Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[WEB-2228] fix: dashboard peek overview issue stats #5442 #5560

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 9, 2024

Conversation

anmolsinghbhatia
Copy link
Collaborator

@anmolsinghbhatia anmolsinghbhatia commented Sep 9, 2024

Reference:

[WEB-2228]

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced a new type_id property to enhance the structure of widget issues.
  • Improvements

    • Updated AssignedUpcomingIssueListItem component to use more specific identifiers for issues, improving data granularity.
    • Modified IssuePeekOverview component to prevent replacement of the current issue during data fetching, enhancing user experience during updates.
    • Streamlined issue fetching and adding logic to improve consistency in state management.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 9, 2024

Walkthrough

This pull request introduces changes to the type definitions and components related to issue management in the dashboard. A new property, type_id, is added to the TWidgetIssue type, enhancing its structure. Additionally, the AssignedUpcomingIssueListItem component updates its props to include new identifiers for issues, and the IssuePeekOverview component modifies its behavior to prevent replacing issues during data fetches. Furthermore, the fetchIssue and addIssue methods in the issue store are streamlined by removing the shouldReplace parameter, simplifying issue management.

Changes

Files Change Summary
packages/types/src/dashboard.d.ts Added `type_id: string
web/core/components/dashboard/widgets/issue-panels/issue-list-item.tsx Updated AssignedUpcomingIssueListItem component props from issueId and projectId to issueSequenceId, issueTypeId, and projectIdentifier.
web/core/components/page-views/workspace-dashboard.tsx Modified IssuePeekOverview to set shouldReplaceIssueOnFetch to false, preventing issue replacement during data fetching.
web/core/components/issues/peek-overview/root.tsx Removed shouldReplaceIssueOnFetch from IIssuePeekOverview interface and updated destructuring in IssuePeekOverview component.
web/core/store/issue/issue-details/issue.store.ts Removed shouldReplace from fetchIssue method signature, simplifying its invocation.
web/core/store/issue/issue.store.ts Modified addIssue method to remove shouldReplace parameter, ensuring existing issues are merged with new data.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

🐛bug, 🌟improvement

Poem

🐇 In the dashboard where issues play,
A new type_id joins the fray.
With identifiers bright,
They dance in the light,
Fetching data, come what may!
Hooray for changes, hip-hip-hooray! 🎉

Tip

New features

Walkthrough comment now includes:

  • Possibly related PRs: A list of potentially related PRs to help you recall past context.
  • Suggested labels: CodeRabbit can now suggest labels by learning from your past PRs. You can also provide custom labeling instructions in the UI or configuration file.

Notes:

  • Please share any feedback in the discussion post on our Discord.
  • Possibly related PRs, automatic label suggestions based on past PRs, learnings, and possibly related issues require data opt-in (enabled by default).

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between fe280b2 and 4519e63.

Files selected for processing (3)
  • packages/types/src/dashboard.d.ts (1 hunks)
  • web/core/components/dashboard/widgets/issue-panels/issue-list-item.tsx (1 hunks)
  • web/core/components/page-views/workspace-dashboard.tsx (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (3)
web/core/components/page-views/workspace-dashboard.tsx (1)

68-68: Approved change to IssuePeekOverview behavior.

The modification to set shouldReplaceIssueOnFetch to false is approved as it aligns with the objective to maintain the current issue state during data fetches.

Ensure to test this change thoroughly to confirm that it does not introduce any unintended side effects in the dashboard's functionality.

packages/types/src/dashboard.d.ts (1)

112-112: Approved addition of type_id to TWidgetIssue.

The new property type_id enhances the flexibility and usability of the TWidgetIssue type by allowing issues to have an optional type identifier. This change is beneficial for managing diverse issue types within the dashboard.

Verify that all components and functions that consume TWidgetIssue are updated to handle the type_id property correctly.

web/core/components/dashboard/widgets/issue-panels/issue-list-item.tsx (1)

70-76: Approved changes to IssueIdentifier props.

The modifications to include issueSequenceId, issueTypeId, and projectIdentifier in the props of the IssueIdentifier component are approved. These changes likely enhance the granularity and accuracy of issue identification within the dashboard.

Ensure that the backend supports these new identifiers and that they are correctly passed to the IssueIdentifier component. Verify that there are no data consistency issues introduced by these changes.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4519e63 and 3149e5c.

Files selected for processing (3)
  • web/core/components/issues/peek-overview/root.tsx (2 hunks)
  • web/core/store/issue/issue-details/issue.store.ts (3 hunks)
  • web/core/store/issue/issue.store.ts (3 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (3)
web/core/store/issue/issue.store.ts (1)

18-18: Simplified addIssue method enhances consistency.

The removal of the shouldReplace parameter simplifies the method and ensures a consistent approach to updating issues in the issuesMap. The use of lodash's update function to merge existing issues is a robust choice for handling updates.

However, it's crucial to verify that this change handles all scenarios correctly, especially in cases where an issue might need to be replaced entirely rather than merged.

Run the following script to verify the behavior of the addIssue method in various scenarios:

Also applies to: 51-56

Verification successful

Verification successful: addIssue method usage is consistent.

The addIssue method is used consistently across the codebase without the shouldReplace parameter, confirming that the recent changes have been correctly propagated. The method now consistently merges issues as intended.

  • No instances of the shouldReplace parameter were found in the usages.
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the behavior of the `addIssue` method in various scenarios.

# Test: Search for the method usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new method without `shouldReplace`.
rg --type typescript -A 5 $'addIssue'

Length of output: 71


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the behavior of the `addIssue` method in various scenarios.

# Test: Search for the method usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new method without `shouldReplace`.
rg --type ts -A 5 $'addIssue'

Length of output: 80109

web/core/store/issue/issue-details/issue.store.ts (1)

16-16: Streamlined fetchIssue method improves method invocation.

The removal of the shouldReplace parameter simplifies the method and ensures a consistent approach to fetching issues. This change could potentially improve performance by reducing the complexity of the method.

However, it's crucial to verify that this change handles all scenarios correctly, especially in cases where a fresh fetch is expected to replace existing data.

Run the following script to verify the behavior of the fetchIssue method in various scenarios:

Also applies to: 64-64

web/core/components/issues/peek-overview/root.tsx (1)

26-26: Simplified props in IssuePeekOverview enhance maintainability.

The removal of the shouldReplaceIssueOnFetch property simplifies the component's props and ensures a consistent approach to handling issue fetching. This change could potentially improve maintainability by reducing the complexity of the component.

However, it's crucial to verify that this change handles all scenarios correctly, especially in cases where a fresh fetch is expected to replace existing data.

Run the following script to verify the behavior of the IssuePeekOverview component in various scenarios:

Also applies to: 63-63

@pushya22 pushya22 merged commit 99a7867 into preview Sep 9, 2024
13 of 15 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants