Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Revert "[Clang] [Test] Use lit Syntax for Environment Variables in Clang subproject" #106267

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 28, 2024

Conversation

Harini0924
Copy link
Contributor

Reverts #102647

I am reverting this change because the readfile doesn't actually perform any useful operation, and yet, for some reason, the test still passed. This indicates that the modification was unnecessary and could lead to confusion or unexpected behavior in the future.

@llvmbot llvmbot added clang Clang issues not falling into any other category clang:driver 'clang' and 'clang++' user-facing binaries. Not 'clang-cl' labels Aug 27, 2024
@llvmbot
Copy link
Collaborator

llvmbot commented Aug 27, 2024

@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-driver

@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang

Author: None (Harini0924)

Changes

Reverts llvm/llvm-project#102647

I am reverting this change because the readfile doesn't actually perform any useful operation, and yet, for some reason, the test still passed. This indicates that the modification was unnecessary and could lead to confusion or unexpected behavior in the future.


Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/106267.diff

3 Files Affected:

  • (modified) clang/test/ClangScanDeps/pr61006.cppm (+5-5)
  • (modified) clang/test/Driver/coverage.c (+2-2)
  • (modified) clang/test/Driver/program-path-priority.c (+2-2)
diff --git a/clang/test/ClangScanDeps/pr61006.cppm b/clang/test/ClangScanDeps/pr61006.cppm
index 9ce6edaf2010e1..f75edd38c81ba9 100644
--- a/clang/test/ClangScanDeps/pr61006.cppm
+++ b/clang/test/ClangScanDeps/pr61006.cppm
@@ -6,13 +6,13 @@
 // RUN: mkdir -p %t
 // RUN: split-file %s %t
 //
-// RUN: %clang -print-resource-dir > %t/resource-dir.txt && \
+// RUN: EXPECTED_RESOURCE_DIR=`%clang -print-resource-dir` && \
 // RUN: ln -s %clang++ %t/clang++ && \
-// RUN: sed "s|EXPECTED_RESOURCE_DIR|%{readfile:%t/resource-dir.txt}|g; s|DIR|%/t|g" %t/P1689.json.in > %t/P1689.json && \
-// RUN: env EXPECTED_RESOURCE_DIR=%{readfile:%t/resource-dir.txt} clang-scan-deps -compilation-database %t/P1689.json -format=p1689 | FileCheck %t/a.cpp -DPREFIX=%/t && \
-// RUN: env EXPECTED_RESOURCE_DIR=%{readfile:%t/resource-dir.txt} clang-scan-deps -format=p1689 \
+// RUN: sed "s|EXPECTED_RESOURCE_DIR|$EXPECTED_RESOURCE_DIR|g; s|DIR|%/t|g" %t/P1689.json.in > %t/P1689.json && \
+// RUN: clang-scan-deps -compilation-database %t/P1689.json -format=p1689 | FileCheck %t/a.cpp -DPREFIX=%/t && \
+// RUN: clang-scan-deps -format=p1689 \
 // RUN:   -- %t/clang++ -std=c++20 -c -fprebuilt-module-path=%t %t/a.cpp -o %t/a.o \
-// RUN:      -resource-dir %{env:EXPECTED_RESOURCE_DIR} | FileCheck %t/a.cpp -DPREFIX=%/t
+// RUN:      -resource-dir $EXPECTED_RESOURCE_DIR | FileCheck %t/a.cpp -DPREFIX=%/t
 
 //--- P1689.json.in
 [
diff --git a/clang/test/Driver/coverage.c b/clang/test/Driver/coverage.c
index ab791ada2d351a..e5ed064aab457c 100644
--- a/clang/test/Driver/coverage.c
+++ b/clang/test/Driver/coverage.c
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@
 // GCNO-LOCATION-REL: "-coverage-notes-file={{.*}}{{/|\\\\}}foo/bar.gcno"
 
 /// GCC allows PWD to change the paths.
-// RUN: %if system-linux %{ env PWD=/proc/self/cwd %clang -### -c --coverage %s -o foo/bar.o 2>&1 | FileCheck --check-prefix=PWD %s %}
+// RUN: %if system-linux %{ PWD=/proc/self/cwd %clang -### -c --coverage %s -o foo/bar.o 2>&1 | FileCheck --check-prefix=PWD %s %}
 // PWD: "-coverage-notes-file=/proc/self/cwd/foo/bar.gcno" "-coverage-data-file=/proc/self/cwd/foo/bar.gcda"
 
 /// Don't warn -Wunused-command-line-argument.
@@ -50,6 +50,6 @@
 // LINK2: -cc1{{.*}} "-coverage-notes-file={{.*}}{{/|\\\\}}f/gb.gcno" "-coverage-data-file={{.*}}{{/|\\\\}}f/gb.gcda"
 
 /// GCC allows PWD to change the paths.
-// RUN: %if system-linux %{ env PWD=/proc/self/cwd %clang -### --coverage d/a.c d/b.c -o e/x -fprofile-dir=f 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=LINK3 %}
+// RUN: %if system-linux %{ PWD=/proc/self/cwd %clang -### --coverage d/a.c d/b.c -o e/x -fprofile-dir=f 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=LINK3 %}
 // LINK3: -cc1{{.*}} "-coverage-notes-file=/proc/self/cwd/e/x-a.gcno" "-coverage-data-file=f/proc/self/cwd/e/x-a.gcda"
 // LINK3: -cc1{{.*}} "-coverage-notes-file=/proc/self/cwd/e/x-b.gcno" "-coverage-data-file=f/proc/self/cwd/e/x-b.gcda"
diff --git a/clang/test/Driver/program-path-priority.c b/clang/test/Driver/program-path-priority.c
index 358a06d7c6d1b5..c940c4ced94420 100644
--- a/clang/test/Driver/program-path-priority.c
+++ b/clang/test/Driver/program-path-priority.c
@@ -87,8 +87,8 @@
 
 /// <default-triple>-gcc has lowest priority so <triple>-gcc
 /// on PATH beats default triple in program path
-// RUN: %t/clang --version | grep "Target:" | cut -d ' ' -f2 > %t/default-triple.txt
-// RUN: env DEFAULT_TRIPLE=%{readfile:%t/default-triple.txt} touch %t/%{env:DEFAULT_TRIPLE}-gcc && chmod +x %t/%{env:DEFAULT_TRIPLE}-gcc
+// RUN: DEFAULT_TRIPLE=`%t/clang --version | grep "Target:" | cut -d ' ' -f2`
+// RUN: touch %t/$DEFAULT_TRIPLE-gcc && chmod +x %t/$DEFAULT_TRIPLE-gcc
 // RUN: touch %t/%target_triple-gcc && chmod +x %t/%target_triple-gcc
 // RUN: env "PATH=%t/env/" %t/clang -### -target notreal-none-elf %s 2>&1 | \
 // RUN:   FileCheck --check-prefix=DEFAULT_TRIPLE_GCC %s

Copy link

⚠️ We detected that you are using a GitHub private e-mail address to contribute to the repo.
Please turn off Keep my email addresses private setting in your account.
See LLVM Discourse for more information.

@Harini0924 Harini0924 merged commit 815bf0f into main Aug 28, 2024
11 checks passed
@Harini0924 Harini0924 deleted the revert-102647-clang_env_vars branch August 28, 2024 01:52
5c4lar pushed a commit to 5c4lar/llvm-project that referenced this pull request Aug 29, 2024
…ang subproject" (llvm#106267)

Reverts llvm#102647

I am reverting this change because the `readfile` doesn't actually
perform any useful operation, and yet, for some reason, the test still
passed. This indicates that the modification was unnecessary and could
lead to confusion or unexpected behavior in the future.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
clang:driver 'clang' and 'clang++' user-facing binaries. Not 'clang-cl' clang Clang issues not falling into any other category
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants