.The removal of props from the
InstanceFailureViewcomponent is safe and does not affect other parts of the codebase.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for usage of InstanceFailureView component with props # Search for InstanceFailureView usage with any attributes rg --type typescript --type typescriptreact '<InstanceFailureView\s+[^>/]*>' -g '!admin/core/components/instance/instance-failure-view.tsx'Length of output: 176
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for usage of InstanceFailureView component with props # Search for InstanceFailureView usage with any attributes in .ts and .tsx files, excluding the component's own file rg '<InstanceFailureView\s+[^>/]*>' -g '*.ts' -g '*.tsx' -g '!admin/core/components/instance/instance-failure-view.tsx'Length of output: 121
packages/ui/src/progress/linear-progress-indicator.tsx (1)
30-30: LGTM! Good addition of thekeyprop.Adding the
keyprop to thedivelement whennoTooltipis true is a great improvement. This change aligns with React's best practices for list rendering and will enhance the component's performance during updates.Using
item.idas the key is a good choice, assuming thatidis unique for each item in thedataarray. This will help React efficiently identify which items have changed, been added, or been removed in the list of progress bar segments.packages/eslint-config/library.js (1)
1-3: LGTM: Proper setup for project path resolutionThe use of
node:pathand theresolvefunction to set up the project path is a good practice. This ensures that thetsconfig.jsonfile is correctly located relative to the current working directory.live/package.json (2)
11-12: LGTM: Addition of lint scriptsThe addition of
lintandlint:errorsscripts is a good practice for maintaining code quality. These scripts will help catch potential issues in TypeScript and React TypeScript files.
Line range hint
1-62: Please clarify how changes align with PR objectivesThe PR title mentions "fix: linting issues and rule changes". While the addition of lint scripts clearly addresses the linting aspect, it's not immediately clear how the TypeScript downgrade relates to the PR objectives.
Could you please provide more context on:
- The specific linting issues that were addressed?
- The rule changes mentioned in the PR title and how they relate to the TypeScript downgrade?
This information will help ensure that all changes are in line with the intended objectives of this PR.
space/package.json (3)
10-11: Improved linting scriptsThe changes to the linting scripts are beneficial:
- The
lintscript now specifically targets TypeScript files (.tsand.tsx), which is more appropriate for a TypeScript project.- The new
lint:errorsscript runs ESLint in quiet mode, which is useful for CI/CD pipelines or when you want to focus only on errors.These updates align well with the PR objective of addressing linting issues.
62-62: Adoption of custom configurationsThe changes to use
@plane/eslint-configand@plane/typescript-configare good improvements:
- They suggest a move towards standardized configurations across projects.
- This can lead to more consistent code style and TypeScript settings across your codebase.
These changes align well with the PR objective of addressing linting issues and improving overall code quality.
Also applies to: 64-64
65-65: Verify the TypeScript version downgradeThe TypeScript version has been downgraded from 5.4.5 to 5.3.3. This is unexpected and could potentially cause compatibility issues or lose access to newer TypeScript features.
Could you please clarify the reason for this downgrade? If it's intentional, consider adding a comment in the PR description explaining the rationale.
To verify the impact, you can run the following script:
web/core/components/project/form-loader.tsx (2)
Line range hint
8-62: Implementation looks goodThe component's implementation is well-structured and appropriate for a loading placeholder. It uses a combination of nested divs and Loader components to create a skeleton UI, which is a good practice for improving perceived performance.
The use of Tailwind classes for styling is consistent and provides a responsive layout. The component doesn't rely on props or state, which aligns with its purpose as a static loading indicator.
7-7: Verify the impact of removing props from ProjectDetailsFormLoaderThe removal of the
IProjectDetailsFormLoaderinterface simplifies the component's signature. This change suggests that the component doesn't require any props to function, which is consistent with its implementation.To ensure this change doesn't break existing usage, please run the following script:
If the script returns any results, it indicates that there might be places in the codebase where
ProjectDetailsFormLoaderis being used with props. In that case, those usages need to be updated to remove the props.packages/ui/package.json (4)
20-21: LGTM: New scripts for linting and CSS processingThe addition of the
lintandpostcssscripts enhances the project's development workflow:
- The
lintscript allows for easy linting of TypeScript and TSX files.- The
postcssscript enables processing of CSS files, which is beneficial for maintaining styles.These additions align well with the PR's objective of addressing linting issues and improving the overall code quality.
61-61: LGTM: Replaced custom configs with @plane namespace configsThe removal of
eslint-config-customandtsconfigin favor of@plane/eslint-configand@plane/typescript-configis a positive change:
- It suggests a move towards more standardized configurations within the @plane namespace.
- This can lead to better consistency across different parts of the project.
- The change aligns well with the PR's objective of addressing linting issues and rule changes.
This refactoring should make it easier to maintain and update linting and TypeScript configurations across the project.
Also applies to: 68-68
Line range hint
1-72: Summary: Excellent improvements to linting, configuration, and development workflowOverall, the changes to this
package.jsonfile are well-structured and align perfectly with the PR's objectives:
- Addition of lint and postcss scripts enhances the development workflow.
- Migration to @plane namespace for ESLint and TypeScript configurations promotes standardization.
- Updated dependencies reflect the project's evolving needs.
These changes should lead to:
- Improved code quality through consistent linting.
- Easier maintenance of configurations across the project.
- Enhanced CSS processing capabilities.
The only point requiring attention is the TypeScript version downgrade, which should be verified as per the previous comment.
Great job on these improvements!
61-61: LGTM: Updated dev dependencies, but verify TypeScript versionThe changes to the dev dependencies look good:
- Addition of
@plane/eslint-configand@plane/typescript-configsuggests a move towards centralized configuration, which can improve consistency across the project.- These changes align with the PR's objective of addressing linting issues and rule changes.
However, there's one point that requires attention:
- The TypeScript version has been downgraded from 5.4.5 to 5.3.3. While this might be intentional, it's worth verifying if this downgrade is necessary and won't cause any compatibility issues with other dependencies or TypeScript features used in the project.
To ensure the TypeScript version change doesn't introduce any issues, please run the following script:
This script will help identify any potential compatibility issues with the TypeScript version downgrade.
Also applies to: 68-68, 70-70
packages/editor/package.json (4)
29-29: LGTM: Addition of lint scriptThe addition of a lint script is a good practice for maintaining code quality. The script correctly targets TypeScript files in the src directory.
81-81: Verify the new TypeScript configurationThe change from "tsconfig" to "@plane/typescript-config" is noted. This suggests a move to a more standardized TypeScript configuration within the Plane project.
Please ensure that this change is consistent across the project and that the new TypeScript configuration meets the project's requirements. Run the following script to check for any other occurrences of the old configuration:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining occurrences of the old TypeScript configuration # Test: Search for "tsconfig" in all package.json files rg --type json '"tsconfig"' -g 'package.json'
83-83: Clarify the TypeScript version downgradeThe TypeScript version has been downgraded from 5.4.5 to 5.3.3. This is an unusual change that might have implications on the project.
Could you please provide the rationale for this downgrade? Are there any specific compatibility issues or requirements that necessitated this change?
Also, please run the following script to check if this downgrade is consistent across the project:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for TypeScript version inconsistencies # Test: Search for TypeScript version declarations in all package.json files rg --type json '"typescript": "' -g 'package.json'This will help ensure that all parts of the project are using the same TypeScript version.
78-78: Verify the new eslint configurationThe change from "eslint-config-custom" to "@plane/eslint-config" is noted. This suggests a move to a more standardized eslint configuration within the Plane project.
Please ensure that this change is consistent across the project and that the new eslint configuration meets the project's linting requirements. Run the following script to check for any other occurrences of the old configuration:
Verification successful
Eslint Configuration Successfully Updated
All instances of
"eslint-config-custom"have been removed from the project'spackage.jsonfiles and replaced with"@plane/eslint-config". The eslint configuration update is consistent across the entire project and meets the project's linting requirements.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining occurrences of the old eslint configuration # Test: Search for "eslint-config-custom" in all package.json files rg --type json '"eslint-config-custom"' -g 'package.json'Length of output: 139
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining occurrences of the old eslint configuration # Test: Search for "eslint-config-custom" in all package.json files rg --type json '"eslint-config-custom"' -g 'package.json'Length of output: 57
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining occurrences of "eslint-config-custom" in dependencies and devDependencies of all package.json files # Find all package.json files and check for "eslint-config-custom" in dependencies or devDependencies fd 'package.json' . -x sh -c ' echo "Checking $1" jq -e \'(.dependencies | has("eslint-config-custom")) or (.devDependencies | has("eslint-config-custom"))\' "$1" >/dev/null if [ $? -eq 0 ]; then echo "Found \"eslint-config-custom\" in $1" fi ' sh {}Length of output: 262
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining occurrences of "eslint-config-custom" in dependencies and devDependencies of all package.json files # Find all package.json files and check for "eslint-config-custom" in dependencies or devDependencies fd 'package.json' . -x sh -c " echo \"Checking \$1\" jq -e '(.dependencies | has(\"eslint-config-custom\")) or (.devDependencies | has(\"eslint-config-custom\"))' \"\$1\" >/dev/null if [ \$? -eq 0 ]; then echo \"Found \\\"eslint-config-custom\\\" in \$1\" fi " sh {}Length of output: 796
web/package.json (2)
84-84: Request clarification on TypeScript version downgrade.The TypeScript version has been downgraded from 5.4.5 to 5.3.3. This is an unusual change that doesn't seem to align directly with the PR objectives of fixing linting issues and changing rules.
Could you please provide the rationale for this downgrade? There might be potential impacts:
- Loss of newer TypeScript features or improvements.
- Possible compatibility issues with other dependencies.
To help assess the impact, please run the following script:
This script will help identify any usage of TypeScript 5.4-specific features and check for any new type errors introduced by the downgrade.
80-80: Approve ESLint config change with verification suggestion.The switch from
eslint-config-customto@plane/eslint-configis a good move towards using a shared, project-specific ESLint configuration. This change aligns with the PR objective of updating linting rules and can help maintain consistency across the project.To ensure this change is reflected in the ESLint configuration, please run the following script:
This script will help verify that the new ESLint configuration is properly referenced in the project's ESLint setup.
Verification successful
ESLint configuration successfully updated and old config removed.
All instances now use@plane/eslint-config, andeslint-config-customhas been fully removed from the codebase.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the ESLint configuration is using @plane/eslint-config # Test: Search for @plane/eslint-config in ESLint configuration files rg --type json --type yaml '@plane/eslint-config' .eslintrc*Length of output: 331
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the ESLint configuration is using @plane/eslint-config # Test: Search for @plane/eslint-config in ESLint configuration files rg --type json --type yaml --type js '"@plane/eslint-config"' .eslintrc.*Length of output: 129
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for @plane/eslint-config in package.json and other potential ESLint configuration files # Search in package.json rg '"@plane/eslint-config"' package.json # Search in other ESLint configuration files, if any exist rg '"@plane/eslint-config"' .Length of output: 430
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Ensure that eslint-config-custom has been completely removed from the codebase # Search for any occurrences of "eslint-config-custom" in package.json and ESLint configuration files rg '"eslint-config-custom"' package.json .eslintrc.* eslintConfigLength of output: 174
packages/eslint-config/next.js (2)
1-13: LGTM: Initial setup and configuration look goodThe initial setup and configuration are well-structured and appropriate for a Next.js TypeScript project. Good practices are followed, such as using 'node:path' for Node.js built-in modules and extending relevant configurations.
34-40: React rules look good, clarification needed on Next.js rulesThe React-specific rules are well-configured and promote good practices. Setting 'react-hooks/exhaustive-deps' to 'warn' is a good balance between catching issues and not being too restrictive.
Could you provide the rationale for turning off the Next.js specific rules '@next/next/no-html-link-for-pages' and '@next/next/no-img-element'? These rules are typically recommended for Next.js projects. If there's a specific reason for disabling them, it would be helpful to add comments explaining why. Otherwise, consider enabling them:
- "@next/next/no-html-link-for-pages": "off", - "@next/next/no-img-element": "off", + "@next/next/no-html-link-for-pages": "error", + "@next/next/no-img-element": "error",To verify the impact of these rules, you can run the following commands:
#!/bin/bash # Search for <a> tags with href attributes rg --type typescript --type javascript '<a\s+[^>]*href\s*=\s*["\'][^"\']*["\']' # Search for <img> tags rg --type typescript --type javascript '<img\s+[^>]*>'This will help identify any instances where these rules might flag issues, allowing you to make an informed decision about whether to keep them disabled or not.
web/app/[workspaceSlug]/(projects)/sidebar.tsx (1)
24-24: LGTM! Verify component usage after prop type removal.The removal of the
IAppSidebarinterface and the simplification of the component signature look good. This change suggests that the component no longer expects any props, which can simplify its usage.To ensure this change doesn't break any existing usage of the component, please run the following script:
If the script returns any results, it means there are places in the codebase where
AppSidebaris still being used with props, which may need to be updated.web/core/components/analytics/custom-analytics/select-bar.tsx (1)
Line range hint
14-93: Component functionality remains intact.I've verified that the changes in the import section do not affect the functionality or structure of the
CustomAnalyticsSelectBarcomponent. All necessary imports are still available and correctly used within the component.packages/editor/src/core/types/editor.ts (1)
Line range hint
69-102: Verify the impact of interface to type alias changes.The changes from interfaces to type aliases for
ILiteTextEditor,ILiteTextReadOnlyEditor, andIRichTextReadOnlyEditorimprove code simplicity and maintainability. However, it's important to ensure that these changes don't have unintended consequences in the broader codebase.Please run the following script to check for any potential issues:
This script will help identify any potential issues that might arise from changing these interfaces to type aliases. Please review any results carefully to ensure compatibility with the changes.
Verification successful
Verified: No issues found with the interface to type alias changes.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for potential issues related to the interface to type alias changes # Test 1: Check for any 'implements' clauses using these types echo "Checking for 'implements' clauses:" rg --type typescript "implements\s+(ILiteTextEditor|ILiteTextReadOnlyEditor|IRichTextReadOnlyEditor)" # Test 2: Check for any type assertions or 'instanceof' checks echo "Checking for type assertions or 'instanceof' checks:" rg --type typescript "(as\s+(ILiteTextEditor|ILiteTextReadOnlyEditor|IRichTextReadOnlyEditor)|instanceof\s+(ILiteTextEditor|ILiteTextReadOnlyEditor|IRichTextReadOnlyEditor))" # Test 3: Check for any usage of these types with indexed access echo "Checking for indexed access on these types:" rg --type typescript "(ILiteTextEditor|ILiteTextReadOnlyEditor|IRichTextReadOnlyEditor)\[.+\]" echo "If any of the above checks return results, please review those occurrences to ensure compatibility with the type alias changes."Length of output: 1050
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for potential issues related to the interface to type alias changes without using --type # Test 1: Check for any 'implements' clauses using these types echo "Checking for 'implements' clauses in .ts and .tsx files:" rg "implements\s+(ILiteTextEditor|ILiteTextReadOnlyEditor|IRichTextReadOnlyEditor)" --glob "*.ts" --glob "*.tsx" # Test 2: Check for any type assertions or 'instanceof' checks echo "Checking for type assertions or 'instanceof' checks in .ts and .tsx files:" rg "(as\s+(ILiteTextEditor|ILiteTextReadOnlyEditor|IRichTextReadOnlyEditor)|instanceof\s+(ILiteTextEditor|ILiteTextReadOnlyEditor|IRichTextReadOnlyEditor))" --glob "*.ts" --glob "*.tsx" # Test 3: Check for any usage of these types with indexed access echo "Checking for indexed access on these types in .ts and .tsx files:" rg "(ILiteTextEditor|ILiteTextReadOnlyEditor|IRichTextReadOnlyEditor)\[.+\]" --glob "*.ts" --glob "*.tsx" echo "If any of the above checks return results, please review those occurrences to ensure compatibility with the type alias changes."Length of output: 1110
packages/editor/src/core/hooks/use-read-only-editor.ts (2)
98-102: Improved code concisenessThe refactoring of
getDocumentInfoto a single-line arrow function improves code readability while maintaining the same functionality. The use of optional chaining and nullish coalescing operators is preserved, which is excellent for handling potential undefined values.
Line range hint
1-130: Overall assessment: Successful code style improvementsThe changes in this file successfully address the PR objectives of fixing linting issues and implementing rule changes. The refactoring of
getDocumentInfoandgetHeadingsmethods improves code conciseness and readability without altering functionality. These modifications contribute to a more consistent and maintainable codebase.No security issues or performance concerns were introduced, and the core functionality remains intact. Great job on improving the code quality!
live/src/core/extensions/index.ts (1)
57-57: Approve minor formatting changesThe removal of trailing commas in function calls and log messages at lines 57, 127, 141, and 146 improves code consistency and likely aligns with the project's coding standards.
These changes are purely stylistic and don't affect the functionality of the code. They contribute to a more uniform code style across the project.
Also applies to: 127-127, 141-141, 146-146
packages/ui/src/emoji/emoji-icon-picker.tsx (2)
105-105: LGTM: Improved closing mechanismThe change from
close()tohandleToggle(false)is a good improvement. It provides more flexibility and consistency with the component's API, allowing the parent component to have more control over the closing behavior.
124-124: LGTM: Consistent improvement in closing mechanismThis change mirrors the improvement made in the emoji selection, applying the same
handleToggle(false)approach to icon selection. This ensures consistent behavior across both emoji and icon selections, which is excellent for maintaining a predictable user experience.packages/editor/src/core/extensions/table/table/table.ts (1)
247-247: Consider using a more specific type instead ofanyWhile using
anyas a type assertion may resolve immediate TypeScript errors, it reduces type safety and goes against TypeScript best practices. This change might lead to potential runtime errors if incompatible decoration types are passed, and it reduces TypeScript's ability to catch type-related errors at compile-time.Consider the following alternatives:
Use the correct specific type for
decorationsif known. This maintains type safety and helps catch errors early.If the exact type is unknown or complex, consider using
unknowninstead ofany. This still requires explicit type checking or assertion before use, providing a safer alternative toany.If
decorationscan be of multiple specific types, use a union type instead ofany.Example:
return new TableView(node, cellMinWidth, decorations as DecorationSet | undefined, editor, getPos as () => number);Replace
DecorationSetwith the actual type or union of types thatdecorationscan be.To help determine the correct type for
decorations, you can run the following script to find its usage and type information:This will help identify the expected type for the
decorationsparameter inTableView.packages/editor/src/core/hooks/use-editor.ts (3)
85-85: LGTM: Simplified mentionHighlights assignmentThe direct assignment of
mentionHandler.highlightstomentionHighlightsimproves code clarity by removing unnecessary default value assignment. This change aligns well with the PR's objective of addressing linting issues and rule changes.
173-173: LGTM: Concise getHeadings implementationThe
getHeadingsmethod has been refactored to use a more concise arrow function syntax. This change enhances code readability while maintaining the same functionality. It's in line with modern JavaScript best practices and the PR's goal of addressing linting issues.
Line range hint
1-285: Overall assessment: Improvements in code quality and readabilityThe changes in this file successfully address the PR objectives of fixing linting issues and implementing rule changes. The modifications enhance code readability, maintainability, and align with modern JavaScript best practices. No major issues were identified, and the functionality appears to be preserved.
Great job on these improvements!
| "parserOptions": { | ||
| "project": true | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider specifying the tsconfig.json path
Setting "project": true in parserOptions is correct and allows the parser to use TypeScript's project configuration. This is necessary for TypeScript-specific rules that require type information.
However, for larger projects, this can significantly slow down linting. For better performance, consider explicitly specifying the path to your tsconfig.json file.
You could optimize this by changing the configuration to:
"parserOptions": {
"project": "./tsconfig.json"
}Replace "./tsconfig.json" with the actual path to your TypeScript configuration file if it's located elsewhere.
| }, | ||
| ], | ||
| extends: ["@plane/eslint-config/library.js"], | ||
| parser: "@typescript-eslint/parser", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Tip
Codebase Verification
Missing @plane/eslint-config Dependency
The @plane/eslint-config package is not listed in your package.json and is not installed in node_modules. This is required for the ESLint configuration to function correctly.
- Add
@plane/eslint-configto yourpackage.jsondependencies. - Run
npm installto install the necessary packages.
Analysis chain
Approve the addition of TypeScript parser
The addition of "@typescript-eslint/parser" as the parser is a good step towards supporting TypeScript in the project. This will allow ESLint to understand and lint TypeScript syntax.
To ensure the TypeScript setup is correct, please run the following command:
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Verify TypeScript configuration
if [ -f "tsconfig.json" ]; then
echo "tsconfig.json exists. Content:"
cat tsconfig.json
else
echo "tsconfig.json not found. Please check the TypeScript setup."
fi
# Check for TypeScript dependencies
npm ls typescript @typescript-eslint/parser @typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin
Length of output: 230
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if @plane/eslint-config is listed in package.json
if grep -q '"@plane/eslint-config"' package.json; then
echo "@plane/eslint-config is listed in package.json."
else
echo "@plane/eslint-config is not listed in package.json. Please add it as a dependency."
fi
# Verify if @plane/eslint-config is installed in node_modules
if [ -d "node_modules/@plane/eslint-config" ]; then
echo "@plane/eslint-config is installed."
# Check if library.js exists within @plane/eslint-config
if [ -f "node_modules/@plane/eslint-config/library.js" ]; then
echo "library.js exists within @plane/eslint-config."
else
echo "library.js does not exist within @plane/eslint-config."
fi
else
echo "@plane/eslint-config is not installed. Please run 'npm install'."
fi
Length of output: 414
| module.exports = { | ||
| extends: ["eslint:recommended"], | ||
| env: { | ||
| node: true, | ||
| es6: true, | ||
| }, | ||
| parserOptions: { | ||
| ecmaVersion: "latest", | ||
| sourceType: "module", | ||
| }, | ||
| }; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider enhancing the configuration with additional rules and plugins.
While this configuration provides a good foundation, there are opportunities to enhance it further:
- Add more specific rules tailored to your project's coding standards.
- Consider using additional plugins for more comprehensive linting.
- If applicable, integrate with a code formatter like Prettier.
Here's an example of how you might enhance the configuration:
module.exports = {
extends: [
"eslint:recommended",
"plugin:node/recommended",
"plugin:prettier/recommended"
],
env: {
node: true,
es2022: true,
},
parserOptions: {
ecmaVersion: "latest",
sourceType: "module",
},
rules: {
// Add any custom rules here
"no-unused-vars": ["error", { "argsIgnorePattern": "^_" }],
"no-console": ["warn", { allow: ["warn", "error"] }],
},
};This example adds the node and prettier plugins, and includes some custom rules. Adjust according to your project's needs.
| env: { | ||
| node: true, | ||
| es6: true, | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Update environment settings for clarity and consistency.
The current env settings are correct, but they can be improved for clarity and consistency with modern ECMAScript versions.
Consider updating the env section as follows:
env: {
node: true,
- es6: true,
+ es2022: true, // or the latest ECMAScript version you're targeting
},This change aligns better with the ecmaVersion: "latest" setting in parserOptions and explicitly states which ECMAScript features are available in the environment.
Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| env: { | |
| node: true, | |
| es6: true, | |
| }, | |
| env: { | |
| node: true, | |
| es2022: true, // or the latest ECMAScript version you're targeting | |
| }, |
| module.exports = { | ||
| extends: ["eslint:recommended"], |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider extending from additional Node.js-specific presets.
While using "eslint:recommended" is a good start, for a server-side configuration, you might want to consider extending from additional presets specific to Node.js environments. This can help catch more Node.js-specific issues and enforce best practices.
Consider adding the following to the extends array:
module.exports = {
- extends: ["eslint:recommended"],
+ extends: [
+ "eslint:recommended",
+ "plugin:node/recommended"
+ ],
// ... rest of the configuration
};Note: You'll need to install the eslint-plugin-node package if you haven't already.
Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| module.exports = { | |
| extends: ["eslint:recommended"], | |
| module.exports = { | |
| extends: [ | |
| "eslint:recommended", | |
| "plugin:node/recommended" | |
| ], |
| // TODO: Fix this lint error. | ||
| // eslint-disable-next-line no-async-promise-executor |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Refactor to address the linting issue properly
The added TODO comment and eslint-disable directive indicate a known linting issue with the use of an async executor in a Promise constructor. While the eslint-disable comment temporarily suppresses the error, it's better to refactor the code to address the underlying issue.
Consider refactoring the code to avoid using an async executor in the Promise constructor. Here's a suggested approach:
return Promise.resolve().then(async () => {
try {
let fetchedData = null;
if (documentType === "project_page") {
fetchedData = await fetchPageDescriptionBinary(
params,
pageId,
cookie
);
} else {
fetchedData = await fetchDocument({
cookie,
documentType,
pageId,
params,
});
}
return fetchedData;
} catch (error) {
manualLogger.error("Error in fetching document", error);
throw error; // Re-throw the error to be consistent with Promise rejection
}
});This refactoring wraps the async logic in a Promise.resolve().then() chain, which is a more idiomatic way to handle asynchronous operations in Promises. It also properly propagates errors by re-throwing them, ensuring that the Promise is rejected if an error occurs.
| // TODO: Fix this lint error. | ||
| // eslint-disable-next-line no-async-promise-executor |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Tip
Codebase Verification
Refactor multiple async Promise executors and review similar patterns
Two instances of async Promise executors were found in live/src/core/extensions/index.ts:
-
return new Promise(async (resolve) => {
-
return new Promise(async () => {
Both instances use async functions within Promise constructors, which violates the no-async-promise-executor ESLint rule. Refactor these to eliminate the use of async executors and ensure proper error handling.
Analysis chain
Refactor to address the linting issue and review similar patterns
Similar to the previous instance, this code segment uses an async executor in a Promise constructor, which is flagged by the linter. The added TODO comment and eslint-disable directive are temporary solutions that should be replaced with a proper refactor.
- Refactor this code segment similarly to the previous suggestion:
return Promise.resolve().then(async () => {
try {
if (documentType === "project_page") {
await updatePageDescription(params, pageId, state, cookie);
} else {
await updateDocument({
cookie,
documentType,
pageId,
params,
updatedDescription: state,
});
}
} catch (error) {
manualLogger.error("Error in updating document:", error);
throw error; // Re-throw the error to be consistent with Promise rejection
}
});- Conduct a broader review of the codebase for similar patterns. This recurring issue suggests that there might be other instances of this anti-pattern that need addressing.
To help identify other instances of this pattern in the codebase, you can run the following command:
This will help locate other occurrences of this pattern that may need refactoring.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for async Promise executors in TypeScript files
rg --type typescript 'new Promise\(async' -C 3
Length of output: 83
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for async Promise executors in TypeScript files
rg --type ts 'new Promise\(async' -C 3
Length of output: 1076
| // eslint-disable-next-line @typescript-eslint/ban-ts-comment | ||
| // @ts-ignore | ||
| step.from !== undefined && | ||
| // eslint-disable-next-line @typescript-eslint/ban-ts-comment | ||
| // @ts-ignore | ||
| step.to !== undefined && | ||
| oldNodes.some( | ||
| (node) => | ||
| // eslint-disable-next-line @typescript-eslint/ban-ts-comment | ||
| // @ts-ignore | ||
| node.pos >= step.from && | ||
| // eslint-disable-next-line @typescript-eslint/ban-ts-comment | ||
| // @ts-ignore |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Improve type safety and code consistency
The addition of undefined checks for step.from and step.to is a good defensive programming practice. However, there are a few points to consider:
-
The use of
@ts-ignorecomments is generally discouraged as it masks potential type-related issues. Consider using proper type assertions or fixing the underlying type problems instead. -
The indentation of the added lines is inconsistent with the surrounding code, which affects readability.
-
A more type-safe approach to handling the
stepobject could be beneficial.
Consider refactoring the code as follows:
- Replace
@ts-ignorewith proper type handling:
interface Step {
from?: number;
to?: number;
}
// ...
transaction.steps.some((step: Step) =>
step.from !== undefined &&
step.to !== undefined &&
oldNodes.some(
(node) =>
node.pos >= step.from &&
node.pos + node.node.nodeSize <= step.to
)
)- Adjust the indentation to match the surrounding code:
transaction.steps.some(
(step: Step) =>
step.from !== undefined &&
step.to !== undefined &&
oldNodes.some(
(node) =>
node.pos >= step.from &&
node.pos + node.node.nodeSize <= step.to
)
)- Consider using a type guard function for a more robust type-safe approach:
function isValidStep(step: any): step is { from: number; to: number } {
return typeof step.from === 'number' && typeof step.to === 'number';
}
// ...
transaction.steps.some(
(step) =>
isValidStep(step) &&
oldNodes.some(
(node) =>
node.pos >= step.from &&
node.pos + node.node.nodeSize <= step.to
)
)These changes will improve type safety, code consistency, and readability.
| // TODO: convert them to objects instead of enums | ||
| enum badgeSizeStyling { | ||
| sm = `px-2.5 py-1 font-medium text-xs rounded flex items-center gap-1.5 whitespace-nowrap transition-all justify-center inline`, | ||
| md = `px-4 py-1.5 font-medium text-sm rounded flex items-center gap-1.5 whitespace-nowrap transition-all justify-center inline`, | ||
| lg = `px-4 py-2 font-medium text-sm rounded flex items-center gap-1.5 whitespace-nowrap transition-all justify-center inline`, | ||
| xl = `px-5 py-3 font-medium text-sm rounded flex items-center gap-1.5 whitespace-nowrap transition-all justify-center inline`, | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider converting enum to an object and refactor styling
The TODO comment suggests converting this enum to an object, which is a good idea. Objects are more flexible and easier to maintain than enums in TypeScript, especially for storing complex string values.
Additionally, consider breaking down the long styling strings into smaller, reusable classes. This would improve readability and maintainability.
Here's a suggested refactor:
const badgeSizeStyling = {
sm: {
padding: 'px-2.5 py-1',
font: 'font-medium text-xs',
layout: 'rounded flex items-center gap-1.5 whitespace-nowrap transition-all justify-center inline'
},
md: {
padding: 'px-4 py-1.5',
font: 'font-medium text-sm',
layout: 'rounded flex items-center gap-1.5 whitespace-nowrap transition-all justify-center inline'
},
// ... similar for lg and xl
} as const;
// Usage
const getBadgeStyle = (size: keyof typeof badgeSizeStyling) =>
Object.values(badgeSizeStyling[size]).join(' ');This approach allows for easier modifications and better type inference.
| // TODO: convert them to objects instead of enums | ||
| enum badgeIconStyling { | ||
| sm = "h-3 w-3 flex justify-center items-center overflow-hidden flex-shrink-0", | ||
| md = "h-3.5 w-3.5 flex justify-center items-center overflow-hidden flex-shrink-0", | ||
| lg = "h-4 w-4 flex justify-center items-center overflow-hidden flex-shrink-0", | ||
| // eslint-disable-next-line @typescript-eslint/no-duplicate-enum-values | ||
| xl = "h-4 w-4 flex justify-center items-center overflow-hidden flex-shrink-0", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Convert enum to an object and address the duplicate value issue
As with the previous enum, converting this to an object would be beneficial. This would also solve the issue with the duplicate value for 'xl' size, eliminating the need for the eslint-disable comment.
Here's a suggested refactor:
const badgeIconStyling = {
sm: "h-3 w-3 flex justify-center items-center overflow-hidden flex-shrink-0",
md: "h-3.5 w-3.5 flex justify-center items-center overflow-hidden flex-shrink-0",
lg: "h-4 w-4 flex justify-center items-center overflow-hidden flex-shrink-0",
xl: "h-4 w-4 flex justify-center items-center overflow-hidden flex-shrink-0"
} as const;
// Usage
const getIconStyle = (size: keyof typeof badgeIconStyling) => badgeIconStyling[size];This approach resolves the duplicate value issue without needing an eslint-disable comment and provides better type safety and flexibility.
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
package.jsonfiles.Refactor
interfacetotypefor certain props, improving code structure.Bug Fixes
Chores